The SD-prenucleolus for TU games

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Arin ◽  
I. Katsev
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (03) ◽  
pp. 1340016 ◽  
Author(s):  
SYLVAIN BEAL ◽  
AMANDINE GHINTRAN ◽  
ERIC REMILA ◽  
PHILIPPE SOLAL

The river sharing problem deals with the fair distribution of welfare resulting from the optimal allocation of water among a set of riparian agents. Ambec and Sprumont [Sharing a river, J. Econ. Theor. 107, 453–462] address this problem by modeling it as a cooperative TU-game on the set of riparian agents. Solutions to that problem are reviewed in this article. These solutions are obtained via an axiomatic study on the class of river TU-games or via a market mechanism.


Top ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 578-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theo S. H. Driessen ◽  
Anna B. Khmelnitskaya ◽  
Jordi Sales
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 1750029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Kongo

We provide axiomatic characterizations of the solutions of transferable utility (TU) games on the fixed player set, where at least three players exist. We introduce two axioms on players’ nullification. One axiom requires that the difference between the effect of a player’s nullification on the nullified player and on the others is relatively constant if all but one players are null players. Another axiom requires that a player’s nullification affects equally all of the other players. These two axioms characterize the set of all affine combinations of the equal surplus division and equal division values, together with the two basic axioms of efficiency and null game. By replacing the first axiom on players’ nullification with appropriate monotonicity axioms, we narrow down the solutions to the set of all convex combinations of the two values, or to each of the two values.


Game Theory ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Lawrence Diffo Lambo ◽  
Pierre Wambo

The solidarity value is a variant of the well-known Shapley value in which some sense of solidarity between the players is implemented allowing the disabled to receive help from the fortunate ones. We investigate on how fairly solidarity expenses are shared. We discuss the unwanted side effect of someone paying undue solidarity contributions as far as reversing his condition from a privileged to a needy person. A deeper case study is conducted for two classes of TU games that we obtain by modeling two real world business contexts. Here, we trace all player to player transfers of funds that arise when solidarity actions are processed, and we answer the question of who settles the solidarity bills. Also, we obtain the threshold position of a player below which he gets solidarity help, but above which he instead pays out donation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document