ScienceGate
transfemoral approach

Search In:  

All Text Fields
Authors
DOI
Years
Sources
Keywords
Publishers
Document Types

290 results for transfemoral approach in 3 miliseconds

Author(s):
Israel M. Barbash
Amit Segev
Anat Berkovitch
Paul Fefer
Elad Maor
Dan Elian
Ehud Regev
Victor Guetta

Background: A small proportion of patients in need of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are not suitable for the transfemoral approach due to peripheral artery disease. Alternative TAVR approaches are associated with short- and long-term hazards. A novel technique of caval-aortic (transcaval) access for TAVR has been utilized as an alternative access technique.Aim: To compare safety and efficacy of transcaval access as compared to other alternative access (axillary or apical) for TAVR.Methods: A single-center, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing alternative access for TAVR. Events were adjudicated according to VARC-2 criteria.Results: A total of 185 patients were included in the present analysis. Mean age was 81 years with a small majority for male gender (54%). Of the entire cohort, 20 patients (12%) underwent transcaval TAVR, and 165 patients (82%) underwent TAVR using alternative access. Overall, baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. General anesthesia was not utilized in transcaval patients; however, it was routinely used in nearly all alternative access patients. TAVR device success was comparable between the two groups (95%). Acute kidney injury occurred significantly less frequently among transcaval patients as compared to alternative access patients (5 vs. 12%, p = 0.05). Hospital stay was shorter for transcaval patients (6.3 days vs. 14.4; p < 0.001). No difference in early or 30-day mortality (10 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.74) was noted between groups.Conclusions: In patients who cannot undergo TAVR via the trans-femoral approach due to peripheral vascular disease, transcaval access is a safe approach as compared to other alternative access techniques, with lower risk of kidney injury and shorter hospital stay.

2021 ◽
Author(s):
Yudai Tamura
Yuichi Tamura
Yutaka Konami
Hiroto Suzuyama
Eiji Horio
Masahiro Yamada
Toshiharu Sassa
Eiji Taguchi
Yoko Horibata
Ichiro Ideta
Akio Kawamura
Tomohiro Sakamoto
2021 ◽
Vol 74(3)
pp. e128
Author(s):
Rohini Patel
Asma Mathlouthi
Omar Al-Nouri
John S. Lane
Mahmoud B. Malas
Andrew Barleben

Abstract Background  Left ventricular (LV) pseudoaneurysm (PSA), also referred to as contained LV wall rupture, is a clinically uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition that can occur after myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery. If the anatomic characteristics of LV PSA are not eligible for the transfemoral approach, percutaneous closure of LV PSA can be technically difficult and appropriate approach selection may contribute to procedural success. Case summary  An enlarging LV PSA was discovered in a 65-year-old man with Marfan syndrome and three prior cardiothoracic surgeries. Arterial access was not possible due to invagination of the previously placed surgical graft in the descending thoracic aorta. This was managed with a novel approach of simultaneous transseptal LV access and direct puncture of PSA through the chest wall followed by a vascular plug placement. Discussion  This case demonstrates that percutaneous LV PSA closure using a hybrid approach of transseptal and direct apical puncture is a feasible and effective alternative for high-risk surgical candidates, although the anatomic characteristics are unsuitable for the transfemoral approach.

2021 ◽
Vol 10(17)
pp. 3857
Author(s):
Andrea Agostinelli
Alan Gallingani
Francesco Maestri
Silvia Grossi
Florida Gripshi
Luca De Donno
Francesco Nicolini

Since the advent of TAVR (transcatheter aortic valve replacement), the transapical surgical approach has been affirmed as a safe and effective alternative access for patients with unsuitable peripheral arteries. With the improvement of devices for transfemoral approach and the development of other alternative accesses, the number of transapical procedures has decreased significantly worldwide. The left ventricular apex, however, has proved to be a safe and valid alternative access for various other structural heart procedures such as mitral valve repair, mitral valve-in-valve or valve-in-ring replacement, transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), transcatheter mitral paravalvular leak repair, and thoracic aorta endovascular repair (TEVAR). We review the literature and our experience of various hybrid transcatheter structural heart procedures using the transapical surgical approach and discuss pros and cons.

Author(s):
Giulia Lorenzoni
Danila Azzolina
Chiara Fraccaro
Caterina Zoccarato
Clara Minto
Sabino Iliceto
Dario Gregori
Giuseppe Tarantini

The present study aimed to analyze sleep quality and quality of Life (QoL) in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). It was conducted at the Interventional Cardiology Unit of the Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health of the University of Padova on 27 adult patients who underwent TAVI via the transfemoral approach. Patients completed two validated instruments, i.e., the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L), on the day of discharge and one month after the hospital discharge. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled with a severe aortic stenosis diagnosis, treated with transfemoral TAVI procedure. The study population included seventeen poor sleepers and ten good sleepers with a median age of 81.92 years overall. The global PSQI evaluation revealed a small significant improvement at follow-up (p-value 0.007). Small positive changes were detected in the Self-care and Usual activity domains of the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-VAS. No correlation was detected between EQ-5D-5L and sleep quality. The present study confirms the importance of sleep quality monitoring in patients who undergo TAVI procedure for aortic stenosis treatment.

Author(s):
Deborah Toby
Sergei Wassiljev
Lina Kirchner
Giovanni Torsello
Denise M.D. Özdemir-van Brunschot
Author(s):
Rimal H Dossani
Muhammad Waqas
Justin M Cappuzzo
Ashish Sonig
Faisal Almayman
Adnan H Siddiqui
Elad I Levy
Jason M Davies
Adam Arthur
Mark Bain
Bernard Bendock
Mandy Jo Binning
Alan S Boulos
Webster Crowley
Richard Fessler
Andrew Grande
Lee Guterman
Ricardo Hanel
Daniel Hoit
L Nelson Hopkins
Jay Howington
Robert James
Brian Jankowitz
Peter Kan
Alex A Khalessi
Louis Kim
David Langer
Giuseppe Lanzino
Michael Levitt
Elad I Levy
Demetrius Lopes
William Mack
Robert Mericle
J Mocco
Chris Ogilvy
Aditya Pandey
Robert Replogle
Howard Riina
Andrew Ringer
Rafael Rodriguez
Eric Saugaveau
Clemens Schirmer
Adnan H Siddiqui
Alex Spiotta
Ali Sultan
Rabih Tawk
Ajith Thomas
Raymond Turner
Erol Veznedaroglu
Babu Welch
Jonathan White

Abstract Transfemoral access has long been the main access site for cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures. Radial access is accepted as an alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach. Ulnar access may be undertaken if the radial artery is occluded or small caliber, or when radial artery preservation is needed. The safety and feasibility of ulnar access for neuroangiographic procedures has been demonstrated.1-3 In this operative video, we demonstrate ulnar artery access in a patient in whom radial artery preservation was desired. We further elaborate on the technical nuances of this access. This nontraditional access site offers the same advantages as radial access, avoiding the need to switch to femoral artery access. A preoperative Allen's test is not necessary. Ultrasound imaging is used to aid in the identification and successful puncture of the ulnar artery. A medial to lateral approach for ulnar artery puncture is advised to avoid injury to the ulnar nerve. Careful application of wrist closure bands avoids hematoma accumulation.  The patient gave informed consent for the procedure and video recording. Institutional review board approval was deemed unnecessary.  Video. © University at Buffalo, May 2021. Used with permission.

Items per page:
11 – 20 of 290