Artistic and Critical Cinema under a Triple Threat

Triple Threat For Hepatitis C Patients

Family Practice News ◽

10.1016/s0300-7073(07)70019-1 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 37 (1) ◽

pp. 20

Author(s):

PATRICE WENDLING

Keyword(s):

Hepatitis C ◽

Triple Threat

Download Full-text

A New Triple Threat

Annals of Internal Medicine ◽

10.7326/m21-1042 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 174 (8) ◽

pp. 1175-1176

Author(s):

Jayshil J. Patel

Keyword(s):

Triple Threat

Download Full-text

Narrow and Brittle or Broad and Nimble? Comparing Adaptive Capacity in Simplifying and Diversifying Farming Systems

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems ◽

10.3389/fsufs.2021.564900 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 ◽

Author(s):

Margiana Petersen-Rockney ◽

Patrick Baur ◽

Aidee Guzman ◽

S. Franz Bender ◽

Adam Calo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adaptive Capacity ◽

Foodborne Pathogens ◽

Farming Systems ◽

Biodiversity Loss ◽

Centralized Control ◽

Marginal Lands ◽

Land Access ◽

Social Ecological ◽

Ecological Complexity ◽

Triple Threat

Humanity faces a triple threat of climate change, biodiversity loss, and global food insecurity. In response, increasing the general adaptive capacity of farming systems is essential. We identify two divergent strategies for building adaptive capacity. Simplifying processes seek to narrowly maximize production by shifting the basis of agricultural production toward centralized control of socially and ecologically homogenized systems. Diversifying processes cultivate social-ecological complexity in order to provide multiple ecosystem services, maintain management flexibility, and promote coordinated adaptation across levels. Through five primarily United States focused cases of distinct agricultural challenges—foodborne pathogens, drought, marginal lands, labor availability, and land access and tenure—we compare simplifying and diversifying responses to assess how these pathways differentially enhance or degrade the adaptive capacity of farming systems in the context of the triple threat. These cases show that diversifying processes can weave a form of broad and nimble adaptive capacity that is fundamentally distinct from the narrow and brittle adaptive capacity produced through simplification. We find that while there are structural limitations and tradeoffs to diversifying processes, adaptive capacity can be facilitated by empowering people and enhancing ecosystem functionality to proactively distribute resources and knowledge where needed and to nimbly respond to changing circumstances. Our cases suggest that, in order to garner the most adaptive benefits from diversification, farming systems should balance the pursuit of multiple goals, which in turn requires an inclusive process for active dialogue and negotiation among diverse perspectives. Instead of locking farming systems into pernicious cycles that reproduce social and ecological externalities, diversification processes can enable nimble responses to a broad spectrum of possible stressors and shocks, while also promoting social equity and ecological sustainability.

Download Full-text