scholarly journals REALITAS PEMBERLAKUAN UAN/UN

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darmaningtyas Darmaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Educational System ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
School Quality ◽  
Social Reality ◽  
The Other ◽  
National Education ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Educational Decentralization ◽  
The Government ◽  
Education Standard

AbstractThough it is controversial, implementing UN as a graduation standard for any students has continued so far. Juridical bases are UU No. 20/2003 regarding National Educational System and Government Regulation (PP) No. 19/2005 regarding National Education Standard. The fact is that UN encourages students to leaarn more actively, teachers to teach better, principals to improve school quality, and parents to focus more on making their children study more enthusiastically. However, still there are parties nit agreeing with the government act. The rejection of UN is based on different interpretations on the existence of Law No. 19/2005, educational decentralization principle, different paradigm in understanding of national education objective, social reality in community, and the educational function. On the other hand, the government should fulfill minimal service standard before they implement educational nationalization.

MEMBANGUN PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER SEJAK USIA DINI

Edupedia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-64
Author(s):  
Agus Supriyadi
Keyword(s):  
Human Resources ◽  
Character Education ◽  
Moral Values ◽  
The Other ◽  
Educational Institutions ◽  
Early Age ◽  
National Education ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One

Character education is a vital instrument in determining the progress of a nation. Therefore the government needs to build educational institutions in order to produce good human resources that are ready to oversee and deliver the nation at a progressive level. It’s just that in reality, national education is not in line with the ideals of national education because the output is not in tune with moral values on the one hand and the potential for individuals to compete in world intellectual order on the other hand. Therefore, as a solution to these problems is the need for the applicationof character education from an early age.

scholarly journals AIR QUALITY MONITORING OF KALABAHI-ALOR’S SEAPORT-EAST OF NUSA TENGGARA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-133
Author(s):  
Rikson Siburian ◽  
Minsyahril Bukit ◽  
Herlince Sihotang ◽  
Saur Lumban Raja ◽  
Minto Supeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Air Quality ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Quality Monitoring ◽  
Air Quality Monitoring ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The People ◽  
The Government

Evaluation of environment of seaport is needed as well as our responsibility to nature sustainability. The Alor’s seaport belongs to Pelindo III. In order to know the air quality of Alor’s seaport, we did this study. Our aims are to know level quality of air at Alor’s seaport and compare to the government regulation. This study refers to Pararosaniline (SOx), Saltzman (NOx), Particle Calculation (dust) and decibel (noisy) methods. We used four locations, those are A-1 (Entrance gate of PELINDO (8013’09.12”S, 124031’07.21”E)); A-2 (In front of passengers terminal (8013’08.75”S, 124031’01.60”E)); A-3 (Exit  gate Kalabahi’s seaport (8013’08.2”S, 124031’00.87”E)) and A-4 (In front of port of the people (8011’09.12”S, 124031’07.21”E)). Results show that the averages level of SOx, NOx and dust of A-1, A-2 and A-3 are 103.01, 104.65 and 107.47 (µg/Nm3), 37.87, 30.62, and 39.73 (µg/Nm3), 56.64, 47.47 and 50.72 (µg/Nm), respectively. On the other hand, the level of noisy of A-1, A-2, A-3 and A-4 are 68.76, 65.69, 65.20 and 73.60 (dBA), respectively. Base on all of data, we conclude that the air quality of Alor’s seaport is still appropriate according to government regulation (PP. No. 4, 1999).

scholarly journals Fiqh Pandemi: Tinjauan Kritis terhadap PP No. 21 Tahun 2020 tentang PSBB dengan Pendekatan Sadd al-Dhari’ah

AKADEMIKA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ja'far Shodiq ◽  
Muh. Mahrus Ali Ridho ◽  
Mufidul Abror
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Social Interaction ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Regional Level ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Government

Presiden Indonesia memulai mengadakan pembatasan interaksi sosial mulai dari tingkat dasar sampai regional untuk mencegah penyebaran virus Corona di bebrapa wilayah Indonesia. Virus Corona adalah virus yang membahayakan dan pembatasan ini sangat penting sekali apalagi di wilayah-wilayah yang masyarakatnya tidak bisa diatur dan tidak memungkinkan untuk mencegah meluasnya virus tersebut di wilayah-wilayah itu. Karena virus Corona telah memakan korban lebih dari seribu orang. Data korban ini tertanggal 28 Maret 2020. Pembahasan Ini dianggap sebagai bagian dari pembelajaran normatif yg konseptual. Sedangkan tema dari pembahasan ini adalah; Regulasi tentang Penerapan Pembatasan interaksi sosial. Sasaran dari pembelajaran ini adalah; 1. Pengetahuan tentang kaidah-kaidah hukum di Indonesia yang mengatur tentang pembatasan interaksi sosial mulai dari tingkat lokal sampai regional. 2.Pengetahuan tentang pembatasan interaksi sosial ditunjumau dari sisi pemutusan mata rantai virus. Sedangkan hasil dari pembahasan ini adalah; 1. Regulasi yang dipakai presiden untuk pembatasan interaksi sosial pada peraturan pemerintah nomor 21 tahun 2020. Seperti pada ayat 1 pasal 4 yang didalamnya mencantumkan larangan bepergian ke sekolahan untuk belajar dan larangan bepergian ke tempat kerja untuk bekerja yang hal ini termasuk bagian dari pembatasan terhadap hak-hak kemanusiaan, 2. Pembatasan ini dinilai  menjadi wasilah untuk menjaga nyawa masyarakat Indonesia namun di sisi lain mencabut pembatasan ini hukumnya wajib.The President of Indonesia began to implement social restrictions ranging from local to regional level to prevent the spread of the Corona virus in several parts of Indonesia. The Corona virus is a dangerous one and these restrictions are very important, especially in areas where the community cannot be controlled and it is not possible to prevent the spread of the virus in these areas. Moreover the Corona virus has killed more than a thousand people. The Corona deaths data is dated March 28, 2020. This study is considered as part of conceptual normative one. While the theme of this study is the Regulation on the implementation of social interaction restrictions. The objectives of this study are; 1. the understanding of legal principles in Indonesia that regulate the social interaction restrictions from local to regional levels. 2. the understanding of social interaction restrictions viewed from the breaking of the chains of infection. While the results of this study are; 1. The regulation used by the president to implement social interaction restrictions are the government regulation number 21, 2020. As in paragraph 1, article 4, which includes the prohibition on going to school and traveling to work which is part of the restrictions on human rights, 2. These restrictions are considered to be a means of protecting the lives of the Indonesian people but on the other hand lifting the restrictions is obligatory.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN ORGANISASI KEMASYARAKATAN ASING DI INDONESIA DI TINJAU DARI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 59 TAHUN 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Elwidarifa Marwenny ◽  
Engrina Fauzi ◽  
Jelisye Putri Cenery
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Community Organization ◽  
Community Organizations ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Government

One of the form of applying the value of democratic in Indonesia is accommodate by the regulation of community organization which is concretely regulated in the provisions of article 28 E Paragraph 3 of the 1945 constitution also in the provisions of law number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights. The existence of community organizations does have a great constribution in the implementation of the state, but on the other hand the existence of people raises the pro and contra. The enecment of government regulation number 59 on community organization established by foreign citizens makes the community more worried if the exixtance of community organizations affect the sovereignty of NKRI because they have different ideology with Indonesia. Based on this, it should be discussed about the organizations in Indonesia. The position of foreign social organizatios in Indonesia is reviwed from the government regulation number 59 of 2016 on community organizations established by foreign citizens and the influence of basic organizations for the sovereignty of NKRI. To answer that question, qualitative method is used  as a means to answer the problem by conducting of normative juridical approach which is done by reviewing the law and the literature. Based on this study, it is concluded that the existence of foreign social organizatios in Indonesia in line with  democracy and human right but also politically can treaten NKRI.

scholarly journals Akseptabilitas Konsep Integrasi Pendidikan Islam dalam Sistem Pendidikan Nasional

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-59
Author(s):  
Akhiyat Akhiyat
Keyword(s):  
Education System ◽  
The Other ◽  
Islamic Education ◽  
National Education ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
National Education System ◽  
Prophetic Tradition ◽  
The Government ◽  
Valid Information

The dichotomy of the education system causes a gap between the sourcesof knowledge, between the religious sciences and general sciences. In thebook Integrasi Ilmu: Sebuah Rekonstruksi Holistik, the supporters of thereligious sciences only consider divine source and prophetic tradition asvalid sources and reject the others. On the other hand, secular scientistsonly considered valid information obtained through sensory observation.Therefore, the integration of Islamic education in the national educationsystem is part of the problems. According to the writer, the approachshould be integrated. All legislation and policies made by the government(which appears to lead to the integration) are effort to prepare and realizethe law of “one national education system ", as foreseen by Article 31 of the1945 Constitution. With the enactment of Law No. 2 of 1989 on NationalEducation System, supported by Act No. 20 of 2003 (also on NationalEducation System), the effort of integration of Islamic education into thenational education system has got legal standing.

scholarly journals The Focus on the Sustainability of Lobster in Indonesia as a Result of Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number 12 of 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lely Puspitasari Adinoto
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Marine Animal ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The People ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Fisheries Regulation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One

The existence of Regulation of the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Number 12 of 2020 provides pros and cons for the government and the people of Indonesia, especially for fisheries and marine animal cultivation businesses. On the one hand, this regulation benefits several parties and on the other hand is detrimental to shrimp and lobster cultivation business actors due to complicated regulations. In fact, this policy is also related to Government Regulation Number 75 of 2015 concerning Types and Rates of PNBP so that this government regulation cannot be enforced.

scholarly journals THE LARGE SCALE SOCIAL RESTRICTIONS POLICY FOR HANDLING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fradhana Putra Disantara
Keyword(s):  
Critical Review ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Government ◽  
Secondary Materials

This legal research uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. This research was carried out by inventorying primary and secondary materials, so as to obtain an appropriate analysis and critical review of published legal issues. The purpose of the study was to analyze the dynamics of Large Scale Social Restrictions Policies, especially regarding the Regulation of Minister of Health Number 9 of 2020and analyze various problematic PSBB policies during the pandemic. This study states that the PSBB is different from regional quarantine. On the other hand, the PSBB regulation in the Regulation of Minister of Health Number 9 of 2020  also raises doubts.Then,the Chief of Police's Declaration Mak/2/III/2020 provided strong legitimacy to strengthen the PSBB policy in terms of public compliance.The PSBB policy by the Central and Regional Governments has left various problems. Starting from material errors, contradiction of the article in the Governor's Regulation, and the Governor's Regulation which is not based on the Law above. The solution that can be done is to revise the Government Regulation No. 21 of 2020 and conduct executive review of the Governor's Regulation. 

scholarly journals Mengembangkan Format Penilaian Komprehensif dalam Pengembangan KTSP

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-429
Author(s):  
Muhamad Nurhalim
Keyword(s):  
Curriculum Development ◽  
Policy Evaluation ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Logical Consequence ◽  
The Other ◽  
Rating System ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Government ◽  
Management Curriculum

Abstract: Logical consequence enactment Permendiknas No. 22, 23, and 24 in 2006 and Government Regulation (PP), No. 19 in 2005 was the management curriculum is left entirely to each the education unit which includes covering the development, implemntation to the evaluation. In management, it is expected every Education Unit able to integrate the development, implementation and evaluation in accordance with the principles of valuation. In the field of development and implementation, in implicit regulation orders to accommodate either three domains of cognitive, effective, psychomotor which is comprehensive and continous. But on the other hand, policy evaluation and rating system specified is not relevant to the demands that were ordered. Therefore, this paper tries to describe the format of assesment in accordance with the principles of the development, implementation and assesment principles in the curriculum or the Education Unit as outlined in Permendiknas and the Government Regulation (PP). Keywords: Format, Evaluation, Curriculum, Development, Implementation, and Education.

Timber

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Civil War ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Charles Taylor ◽  
The Other ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Forestry Sector ◽  
The Government ◽  
The One ◽  
Timber Market

During the civil war, Liberia’s forestry sector rose to prominence as Charles Taylor traded timber for arms. When the war ended, the UN’s timber sanctions remained in effect, reinforced by the Forestry Development Authority’s (FDA) domestic ban on logging. As Liberians waited for UN timber sanctions to be lifted, a burgeoning domestic timber market developed. This demand was met by artisanal loggers, more commonly referred to as pit sawyers. Out of this illicit economy emerged the Nezoun Group to provide local dispute resolution between the FDA’s tax collectors and ex-combatant pit sawyers. The Nezoun Group posed a dilemma for the government. On the one hand, the regulatory efforts of the Nezoun Group helped the FDA to tax an activity that it had banned. On the other hand, the state’s inability to contain the operations of the Nezoun Group—in open contravention of Liberian laws—highlighted the government’s capacity problems.

Party and the Augustan Constitution, 1694-1716: Politics and the Power of the Executive

1978 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-208
Author(s):  
Dennis A. Rubini
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Glorious Revolution ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The Commons ◽  
The Government ◽  
Charles Ii ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Glorious Revolution

William of Orange tried to be as absolute as possible. Inroads upon the power of the executive were fiercely resisted: indeed, William succeeded in keeping even the judiciary in a precarious state of independence. To maintain the prerogative and gain the needed supplies from parliament, he relied upon a mixed whig-tory ministry to direct court efforts. Following the Glorious Revolution, the whigs had divided into two principle groups. One faction led by Robert Harley and Paul Foley became the standard-bearers of the broadly based Country party, maintained the “old whig” traditions, did not seek office during William's reign, tried to hold the line on supply, and led the drive to limit the prerogative. The “junto,” “court,” or “new” whigs, on the other hand, were led by ministers who, while in opposition during the Exclusion crisis, held court office, aggressively sought greater offices, and wished to replace monarchy with oligarchy. They soon joined tory courtiers in opposing many of the Country party attempts to place additional restrictions upon the executive. To defend the prerogative and gain passage for bills of supply, William also developed techniques employed by Charles II. By expanding the concept and power of the Court party, he sought to bring together the executive and legislative branches of government through a large cadre of crown office-holders (placemen) who sat, voted, and directed the votes of others on behalf of the government when matters of importance arose in the Commons. So too, William claimed the right to dissolve parliament and call new elections not on a fixed date, as was to become the American practice, but at the time deemed most propitious over first a three-year and then (after 1716) a seven year period.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document