Racial/ethnic disparities in exposure to COVID-19, susceptibility to COVID-19 and access to health care - findings from a U.S. national cohort

We examined the influence of racial/ethnic differences in socioeconomic position on COVID-19 seroconversion and hospitalization within a community-based prospective cohort enrolled in March 2020 and followed through October 2021 (N=6740). The ability to social distance as a measure of exposure to COVID-19, susceptibility to COVID-19 complications, and access to healthcare varied by race/ethnicity with non-white participants having more exposure risk and more difficulty with healthcare access than white participants. Participants with more (versus less) exposure had greater odds of seroconversion (aOR:1.64, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.18-2.29). Participants with more susceptibility and more barriers to healthcare had greater odds of hospitalization (respective aOR:2.36; 1.90-2.96 and 2.31; 1.69-2.68). Race/ethnicity positively modified the association between susceptibility and hospitalization (aORnon-White:2.79, 2.06-3.78). Findings may explain the disproportionate burden of COVID-19 infections and complications among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black persons. Primary and secondary prevention efforts should address disparities in exposure, COVID-19 vaccination, and treatment.

Treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of mortality among a national cohort of admitted patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection

Objectives: To analyze treatment, clinical outcomes, and predictors of mortality in hospitalized patients with Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of inpatients with A. baumannii cultures and treatment from 2010-2019. Patients who died during admission were compared to those who survived to identify predictors of inpatient mortality, using multivariable unconditional logistic regression models. Results: We identified 4,599 inpatients with A. baumannii infection; 13.6% died during admission. Fluoroquinolones (26.8%), piperacillin/tazobactam (24%) and carbapenems (15.6%) were used for treatment. Tigecycline (3%) and polymyxins (3.7%) were not used often. Predictors of inpatient mortality included current acute respiratory failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.94), shock (aOR 3.05), and acute renal failure (aOR 2.01); blood (aOR 1.94) and respiratory (aOR 1.64) infectious source; multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (MDRAB) infection (aOR 1.66); liver disease (aOR 2.15); and inadequate initial treatment (aOR 1.30). Inpatient mortality was higher in those with MDRAB vs. non-MDRAB (aOR 1.61) and in those with CRAB vs. non-CRAB infection (aOR 1.68). Length of stay >10 days was higher among those with MDRAB vs. non-MDRAB (aOR 1.25) and in those with CRAB vs. non-CRAB infection (aOR 1.31). Conclusions: In our national cohort of inpatients with A. baumannii infection, clinical outcomes were worse among those with MDRAB and/or CRAB infection. Predictors of inpatient mortality included several current conditions associated with severity, infectious source, underlying illness, and inappropriate treatment. Our study may assist healthcare providers in the early identification of admitted patients with A. baumannii infection who are at higher risk of death.

Risk of New Primary Cancer in Patients with Posterior Uveal Melanoma: A National Cohort Study

Background: Studies on the risk of new primary cancer in patients with posterior uveal melanoma (UM) have produced conflicting results, and the role of socioeconomic status (SES) is unknown. The purpose of this population-based matched cohort study was to determine the risk of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM. Methods: 2179 patients with posterior UM 1968–2016 and 22,717 matched controls without cancer were included. Incidence and time-dependent hazard ratio (HR) of new primary cancer were described, and the effect of SES was emphasized in a sub-cohort. Results: The incidence of new primary cancer was increased in patients with posterior UM, rate ratio (RR) 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08; 1.35), but the specific cancer types did not differ compared to the controls. The rate of new primary cancer following the diagnosis of posterior UM was significantly increased 2–5 years (HR 1.49 (95% CI: 1.23; 1.80)) and 11–15 years (HR: 1.49 (95% CI: 1.12; 1.99)), and adjusting for SES did not change the rate (HR 1.35 (95% CI:1.20; 1.55)). Conclusions: Patients with posterior UM have an increased risk of new primary cancer independent of SES. No difference in incidence of specific cancer type was observed compared to the control group.

Executive dysfunction following SARS-CoV-2 infection: A cross-sectional examination in a population-representative sample

Objective: To determine whether SRS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 symptom severity are associated with executive dysfunction among members of the general population, including those not hospitalized or exposed to intubation. Design: Cross-sectional observation study with data from an ongoing national cohort study of young and middle-aged adults. The Canadian COVID-19 Experiences Project (CCEP) survey involves 1,958 adults with equal representation of vaccinated and vaccine hesitant adults between the ages of 18 and 54 years. Setting: Population-based survey of community dwelling adults, representative of the broader Canadian population. Participants: Men and women between 18 and 54 years of age from English and French speaking provinces. The sample comprised 1,958 adults with a mean age of 37 years (SD=10.4); 60.8% were female. Exposures: SARS-CoV-2 infection with COVID-19 symptoms of any severity, ranging from negligeable to life-threatening infection requiring hospitalization. Primary Outcome: Symptoms of cognitive dysfunction assessed via an abbreviated form of the Barkley Deficits in Executive Functioning Scale (BDEFS). Results: Those who reported a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection regardless of COVID-19 symptom severity (Madj=1.89, SE=0.08, CI: 1.74, 2.04; n=175) reported a significantly higher number of symptoms of executive dysfunction than their non-infected counterparts (Madj=1.63, SE=0.08, CI: 1.47,1.80; n=1,599; β=0.26, p=.001). Among those infected, there was a dose-response relationship between COVID-19 symptom severity and level of executive dysfunction, with moderate (β=0.23, CI: 0.003-0.46) and very/extremely severe (β= 0.69, CI: 0.22-1.16) COVID-19 symptoms being associated with significantly greater dysfunction, compared to asymptomatic. These effects remained reliable and of similar magnitude after removing those who had been received intubation and when controlling for vaccination status. Conclusions: Positive SARS-CoV-2 infection history and COVID-19 symptom severity are associated with executive dysfunction among young and middle-aged adults with no history of medically induced coma.