Bone marrow FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin lymphoma revisited: do imaging and pathology match?

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo J. A. Adams ◽  
Thomas C. Kwee ◽  
Rob Fijnheer ◽  
Steven V. Dubois ◽  
Rutger A. J. Nievelstein ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa ◽  
Bettina Altmann ◽  
Gerhard Held ◽  
Stephanie Angel ◽  
Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is the standard for staging aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Limited data from prospective studies is available to determine whether initial staging by FDG PET/CT provides treatment-relevant information of bone marrow (BM) involvement (BMI) and thus could spare BM biopsy (BMB). Methods Patients from PETAL (NCT00554164) and OPTIMAL>60 (NCT01478542) with aggressive B-cell NHL initially staged by FDG PET/CT and BMB were included in this pooled analysis. The reference standard to confirm BMI included a positive BMB and/or FDG PET/CT confirmed by targeted biopsy, complementary imaging (CT or magnetic resonance imaging), or concurrent disappearance of focal FDG-avid BM lesions with other lymphoma manifestations during immunochemotherapy. Results Among 930 patients, BMI was detected by BMB in 85 (prevalence 9%) and by FDG PET/CT in 185 (20%) cases, for a total of 221 cases (24%). All 185 PET-positive cases were true positive, and 709 of 745 PET-negative cases were true negative. For BMB and FDG PET/CT, sensitivity was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32–45%) and 84% (CI: 78–88%), specificity 100% (CI: 99–100%) and 100% (CI: 99–100%), positive predictive value 100% (CI: 96–100%) and 100% (CI: 98–100%), and negative predictive value 84% (CI: 81–86%) and 95% (CI: 93–97%), respectively. In all of the 36 PET-negative cases with confirmed BMI patients had other adverse factors according to IPI that precluded a change of standard treatment. Thus, the BMB would not have influenced the patient management. Conclusion In patients with aggressive B-cell NHL, routine BMB provides no critical staging information compared to FDG PET/CT and could therefore be omitted. Trial registration NCT00554164 and NCT01478542


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5979
Author(s):  
Janet Denise Reed ◽  
Andries Masenge ◽  
Ane Buchner ◽  
Fareed Omar ◽  
David Reynders ◽  
...  

Lymphoma is the third most common paediatric cancer. Early detection of high-risk patients is necessary to anticipate those who require intensive therapy and follow-up. Current literature shows that residual tumor avidity on PET (Positron Emission Tomography) following chemotherapy corresponds with decreased survival. However, the value of metabolic parameters has not been adequately investigated. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic and other parameters in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma. We recorded tMTV (total Metabolic Tumor Volume), TLG (Total Lesion Glycolysis), and SUVmax (maximum Standard Uptake Value) on baseline PET, as well the presence of bone marrow or visceral involvement. HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) status and baseline biochemistry from clinical records were noted. All patients received stage-specific standard of care therapy. Response assessment on end-of-treatment PET was evaluated according to the Deauville criteria. We found that bone marrow involvement (p = 0.028), effusion (p < 0.001), and treatment response (p < 0.001) on baseline PET, as well as HIV status (p = 0.036) and baseline haemoglobin (p = 0.039), were significantly related to progression-free survival (PFS), whereas only effusion (p = 0.017) and treatment response (p = 0.050) were predictive of overall survival (OS). Only baseline tMTV predicted treatment response (p = 0.017). This confirms the value of F-18 FDG PET/CT (Fluoro-deoxy-glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography) in prognostication in paediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma; however, further studies are required to define the significance of metabolic parameters.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. e267-e273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelina Cistaro ◽  
Laura Cassalia ◽  
Cinzia Ferrara ◽  
Natale Quartuccio ◽  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-357
Author(s):  
Merih Reis Aras ◽  
Murat Albayrak ◽  
Abdulkerim Yıldız ◽  
Senem Maral ◽  
Hacer Berna Afacan Öztürk ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa ◽  
Bettina Altmann ◽  
Gerhard Held ◽  
Stephanie Angel ◽  
Stephan Stilgenbauer ◽  
...  

Abstract PURPOSEFluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) is the standard for staging aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Limited data from prospective studies is available to determine whether initial staging by FDG PET/CT provides treatment-relevant information of bone marrow (BM) involvement (BMI) and thus could spare BM biopsy (BMB).METHODSPatients from PETAL (NCT00554164) and OPTIMAL>60 (NCT01478542) with aggressive B-cell NHL initially staged by FDG PET/CT and BMB were included in this pooled analysis. The reference standard to confirm BMI included a positive BMB and/or FDG PET/CT confirmed by targeted biopsy, complementary imaging (CT or magnetic resonance imaging), or concurrent disappearance of focal FDG-avid BM lesions with other lymphoma manifestations during immunochemotherapy.RESULTSAmong 930 patients, BMI was detected by BMB in 85 (prevalence 9%) and by FDG PET/CT in 185 (20%) cases, for a total of 221 cases (24%). All 185 PET-positive cases were true positive, and 709 of 745 PET-negative cases were true negative. For BMB and FDG PET/CT, sensitivity was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32%-45%) and 84% (CI: 78%-88%), specificity 100% (CI: 99%-100%) and 100% (CI: 99%-100%), positive predictive value 100% (CI: 96%-100%) and 100% (CI: 98%-100%), and negative predictive value 84% (CI: 81%-86%) and 95% (CI: 93%-97%), respectively. In all of the 36 PET-negative cases with confirmed BMI patients had other adverse factors according to IPI that precluded a change of standard treatment. Thus, the BMB would not have influenced the patient management.CONCLUSIONIn patients with aggressive B-cell NHL, routine BMB provides no critical staging information compared to FDG PET/CT and could therefore be omitted. Trial registration numberPETAL study, NCT00554164, registered 6 November 2007OPTIMAL>60 study, NCT01478542, registered 23 November 2011


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document