Impact of exposure time in awake prone positioning on clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure treated with high-flow nasal oxygen: a multicenter cohort study

Background In patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure (ARF), awake prone positioning (AW-PP) reduces the need for intubation in patients treated with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). However, the effects of different exposure times on clinical outcomes remain unclear. We evaluated the effect of AW-PP on the risk of endotracheal intubation and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19-related ARF treated with HFNO and analyzed the effects of different exposure times to AW-PP. Methods This multicenter prospective cohort study in six ICUs of 6 centers in Argentine consecutively included patients > 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19-related ARF requiring HFNO from June 2020 to January 2021. In the primary analysis, the main exposure was awake prone positioning for at least 6 h/day, compared to non-prone positioning (NON-PP). In the sensitivity analysis, exposure was based on the number of hours receiving AW-PP. Inverse probability weighting–propensity score (IPW-PS) was used to adjust the conditional probability of treatment assignment. The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation (ETI); and the secondary outcome was hospital mortality. Results During the study period, 580 patients were screened and 335 were included; 187 (56%) tolerated AW-PP for [median (p25–75)] 12 (9–16) h/day and 148 (44%) served as controls. The IPW–propensity analysis showed standardized differences < 0.1 in all the variables assessed. After adjusting for other confounders, the OR (95% CI) for ETI in the AW-PP group was 0.36 (0.2–0.7), with a progressive reduction in OR as the exposure to AW-PP increased. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for hospital mortality in the AW-PP group ≥ 6 h/day was 0.47 (0.19–1.31). The exposure to prone positioning ≥ 8 h/d resulted in a further reduction in OR [0.37 (0.17–0.8)]. Conclusion In the study population, AW-PP for ≥ 6 h/day reduced the risk of endotracheal intubation, and exposure ≥ 8 h/d reduced the risk of hospital mortality.

Performance of custom made videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation: A systematic review

Introduction Videolaryngoscope is regarded as the standard of care for airway management in well-resourced setups however the technology is largely inaccessible and costly in middle and low-income countries. An improvised and cost-effective form of customized videolaryngoscope was proposed and studied for patient care in underprivileged areas however there were no distinct conclusions on its performances. Method The study follows PRISMA guidelines for systematic review and the protocol in International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews. The primary aim was to assess the first attempt success of customized videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation. The secondary objective was to evaluate the number of attempts, laryngoscopic view in terms of Cormack Lehane score and Percentage of glottic opening, use of external laryngeal maneuver and stylet and, the airway injuries after the endotracheal intubation. Result Five studies were analyzed for risk of bias using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for cross-sectional studies. Most of the studies had a poor to a fair level of evidence with only one study with a good level of evidence. Certainty of evidence was “very low” for all eligible studies when graded using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for systematic review. Conclusions The certainty of the evidence regarding performance of custom-made videolaryngoscope compared to conventional laryngoscope was very low and the study was performed in small numbers with fair to the poor risk of bias. It was difficult to establish and do further analysis regarding whether the customized form of videolaryngoscope will improve the first attempt success rate for tracheal intubation, reduce the number of attempts, improve the laryngoscopic view, require fewer external aids and reduce the incidences of airway injury with the given low-grade evidence. Some properly conducted randomised clinical trials will be required to further analyze the outcome and make the strong recommendations.

Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test with Modified Mallampati Score in Predicting Difficult Intubation

Background and Aims: Identifying a patient with a difficult airway is important in planning anaesthetic management so that endotracheal intubation can be achieved safely. This study aims to compare modified Mallampati score with Upper Lip Bite Test to predict difficult intubation using intubation difficulty scale. Materials and methods: A prospective study was carried on 104 patients, both sexes aged between 18 to 60 years scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient airway was evaluated by MMT and ULBT preoperatively. Predictors of difficult endotracheal intubation were assigned to MMT class III and IV, ULBT class III. After premedication and induction laryngoscopy was performed. After successful intubation Intubation difficulty score was noted down based on the sum of seven assessing parameters. A score >5 was considered difficult intubation. Results: The incidence of difficult intubation in the study was 10.6% (i.e. 11 out of 104 patients). In this study ULBT had a higher sensitivity (90.9% v/s 18.20%), specificity (95.7% v/s 75.3%) PPV (71.4% v/s 8%) and NPV (98.9% v/s 88.6%) than that of MMT Conclusion: Upper lip bite test is better at predicting difficult intubation with higher accuracy when compared to Modified Mallampati test. Both the tests are good predictors of easy intubation. Keywords: Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Modified Mallampati test (MMT), Intubation Difficulty scale (IDS), airway assessment. Difficult intubation prediction, Difficult airway

Outcomes of Early versus Late Endotracheal Intubation in Patients with Initial Non-Shockable Rhythm Cardiopulmonary Arrest in the Emergency Department

Background. Sudden cardiac arrest is a critical condition in the emergency department (ED). Currently, there is no considerable evidence supporting the best time to complete advanced airway management (AAM) with endotracheal intubation in cardiac arrest patients presented with initial non-shockable cardiac rhythm. Objectives. To compare survival to hospital discharge and discharge with favorable neurological outcome between the ED cardiac arrest patients who have received AAM with endotracheal intubation within 2 minutes (early AAM group) and those over 2 minutes (late AAM group) after the start of chest compression in ED. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving the ED cardiac arrest patients who presented with initial non-shockable rhythm in ED. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent effect of early AAM on outcomes. The outcomes included the survival to hospital discharge and discharge with favorable neurological outcome. Results. There were 416 eligible participants: 209 in the early AAM group and 207 participants in the late AAM group. The early AAM group showed higher survival to hospital discharge compared with the late AAM group, but no statistically significant difference (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59 -2.76, p = 0.524 ). Discharge with favorable neurological outcome is also higher in the early AAM group (aOR: 1.68, 95% CI, 0.52 -5.45, p = 0.387 ). Conclusion. This study did not demonstrate a significant improvement of survival to hospital discharge and discharge with favorable neurological outcome in the ED cardiac arrest patients with initial non-shockable cardiac arrest who underwent early AAM within two minutes. More research is needed on the timing of AAM and on airway management strategies to improve survival.

Pre-Operative, Prophylactic Use of Oral Zinc Tablet in the Management of Post-Operative Sore Throat

Background: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is considered to be quite common complaint. Its symptoms tend to improve with time, but use of oral zinc lozenge has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of POST. The aim of the present study was to find the efficacy of oral zinc sulfate, given 30 min preoperatively, in reducing POST, primarily caused by endotracheal intubation, till 24 hours after surgery. Method: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-control-trial study was conducted on 80 patients, further divided into two groups of 40 patients each, between the age group of 18-60 years, of either gender, in Super Specialty Hospital, GMC Jammu, over a period of 6-months. The two groups received either dispersible zinc tablet or a placebo. The severity of POST was graded on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3 and evaluation was repeated at 30 min, 2, 4, and 24 hour, postoperatively. Results: The difference in severity of sore throat was found to be statistically significant at all evaluation time intervals, except at 24 hours, which was quite lower in Zinc group. The overall incidence of POST in Zinc group was 26.3%, which was significantly higher at 50% in placebo group. Conclusion: A dose 40 mg zinc dispersible tablet, equivalent to 40 mg elemental zinc, given 30 min before surgery, effectively reduced the incidence and severity of POST. Keywords: Post Operative Sore Throat, Oral Zinc Lozenge, Endotracheal Intubation.