Evaluation and Comparison of Three Classes of Central Composite Designs
Keyword(s):
Three classes of Central Composite Design: Central Composite Circumscribed Design (CCCD), Central Composite Inscribed Design (CCID) and Central Composite Face-Centered Design (CCFD) in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) were evaluated and compared using the A-, D-, and G-efficiencies for factors, k, ranging from 3 to 10, with 0-5 centre points, in other to determine the performances of the designs under consideration. The results show that the CCDs (CCCD, CCFD and CCID) are at their best when the G-efficiency is employed for all the factors considered while the CCID especially behaves poorly when using the A- and D-efficiencies.
2016 ◽
Vol 5
(4)
◽
pp. 22
1973 ◽
Vol 15
(4)
◽
pp. 295-310
◽
2015 ◽
Vol 144
◽
pp. 1-10
◽
2018 ◽
Vol 28
(6)
◽
pp. 2689-2700
◽
2013 ◽
Vol 785-786
◽
pp. 279-286