scholarly journals Interactome Data and Databases: Different Types of Protein Interaction

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier De Las Rivas ◽  
Alberto de Luis
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Experimental Methods ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Bioinformatic Tool ◽  
Different Types

In recent years, the biomolecular sciences have been driven forward by overwhelming advances in new biotechnological high-throughput experimental methods and bioinformatic genome-wide computational methods. Such breakthroughs are producing huge amounts of new data that need to be carefully analysed to obtain correct and useful scientific knowledge. One of the fields where this advance has become more intense is the study of the network of ‘protein–protein interactions’, i.e. the ‘interactome’. In this short review we comment on the main data and databases produced in this field in last 5 years. We also present a rationalized scheme of biological definitions that will be useful for a better understanding and interpretation of ‘what a protein–protein interaction is’ and ‘which types of protein–protein interactions are found in a living cell’. Finally, we comment on some assignments of interactome data to defined types of protein interaction and we present a new bioinformatic tool called APIN (Agile Protein Interaction Network browser), which is in development and will be applied to browsing protein interaction databases.

scholarly journals Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Related to Protein Complexes Based on Protein Interaction Networks

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Peng Liu ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
Daming Shi ◽  
Xianglong Tang
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Small Parts

A method for predicting protein-protein interactions based on detected protein complexes is proposed to repair deficient interactions derived from high-throughput biological experiments. Protein complexes are pruned and decomposed into small parts based on the adaptivek-cores method to predict protein-protein interactions associated with the complexes. The proposed method is adaptive to protein complexes with different structure, number, and size of nodes in a protein-protein interaction network. Based on different complex sets detected by various algorithms, we can obtain different prediction sets of protein-protein interactions. The reliability of the predicted interaction sets is proved by using estimations with statistical tests and direct confirmation of the biological data. In comparison with the approaches which predict the interactions based on the cliques, the overlap of the predictions is small. Similarly, the overlaps among the predicted sets of interactions derived from various complex sets are also small. Thus, every predicted set of interactions may complement and improve the quality of the original network data. Meanwhile, the predictions from the proposed method replenish protein-protein interactions associated with protein complexes using only the network topology.

scholarly journals Evolution of Protein-protein Interaction Networks in Duplication-Divergence Model

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Bui Phuong Thuy ◽  
Trinh Xuan Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Protein Interaction Networks ◽  
Interaction Networks ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Scale Free ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Living Organisms

Protein interacts with one another resulting in complex functions in living organisms. Like many other real-world networks, the networks of protein-protein interactions possess a certain degree of ordering, such as the scale-free property. The latter means that the probability $P$ to find a protein that interacts with $k$ other proteins follows a power law, $P(k) \sim k^{-\gamma}$. Protein interaction networks (PINs) have been studied by using a stochastic model, the duplication-divergence model, which is based on mechanisms of gene duplication and divergence during evolution. In this work, we show that this model can be used to fit experimental data on the PIN of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisae at two different time instances simultaneously. Our study shows that the evolution of PIN given by model is consistent with growing experimental data over time, and that the scale-free property of protein interaction network is robust against random deletion of interactions.

An efficient transient assays system using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of onion (Allium cepa) epidermal cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Miao Zhang ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Tao Wu
Keyword(s):  
Subcellular Localization ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Epidermal Cells ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Protein Subcellular Localization ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Efficient System ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Onion Epidermal Cells

In this study, the Agrobacterium infection medium, infection duration, detergent, and cell density were optimized. The sorghum-based infection medium (SbIM), 10-20 min infection time, addition of 0.01% Silwet L-77, and Agrobacterium optical density at 600 nm (OD600), improved the competence of onion epidermal cells to support Agrobacterium infection at >90% efficiency. Cyclin-dependent kinase D-2 (CDKD-2) and cytochrome c-type biogenesis protein (CYCH), protein-protein interactions were localized. The optimized procedure is a quick and efficient system for examining protein subcellular localization and protein-protein interaction.

scholarly journals Short loop functional commonality identified in leukaemia proteome highlights crucial protein sub-networks

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Sook Chung ◽  
Joseph C F Ng ◽  
Anna Laddach ◽  
N Shaun B Thomas ◽  
Franca Fraternali
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Ppi Networks ◽  
Short Loop ◽  
New Strategy ◽  
Loop Network ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction Network

Abstract Direct drug targeting of mutated proteins in cancer is not always possible and efficacy can be nullified by compensating protein–protein interactions (PPIs). Here, we establish an in silico pipeline to identify specific PPI sub-networks containing mutated proteins as potential targets, which we apply to mutation data of four different leukaemias. Our method is based on extracting cyclic interactions of a small number of proteins topologically and functionally linked in the Protein–Protein Interaction Network (PPIN), which we call short loop network motifs (SLM). We uncover a new property of PPINs named ‘short loop commonality’ to measure indirect PPIs occurring via common SLM interactions. This detects ‘modules’ of PPI networks enriched with annotated biological functions of proteins containing mutation hotspots, exemplified by FLT3 and other receptor tyrosine kinase proteins. We further identify functional dependency or mutual exclusivity of short loop commonality pairs in large-scale cellular CRISPR–Cas9 knockout screening data. Our pipeline provides a new strategy for identifying new therapeutic targets for drug discovery.

scholarly journals PIPINO: A Software Package to Facilitate the Identification of Protein-Protein Interactions from Affinity Purification Mass Spectrometry Data

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Stefan Kalkhof ◽  
Stefan Schildbach ◽  
Conny Blumert ◽  
Friedemann Horn ◽  
Martin von Bergen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Isotope Labeling ◽  
Affinity Purification ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Mass Spectrometry Data ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Binding Behavior ◽  
Bona Fide

The functionality of most proteins is regulated by protein-protein interactions. Hence, the comprehensive characterization of the interactome is the next milestone on the path to understand the biochemistry of the cell. A powerful method to detect protein-protein interactions is a combination of coimmunoprecipitation or affinity purification with quantitative mass spectrometry. Nevertheless, both methods tend to precipitate a high number of background proteins due to nonspecific interactions. To address this challenge the software Protein-Protein-Interaction-Optimizer (PIPINO) was developed to perform an automated data analysis, to facilitate the selection of bona fide binding partners, and to compare the dynamic of interaction networks. In this study we investigated the STAT1 interaction network and its activation dependent dynamics. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) was applied to analyze the STAT1 interactome after streptavidin pull-down of biotagged STAT1 from human embryonic kidney 293T cells with and without activation. Starting from more than 2,000 captured proteins 30 potential STAT1 interaction partners were extracted. Interestingly, more than 50% of these were already reported or predicted to bind STAT1. Furthermore, 16 proteins were found to affect the binding behavior depending on STAT1 phosphorylation such as STAT3 or the importin subunits alpha 1 and alpha 6.

Furan warheads for covalent trapping of weak protein-protein interactions: cross-linking of thymosin β4 to actin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laia Miret Casals ◽  
Willem Vannecke ◽  
Kurt Hoogewijs ◽  
Gianluca Arauz ◽  
Marina Gay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Thymosin Β4 ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Covalent Trapping

We describe furan as a triggerable ‘warhead’ for site-specific cross-linking using the actin and thymosin β4 (Tβ4)-complex as model of a weak and dynamic protein-protein interaction with known 3D structure...

Extracting Biological Significant Subnetworks from Protein-Protein Interactions Induced by Differentially Expressed Genes of HIV-1 Vpr Variants

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 35-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bandana Barman ◽  
Anirban Mukhopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Interaction Network ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Ppi Networks ◽  
Hiv 1

Identification of protein interaction network is very important to find the cell signaling pathway for a particular disease. The authors have found the differentially expressed genes between two sample groups of HIV-1. Samples are wild type HIV-1 Vpr and HIV-1 mutant Vpr. They did statistical t-test and found false discovery rate (FDR) to identify the genes increased in expression (up-regulated) or decreased in expression (down-regulated). In the test, the authors have computed q-values of test to identify minimum FDR which occurs. As a result they found 172 differentially expressed genes between their sample wild type HIV-1 Vpr and HIV-1 mutant Vpr, R80A. They found 68 up-regulated genes and 104 down-regulated genes. From the 172 differentially expressed genes the authors found protein-protein interaction network with string-db and then clustered (subnetworks) the PPI networks with cytoscape3.0. Lastly, the authors studied significance of subnetworks with performing gene ontology and also studied the KEGG pathway of those subnetworks.

Topological Analysis and Sub-Network Mining of Protein-Protein Interactions

2007 ◽  
pp. 209-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Wu ◽  
Xiaohua Hu
Keyword(s):  
Power Law ◽  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Topological Analysis ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Confidence Levels ◽  
Experimental Systems ◽  
Average Vertex

In this chapter, we report a comprehensive evaluation of the topological structure of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, by mining and analyzing graphs constructed from the popular data sets publicly available to the bioinformatics research community. We compare the topology of these networks across different species, different confidence levels, and different experimental systems used to obtain the interaction data. Our results confirm the well-accepted claim that the degree distribution follows a power law. However, further statistical analysis shows that residues are not independent on the fit values, indicating that the power law model may be inadequate. Our results also show that the dependence of the average clustering coefficient on the vertices degree is far from a power law, contradicting many published results. For the first time, we report that the average vertex density exhibits a strong powder law dependence on the vertices degree for the networks studied, regardless of species, confidence levels, and experimental systems. We also present an efficient and accurate approach to detecting a community in a protein-protein interaction network from a given seed protein. Our experimental results show strong structural and functional relationships among member proteins within each of the communities identified by our approach, as verified by MIPS complex catalog database and annotations.

scholarly journals HMNPPID—human malignant neoplasm protein–protein interaction database

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingqing Li ◽  
Zhihao Yang ◽  
Zhehuan Zhao ◽  
Ling Luo ◽  
Zhiheng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interaction ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Malignant Neoplasm ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Interaction Database ◽  
Protein Interaction Database

Abstract Background Protein–protein interaction (PPI) information extraction from biomedical literature helps unveil the molecular mechanisms of biological processes. Especially, the PPIs associated with human malignant neoplasms can unveil the biology behind these neoplasms. However, such PPI database is not currently available. Results In this work, a database of protein–protein interactions associated with 171 kinds of human malignant neoplasms named HMNPPID is constructed. In addition, a visualization program, named VisualPPI, is provided to facilitate the analysis of the PPI network for a specific neoplasm. Conclusions HMNPPID can hopefully become an important resource for the research on PPIs of human malignant neoplasms since it provides readily available data for healthcare professionals. Thus, they do not need to dig into a large amount of biomedical literatures any more, which may accelerate the researches on the PPIs of malignant neoplasms.

scholarly journals mCSM-PPI2: predicting the effects of mutations on protein–protein interactions

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (W1) ◽  
pp. W338-W344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos H M Rodrigues ◽  
Yoochan Myung ◽  
Douglas E V Pires ◽  
David B Ascher
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Interaction Network ◽  
Evolutionary Information ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Residue Interaction ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
Network Metrics

AbstractProtein–protein Interactions are involved in most fundamental biological processes, with disease causing mutations enriched at their interfaces. Here we present mCSM-PPI2, a novel machine learning computational tool designed to more accurately predict the effects of missense mutations on protein–protein interaction binding affinity. mCSM-PPI2 uses graph-based structural signatures to model effects of variations on the inter-residue interaction network, evolutionary information, complex network metrics and energetic terms to generate an optimised predictor. We demonstrate that our method outperforms previous methods, ranking first among 26 others on CAPRI blind tests. mCSM-PPI2 is freely available as a user friendly webserver at http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/mcsm_ppi2/.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document