F-18 FDG PET/CT Imaging in Normal Variants, Pitfalls and Artifacts in the Abdomen and Pelvis

Since its introduction into clinical practice, multimodality imaging has revolutionized diagnostic imaging for both oncologic and non-oncologic pathologies. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT imaging which takes advantage of increased anaerobic glycolysis that occurs in tumor cells (Warburg effect) has gained significant clinical relevance in the management of most, if not all oncologic conditions. Because FDG is taken by both normal and abnormal tissues, PET/CT imaging may demonstrate several normal variants and imaging pitfalls. These may ultimately impact disease detection and diagnostic accuracy. Imaging specialists (nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists) must demonstrate a thorough understanding of normal and physiologic variants in the distribution of 18F-FDG; including potential imaging pitfalls and technical artifacts to minimize misinterpretation of images. The normal physiologic course of 18F-FDG results in a variable degree of uptake in the stomach, liver, spleen, small and large bowel. Urinary excretion results in renal, ureteric, and urinary bladder uptake. Technical artifacts can occur due to motion, truncation as well as the effects of contrast agents and metallic hardware. Using pictorial illustrations, this paper aims to describe the variants of physiologic 18F-FDG uptake that may mimic pathology as well as potential benign conditions that may result in misinterpretation of PET/CT images in common oncologic conditions of the abdomen and pelvis.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Should We Improve the Thresholds?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third highest cause of cancer-related mortality, and liver transplantation is the ideal treatment for this disease. The Milan criteria provided the opportunity for HCC patients to undergo LT with favorable outcomes and have been the international gold standard and benchmark. With the accumulation of data, however, the Milan criteria are not regarded as too restrictive. After the implementation of the Milan criteria, many extended criteria have been proposed, which increases the limitations regarding the morphological tumor burden, and incorporates the tumor’s biological behavior using surrogate markers. The paradigm for the patient selection for LT appears to be shifting from morphologic criteria to a combination of biologic, histologic, and morphologic criteria, and to the establishment of a model for predicting post-transplant recurrence and outcomes. This review article aims to characterize the various patient selection criteria for LT, with reference to several surrogate markers for the biological behavior of HCC (e.g., AFP, PIVKA-II, NLR, 18F-FDG PET/CT, liquid biopsy), and the response to locoregional therapy. Furthermore, the allocation rules in each country and the present evidence on the role of down-staging large tumors are addressed.