Case Study on Gas Station Enviromental Qualitative Risk Assessment

Author(s):  
Cristina Jelescu ◽  
Carmen Dima ◽  
Camelia Draghici
Landslides ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fauziah Ahmad ◽  
Ahmad S. Yahaya ◽  
Molla Mohammad Ali ◽  
Siti H. A. Hairy

2014 ◽  
Vol 496 ◽  
pp. 122-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grazia Barberio ◽  
Simona Scalbi ◽  
Patrizia Buttol ◽  
Paolo Masoni ◽  
Serena Righi

GIS Business ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 43-53
Author(s):  
Eugenia Schmitt

The need to focus on banks funding structure and stress testing in an explicit way arose as a consequence of the crisis of past decades. Liquidity risks usually occur as a consequence of other kinds of risks, hence analysing scenarios in a prospective manner is essential for the assessment if the bank can fulfill its obligations as they come due and if its funding costs are appropriate. The structural liquidity risk and the degree of the liquidity mismatch can be measured based on the liquidity gap analysis, where expected cash-in- and outflows, divided in different time-buckets are depicted. The liquidity gap report (LGR) shows if a liquidity shortcoming appears in the future and how high is the amount a bank would have to pay, if any hedging were not possible. This paper shows how to build a comprehensive LGR which is the base for both, liquidity and wealth risk evaluation. To improve the accuracy of the forecast, the counterbalancing capacity will be incorporated into the LGR. This tool is a methodological basis for quantitative and qualitative risk assessment and stress testing.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael H. Azarian

Abstract As counterfeiting techniques and processes grow in sophistication, the methods needed to detect these parts must keep pace. This has the unfortunate effect of raising the costs associated with managing this risk. In order to ensure that the resources devoted to counterfeit detection are commensurate with the potential effects and likelihood of counterfeit part usage in a particular application, a risk based methodology has been adopted for testing of electrical, electronic, and electromechanical (EEE) parts by the SAE AS6171 set of standards. This paper provides an overview of the risk assessment methodology employed within AS6171 to determine the testing that should be utilized to manage the risk associated with the use of a part. A scenario is constructed as a case study to illustrate how multiple solutions exist to address the risk for a particular situation, and the choice of any specific test plan can be made on the basis of practical considerations, such as cost, time, or the availability of particular test equipment.


2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1264-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Slooten ◽  
David Fletcher ◽  
Barbara L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Xianwu ◽  
Qiu Jufei ◽  
Chen Bingrui ◽  
Zhang Xiaojie ◽  
Guo Haoshuang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document