scholarly journals Placenta accreta spectrum disorders—experience of management in a German tertiary perinatal centre

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Bluth ◽  
Axel Schindelhauer ◽  
Katharina Nitzsche ◽  
Pauline Wimberger ◽  
Cahit Birdir
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Optimal Setting ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum ◽  
Management Approaches

Abstract Purpose Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders can cause major intrapartum haemorrhage. The optimal management approach is not yet defined. We analysed available cases from a tertiary perinatal centre to compare the outcome of different individual management strategies. Methods A monocentric retrospective analysis was performed in patients with clinically confirmed diagnosis of PAS between 07/2012 and 12/2019. Electronic patient and ultrasound databases were examined for perinatal findings, peripartum morbidity including blood loss and management approaches such as (1) vaginal delivery and curettage, (2) caesarean section with placental removal versus left in situ and (3) planned, immediate or delayed hysterectomy. Results 46 cases were identified with an incidence of 2.49 per 1000 births. Median diagnosis of placenta accreta (56%), increta (39%) or percreta (4%) was made in 35 weeks of gestation. Prenatal detection rate was 33% for all cases and 78% for placenta increta. 33% showed an association with placenta praevia, 41% with previous caesarean section and 52% with previous curettage. Caesarean section rate was 65% and hysterectomy rate 39%. In 9% of the cases, the placenta primarily remained in situ. 54% of patients required blood transfusion. Blood loss did not differ between cases with versus without prenatal diagnosis (p = 0.327). In known cases, an attempt to remove the placenta did not show impact on blood loss (p = 0.417). Conclusion PAS should be managed in an optimal setting and with a well-coordinated team. Experience with different approaches should be proven in prospective multicentre studies to prepare recommendations for expected and unexpected need for management.

scholarly journals One step conservative surgery: an approach to manage placenta accreta spectrum

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2884
Author(s):  
Soniya Dahiya ◽  
Pushpa Dahiya ◽  
Shweta Jain ◽  
Sunita .
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Conservative Surgery ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
One Step ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum ◽  
Labour Room ◽  
Caesarean Hysterectomy

The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has been arisen over past few decade, attributed to increasing caesarean section rate from 1:2500 to 1:500. Caesarean hysterectomy cases are increasing to prevent morbidity and mortality in PAS. The conservative approach for PAS is to prevent postpartum hemorrhage and to preserve the uterus. We present a case of placenta accreta spectrum where we had done one step conservative surgery. A 35year old woman G3P2A0 with 32 weeks of twin pregnancy with previous caesarean section with complaints of premature rupture of membrane was admitted in emergency labour room. Patient went into preterm labour on third day of admission and delivered two live preterm babies. Placenta could not be removed after delivery. Manual removal of placenta was tried but placenta could not be removed completely and bleeding was excessive after the procedure. Medical management of postpartum hemorrhage was done. On local examination there was no cervico-vaginal tear and laceration, upper segment of uterus appeared to be well contracted, lower segment ballooned up and bleeding was still excessive. Decision of emergency laparotomy was taken. Patient underwent emergency laparotomy for postpartum hemorrhage followed by segmental resection of invaded area, bleeding stop. Post operative period is uneventful.In young and low parity patient, one step conservative surgery can be considered a uterine preserving approach in the absence of placenta praevia.

scholarly journals The Choice of Anesthesia During Organ-Saving Operations Concerning Patients With Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-230
Author(s):  
E. N. Plakhotina ◽  
T. N. Belousova ◽  
I. A. Kulikov ◽  
R. V. Latyshev ◽  
K. M. Pavlyutina
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Epidural Anesthesia ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Tissue Perfusion ◽  
Optimal Method ◽  
Clear Trend ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum ◽  
Spectrum Disorders

Abstract Placenta accreta (PAS-disorders) is one of the most serious complications of pregnancy, associated with the risk of massive uterine bleeding, massive hemotransfusion and maternal mortality. Peripartum hysterectomy is a common treatment strategy for patients with placenta accreta. Currently, there is a clear trend of changing surgical tactics in favor of organ-saving operations, but there are no studies devoted to anesthesiological support of such operations.The aim of the study is to substantiate an effective and safe method of anaesthesia in organ-saving operations for placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Materia l and methods The study involved 80 patients with a diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders, confirmed intraoperatively, who underwent organ-saving operations. The patients were randomized depending on the method of anesthesia into 3 groups: general anesthesia, spinal anesthesia with planned conversion to general after fetal extraction and epidural anesthesia with planned conversion to general also after fetal extraction. The comparison of intraoperative hemodynamics, efficiency of tissue perfusion, efficiency of antinociceptive protection at the stages of surgery was performed. A comparative analysis of the volume of blood loss and blood transfusion, time of patients activation in the postoperative period, severity of pain on the first day after surgery, duration of hospital stay before discharge and comparison of the assessment of the newborn according to Apgar score at first and fifth minute after extraction.Conclusion The study shows that the optimal method of anesthesia in organ-saving operations for placenta accreta spectrum disorders is epidural anesthesia with its planned conversion to general anesthesia with an artificial lung ventilation after fetal extraction. Such an approach to anesthesia allows to maintain stable hemodynamic profile with minimal vasopressor support, sufficient heart performance, providing effective tissue perfusion and a high level of antinociceptive protection at the intraoperative stage and reduce the volume of intraoperative blood loss and hemotransfusion. In the current study there were no differences in neonatal outcomes and duration of hospitalization depending on the method of anesthesia. The advantage of epidural anesthesia with its conversion to general anesthesia was earlier activation after surgery and lower intensity of postoperative pain syndrome.

scholarly journals Analysis of repeat LSCS in a tertiary care centre

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1963
Author(s):  
M. Poovathi ◽  
Suilharsini T. S.
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Caesarean Section Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Set Up

Background: Caesarean section (CS) rates continue to increase worldwide, particularly in middle and high-income countries without evidence indicating substantial maternal and perinatal benefits from the increase and some studies showing negative consequences for maternal and neonatal health. The objective of this study is to analyse the repeat caesarean section rates in a tertiary centre.Methods: This is a retrospective study carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pudhukottai Medical College, Tamil Nadu, India for a 12-month period from January 2017 to December 2017 with the aim to analyse the rate and indications for caesarean section and to identify the measures to decrease its incidence if possible. A total of 2654 cesarean deliveries were conducted in one year, out of which 1380 (51.99%) were primary cesarean sections and 1274(48%) were repeat cesarean sections.Results: Repeat LSCS is more common in age group of 21-30 years (80%) and in second gravida (90.42%). The incidence of caesarean section is 94.6%. Patients who had successful trial of scar were 73. In all these patients, measures were taken to shorten the 2nd stage of labour either by giving episiotomy alone or by application of outlet forceps or vacuum. Out of these 62 (84.9%) patients were delivered by episiotomy alone.Conclusions: Caesarean section has become one of the commonly performed surgeries in obstetric practice. Implementation of standard labour management strategies can reduce primary caesarean section rate without compromising maternal and fetal safety. One important strategy is ROBSON ‘S 10 GROUP classification system for caesarean section needs to be adopted. Targets of care needs to be set up which also depends on the available resources and expertise. With continuous critical review as described and frequent comparison with other delivery units, the caesarean section rate in each individual unit can be reduced to an appropriate level.

Surgical advances in the management of placenta accreta spectrum: establishing new expectations for operative blood loss

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Liviu Cojocaru ◽  
Allison Lankford ◽  
Jessica Galey ◽  
Shobana Bharadwaj ◽  
Bhavani S. Kodali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum

Expectant management of retained abnormally adherent placenta complicated by uterine prolapse after vaginal delivery

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-162
Author(s):  
Nnabuike C Ngene ◽  
Amon Siveregi
Keyword(s):  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Uterine Prolapse ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Middle Income Countries ◽  
Adherent Placenta ◽  
Prenatal Imaging ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum

The placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) describes invasion and adherence of the placenta onto or beyond the myometrium. Prenatal imaging improves management outcomes. In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), however, the unavailability of ultrasonography in some health facilities delays the diagnosis, particularly if the prenatal period is asymptomatic. Following vaginal delivery, it often manifests as failure to remove a retained placenta manually. In the absence of haemorrhage, expectant management involving leaving the placenta in situ, is an option. In the presence of haemorrhage and/or sepsis, hysterectomy is usually recommended. We present a case of an expectantly managed PAS following a spontaneous preterm vaginal birth. The patient developed puerperal uterine prolapse with the placenta in situ, a previously unreported complication, but this was successfully reduced manually.

The role of ultrasound in prediction of intra-operative blood loss in cases of placenta accreta spectrum disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 302 (5) ◽  
pp. 1143-1150
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Hussein ◽  
Mohamed Momtaz ◽  
Ahmad Elsheikhah ◽  
Ahmed Abdelbar ◽  
Ahmed Kamel
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum ◽  
Spectrum Disorders

scholarly journals A new scoring system for placement of abdominal aortic balloon in Placenta accreta spectrum patients with placenta previa: A retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusen Huang ◽  
Jingjie Wang ◽  
Qiuju Xiong ◽  
Wenjian Wang ◽  
Yi Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Placenta Accreta ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Balloon Occlusion ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Placenta Accreta Spectrum ◽  
New Scoring

Abstract Background In recent years, abdominal aortic balloon occlusion is considered an effective method for placenta accreta spectrum patients with placenta previa. However, not all patients in this category require abdominal aortic balloon placement. This study aims to investigate whether the new scoring system is effective for the placement of the abdominal aortic balloon in Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS)patients with placenta previa. Methods PAS patients with placenta previa diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasound were included, and divided into three groups according to their scores graded by a new scoring system (grade Ⅰ group ≤ 5 points, 6 points ≤ grade Ⅱ group ≤ 9 points, grade Ⅲ group ≥ 10 points). Patients with grade Ⅲ were placed with an abdominal aortic balloon unless their families and patients strongly refused. Those with grade I were not placed with an abdominal aortic balloon. Those with grade II generally were not placed with an abdominal aortic balloon unless their families and patients strongly request. Indicators were analyzed, including postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion requirements, operation time, and the ability to preserve the uterus and fertility. Results Estimated blood loss, the number of intraoperative transfused patients, postoperative days were different among the three groups. In group 2 (grade II), there was no significant difference in other observation indexes༈intraoperative blood loss 629 ± 214 vs 758 ± 749, P = 0.488, packed red blood cells47 ± 194 vs 154 ± 445, P = 0.488, admission to ICU 0/7 vs 3/71, P = 1.000, total hysterectomies 0/7 vs 2/71, P = 1.000༉(except for the operation time81.4 ± 19.5 vs 61.7 ± 30.6, P = 0.013) between the abdominal aortic balloon and non-abdominal aortic balloon groups. In group 3 (grade III), significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss (950 ± 390 vs 2238 ± 1052, P༜0.001), packed red blood cells(213 ± 311 vs 662 ± 528, P༜0.001), postoperative blood transfusion volume(105 ± 181 vs 300 ± 321, P = 0.008), operation time(90.0 ± 25.9 vs 115.9 ± 45.3, P = 0.013), the proportion of people who need blood transfusion(14 in the IABO vs 11 in the NIABO, P = 0.002) and the total Hysterectomies (0 in the IABO vs 2 in the NIABO, P = 0.011) between the abdominal aortic balloon and non-abdominal aortic balloon groups. Conclusion With the new scoring system, not all patients with PAS and placenta previa need a preventive temporary balloon occlusion of the subrenal abdominal aorta. We recommend placing an abdominal aortic balloon in patients with grade III, for it can control intraoperative bleeding and reduce intraoperative blood transfusion, and reduce the risk of hysterectomy. For patients with grade I and II, abdominal aortic balloon placement is not recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document