Long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defecation syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1287-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Ommer ◽  
Thomas M. Rolfs ◽  
Martin K. Walz
2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 592-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marsha A. Harris ◽  
Andrea Ferrara ◽  
Joseph Gallagher ◽  
Samuel DeJesus ◽  
Paul Williamson ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 397 (5) ◽  
pp. 771-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Köhler ◽  
Sigmar Stelzner ◽  
Gunter Hellmich ◽  
Dirk Lehmann ◽  
Thomas Jackisch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Claudio Fiorillo ◽  
Giuseppe Quero ◽  
Roberta Menghi ◽  
Caterina Cina ◽  
Vito Laterza ◽  
...  

Abstract Robotic surgery has progressively gained popularity in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, only a few studies on its oncologic effectiveness are currently present, with contrasting results. The purpose of this study is to report a single surgeon’s experience on robotic rectal resection (RRR) for cancer, focusing on the analysis of oncologic outcomes, both in terms of pathological features and long-term results. One-hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients who underwent RRR for rectal cancer from January 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients’ characteristics and perioperative outcomes were collected. The analyzed oncologic outcomes were pathological features [distal (DM), circumferential margin (CRM) status and quality of mesorectal excision (TME)] and long-term outcomes [overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)]. The mean operative time was 275 (± 60.5) minutes. Conversion rate was 6.6%. Complications occurred in 27 cases (22.1%) and reoperation was needed in 2 patients (1.5%). The median follow-up was 30.5 (5.9–86.1) months. None presented DM positivity. CRM positivity was 2.5% (2 cases) while a complete TME was reached in 94.3% of cases (115 patients). Recurrence rate was 5.7% (2 local, 4 distant and 1 local plus distant tumor relapse). OS and DFS were 90.7% and 83%, respectively. At the multivariate analysis, both CRM positivity and near complete/incomplete TME were recognized as negative prognostic factors for OS and DFS. Under appropriate logistic and operative conditions, robotic surgery for rectal cancer proves to be oncologically effective, with adequate pathological results and long-term outcomes. It also offers acceptable peri-operative outcomes, further confirming the safety and feasibility of the technique.


Author(s):  
M. F. Cherkasov ◽  
A. V. Dmitriev ◽  
V. S. Groshilin ◽  
S. V. Pereskokov ◽  
M. A. Kozyrevskiy ◽  
...  

Aim. To analyse and generalize available literature data on the problem of colorectal anastomotic leakage after rectal resection. Key findings. Over the last decade, there has been an increasing trend towards sphincter-preserving operations in modern colorectal surgery. The widespread use of suturing devices of various diameters allows the formation of ultra-low anastomoses (at the level of the pelvic floor). One of the menacing complications after rectal resection is anastomotic leakage, which frequency can reach 21%. The mortality from anastomotic leakage can reach 40%. The analysed literature sources discuss a variety of risk factors, both preoperative and intraoperative, affecting the healing of the inter-intestinal anastomosis. In almost all studies, the height of the tumour and the anastomosis from the anus, preoperative radiotherapy and male sex are independent risk factors for the development of colorectal anastomotic leakage. Concerning other factors, there are conflicting opinions. The timely use of preventive measures and early diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage can reduce the number and severity of postoperative complications.Conclusion. Individual consideration of risk factors and their adequate assessment in terms of possible complications are decisive in the choice of the extent of surgical intervention, which will undoubtedly improve the immediate and long-term results of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document