scholarly journals LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY (LLLT) FOR PATIENTS WITH SACROILIAC JOINT PAIN

LASER THERAPY ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikuko Ohkuni ◽  
Nobuyuki Ushigome ◽  
Takashi Harada ◽  
Toshio Ohshiro ◽  
Kazuhiro Mizutani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint Pain ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

scholarly journals Low Level Laser Therapy for chronic knee joint pain patients

LASER THERAPY ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Nakamura ◽  
Satoru Ebihara ◽  
Ikuko Ohkuni ◽  
Hideaki Izukura ◽  
Takashi Harada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Pain Patients

Trial of Thermal Imaging in the Evaluation of Low Level Laser Therapy Effectiveness in Patients with Knee Joint Pain Syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Puzder ◽  
Kamila Gworys ◽  
Beata Rechcińska-Roślak ◽  
Jowita Gasztych ◽  
Marek Sopiński ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Thermal Imaging ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser ◽  
Therapy Effectiveness

scholarly journals LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY (LLLT) FOR CHRONIC JOINT PAIN OF THE ELBOW, WRIST AND FINGERS

LASER THERAPY ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikuko Okuni ◽  
Nobuyuki Ushigome ◽  
Takashi Harada ◽  
Toshio Ohshiro ◽  
Yoshiro Musya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

Effects of low-level laser therapy on joint pain, synovitis, anabolic, and catabolic factors in a progressive osteoarthritis rabbit model

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1875-1885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pu Wang ◽  
Chuan Liu ◽  
Xiaotian Yang ◽  
Yujing Zhou ◽  
Xiaofei Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Rabbit Model ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

scholarly journals Low Level Laser Therapy in patients with chronic foot and ankle joint pain

LASER THERAPY ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Izukura ◽  
Midori Miyagi ◽  
Takashi Harada ◽  
Toshio Ohshiro ◽  
Satoru Ebihara
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

scholarly journals A Meta-analysis of Clinical Effects of Low-level Laser Therapy on Temporomandibular Joint Pain

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1297-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Dien Chang ◽  
Chia-Lun Lee ◽  
Hung-Yu Lin ◽  
Yung-Chun Hsu ◽  
Chung-Jieh Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Pain ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

Assessment of healing of dental implant surgical site following Low-Level Laser Therapy using Bio-Clinical parameters: An Exploratory Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
VARSHA PALLED ◽  
DR. JITENDRA RAO ◽  
DR. RAGHUWAR DAYAL SINGH ◽  
DR. SHUCHI TRIPATHI ◽  
DR. KALPANA SINGH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Low Level Laser Therapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Implant Stability Quotient ◽  
Low Level Laser ◽  
Level Laser

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) improves the healing of the implant surgical site with clinical and biochemical parameters.Thirty patients with an edentulous space spanning a single tooth were selected. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups - the control group and the test group. The test group received laser energy at a power of 2J/cm 2 with a total of 4-6J energy over each implant. Clinical parameters (Implant Stability Quotient, probing index, modified sulcus bleeding index)and osteoprotegerin (OPG) were assessed at baseline and follow-up intervals (2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months).The test group showed significantly higher implant stability quotient compared to thecontrol group at 2 weeks(57.93±3.95 and 35.67±3.08; p<0.01) and 3months(58.86±3.75 and 67.06±3.78; p<0.01). A significant rise in OPG levels of the test group(686.30±125.36pg/ml at baseline and 784.25±108.30pg/ml at 3months;p<0.01) was seen contrary to significant decline in the control group (839.50±249.08pg/ml at baseline,415.30±78.39pg/ml at 3months;p<0.01). Within the limitations of the study, the study suggests that the healing of peri-implant hard and soft tissues may be enhanced with the use of LLLT as an explicit modality during the post-operative period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document