scholarly journals Anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy for objective patellar instability

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pautasso ◽  
L. Sabatini ◽  
M. Capella ◽  
F. Saccia ◽  
L. Rissolio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Sport Activity ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Tibial Tuberosity ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Sports Activity ◽  
Redislocation Rate ◽  
Patellar Stability

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients treated with anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO). Correlations between patient's age, gender, pre-injury physical activity and the achieved results were investigated as secondary endpoints. Methods An observational retrospective study with prospective collected data was performed. Inclusion criteria were: treatment with anatomic MPFL reconstruction with gracilis tendon according to Schӧttle’s technique performed between 2011 and 2017; associated TTO as unique accessory procedure; skeletal joint maturity; a minimum follow-up of 12 months after surgery. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner scores. Results Forty patients (42 knees) were included, 64% of them underwent TTO. The Kujala score significantly improved from 47.4 ± 17.6 preoperatively to 89.4 ± 13.6 postoperatively (p < 0.01). The average Lysholm score was 45.6 ± 20.5 preoperatively: it showed a significant increase to 89.8 ± 12.8 postoperatively (p < 0.01). Pre-injury mean Tegner was 5.9 ± 1.8, while it dropped to 3.0 ± 1.6 after injury. After surgery, Tegner resulted 4.9 ± 1.6. Forty-three percent of patients regained the pre-injury sport activity level. Redislocation rate was 2.4%. Conclusion Anatomic MPFL reconstruction allows excellent patellar stability recovery, knee functionality improvement, return to Activities of Daily Living and a low redislocation rate. Better results were achieved in younger (under 30 years old) and higher sports activity-level subjects. The TTO association provided clinical results comparable to isolated MPFL reconstructions, suggesting that the two procedures can be safely accomplished together without affecting the positive outcomes. Level of evidence Level IV.

Clinical Comparison of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With or Without Tibial Tuberosity Transfer for Recurrent Patellar Instability

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110377
Author(s):  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Jae-Ang Sim ◽  
HongYeol Yang ◽  
Young-Mo Kim ◽  
Joon-Ho Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patellar Instability ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tuberosity ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Trochlear Groove ◽  
Functional Failure ◽  
Radiological Parameters ◽  
Recurrent Patellar Instability

Background: No clear guidelines or widespread consensus has defined a threshold value of tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance for choosing the appropriate surgical procedures when additional tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO) should be added to augment medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes between MPFL reconstruction and MPFL reconstruction with TTO for patients who have patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 81 patients who underwent surgical treatment using either MPFL reconstruction or MPFL reconstruction with TTO for recurrent patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm; the mean follow-up was 25.2 months (range, 12.0-53.0 months). The patients were divided into 2 groups: isolated MPFL reconstruction (iMPFL group; n = 36) performed by 2 surgeons and MPFL reconstruction with TTO (TTO group; n = 45) performed by another 2 surgeons. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kujala score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Tegner activity score. Radiological parameters, including patellar height, TT-TG distance, patellar tilt, and congruence angle were compared between the 2 groups. Functional failure based on clinical apprehension sign, repeat subluxation or dislocation, and subjective instability and complications was assessed at the final follow-up. We also compared clinical outcomes based on subgroups of preoperative TT-TG distance (15 mm ≤ TT-TG ≤ 20 mm vs 20 mm < TT-TG ≤ 25 mm). Results: All of the clinical outcome parameters significantly improved in both groups at the final follow-up ( P < .001), with no significant differences between groups. The radiological parameters also showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. The incidence of functional failure was similar between the 2 groups (3 failures in the TTO group and 2 failures in the iMPFL group; P = .42). In the TTO group, 1 patient experienced a repeat dislocation postoperatively and 2 patients had subjective instability; in the iMPFL group, 2 patients had subjective instability. The prevalence of complications did not differ between the 2 groups ( P = .410). In the subgroup analysis based on TT-TG distance, we did not note any differences in clinical outcomes between iMPFL and TTO groups in subgroups of 15 mm ≤ TT-TG ≤ 20 mm and 20 mm < TT-TG ≤ 25 mm. Conclusion: MPFL reconstruction with and without TTO provided similar, satisfactory clinical outcomes and low redislocation rates for patients who had patellar instability with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm, without statistical difference. Thus, our findings suggest that iMPFL reconstruction is a safe and reliable treatment for patients with recurrent patellar dislocation with a TT-TG distance of 15 to 25 mm, without the disadvantages derived from TTO.

scholarly journals Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 263502542110408
Author(s):  
Margaret L. Wright ◽  
Ryan W. Paul ◽  
Kevin B. Freedman
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Cartilage Defects ◽  
Active Population ◽  
Diagnostic Arthroscopy ◽  
Patellar Stability

Background: Patellar instability is a relatively common condition in the young, active population and causes disruption of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). MPFL reconstruction is often performed to restore this medial stabilizer and reduce the risk of recurrent instability. Indications: Isolated MPFL reconstruction has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrent patellar dislocation. It is indicated in our patients who have had more than 1 dislocation in the absence of other significant bony malalignment or cartilage defects that require concurrent surgery. Technique Description: Diagnostic arthroscopy is first performed to evaluate the patellar and trochlear cartilage surfaces. A medial approach to the patella is then performed and the 2 free limbs of the allograft are secured to the patella at the 9 to 11 (or 1 to 3) o’clock position. A small approach to the femoral insertion site of the MPFL is performed and confirmed with fluoroscopy, and the graft is secured to the femur with a biotenodesis screw. Postoperative examination confirms improved stability of the patella, and the patient performs a gradual return to play protocol. Results: Recent studies have demonstrated overall good clinical outcomes after MPFL reconstruction, with improved patellar stability and high patient satisfaction. One systematic review found an 85% rate of return to sport with a low risk (7%) of recurrent subluxation or dislocation. Discussion/Conclusion: MPFL reconstruction is a reliable option for improving patellar stability in patients with recurrent dislocations. We believe our technique, which optimizes the fixation and footprint of the graft on the patella and allows for easy visualization of femoral anatomy on fluoroscopy, can improve the reproducibility of the procedure and provide optimal clinical outcomes.

Patellar Redislocation Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Suture Anchor Versus Double Transpatellar Tunnel Fixation

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1254-1262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Won Heo ◽  
Kyung-Han Ro ◽  
Dae-Hee Lee
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Suture Anchor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Fixation Methods ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Redislocation Rate

Background: Few studies to date have compared clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using the suture anchor and double transpatellar tunnel fixation methods. This meta-analysis therefore compared the clinical results, including the patellar redislocation rate and improvement in functional scores, of suture anchor and double transpatellar tunnel fixation. Hypothesis: The recurrence rate and improvement in functional outcomes after surgery would be similar using the suture anchor and double transpatellar tunnel fixation methods. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Methods: Studies evaluating MPFL reconstruction using either the suture anchor or double transpatellar tunnel technique for patellar site fixation were included if they reported the patellar redislocation rate after surgery and/or validated patient-reported outcomes such as the Kujala and Lysholm scores. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in this meta-analysis. The mean patellar redislocation rates were similar using the suture anchor (3.2% [95% CI, 1.6%-6.2%]) and double transpatellar tunnel (3.4% [95% CI, 2.1%-5.4%]) techniques ( P = .879). The mean improvement in the Kujala score from before to after MPFL reconstruction was greater using the suture anchor (37.2 [95% CI, 31.1-43.4]) method than the double transpatellar tunnel method (28.7 [95% CI, 21.2-36.1]) ( P = .018). However, the mean improvement in the Lysholm score did not differ significantly using the 2 techniques. Conclusion: The patellar redislocation rate did not differ significantly in patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction using the suture anchor and double transpatellar tunnel fixation methods. The suture anchor fixation method, however, resulted in a greater degree of improvement in patient-reported outcomes.

scholarly journals Comparable outcome for autografts and allografts in primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Migliorini ◽  
Andromahi Trivellas ◽  
Jörg Eschweiler ◽  
Matthias Knobe ◽  
Markus Tingart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Feasible Alternative ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Persistent Instability

Abstract Purpose This study updates the current evidence on the role of allografts versus autografts for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability. Methods The study was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. In March 2021, a literature search in the main online databases was performed. Studies reporting quantitative data concerning primary MPFL reconstruction using an allograft were considered for inclusion. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected articles. Results Data from 12 studies (474 procedures) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 42.2 (15–78.5) months. The mean age was 21.1 ± 6.2 years. 64.9% (285 of 439) of patients were female. At the last follow-up, the Tegner (p < 0.0001), Kujala (p = 0.002) and the Lysholm (p < 0.0001) scores were minimally greater in the autografts. The similarity was found in the rate of persistent instability sensation and revision. The allograft group evidenced a lower rate of re-dislocations (p = 0.003). Conclusion Allografts may represent a feasible alternative to traditional autograft for MPFL reconstruction in selected patients with patellofemoral instability. Allograft tendons yielded similar PROMs, rates of persistent instability, and revision. Allograft reconstructions tended to have modestly lower re-dislocation rates. Level of evidence IV.

The influence of risk factors on clinical outcomes following anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction using the gracilis tendon

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Wagner ◽  
Florian Pfalzer ◽  
Swen Hingelbaum ◽  
Jochen Huth ◽  
Frieder Mauch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Gracilis Tendon

Ability of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction to Overcome Lateral Patellar Motion in the Presence of Trochlear Flattening: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110410
Author(s):  
Amrit V. Vinod ◽  
Alex M. Hollenberg ◽  
Melissa A. Kluczynski ◽  
John M. Marzo
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Biomechanical Study ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Trochlear Groove ◽  
Sulcus Angle ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Patellar Stability

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is an established operative procedure to restore medial restraining force in patients with patellar instability. In the setting of a shallow sulcus, it is unclear whether an isolated MPFL reconstruction is sufficient to restore patellofemoral stability. Hypothesis: Progressively increasing the sulcus angle would have an adverse effect on the ability of an MPFL reconstruction to restrain lateral patellar motion. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were harvested and prepared for experimentation. Each specimen was run through the following test conditions: native, lateral retinacular release, lateral retinacular repair, MPFL release, MPFL reconstruction, and MPFL reconstruction with trochlear flattening. Four 3-dimensional printed wedges (10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) were created to insert beneath the native trochlea to raise the sulcus angle incrementally and simulate progressive trochlear flattening. For each test condition, the knee was positioned at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° of flexion, and the force required to displace the patella 1 cm laterally at 10 mm/s was measured. Group comparisons were made with repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: In the setting of an MPFL reconstruction, as the trochlear groove was incrementally flattened, the force required to laterally displace the patella progressively decreased. A 10° increase in the sulcus angle significantly reduced the force at 15° ( P = .01) and 30° ( P = .03) of knee flexion. The force required to laterally displace the patella was also significantly lower at all knee flexion angles after the addition of the 20°, 30°, and 40° wedges ( P≤ .05). Specifically, a 20° increase in the sulcus angle reduced the force by 29% to 36%; a 30° increase, by 35% to 43%; and a 40° increase, by 40% to 47%. Conclusion: Despite an MPFL reconstruction, the force required to laterally displace the patella decreased as the sulcus angle was increased in our cadaveric model. Clinical Relevance: An isolated MPFL reconstruction may not be sufficient to restore patellar stability in the setting of a shallow or flat trochlea. Patients with an abnormal sulcus angle may have recurrent instability postoperatively if treated with an isolated MPFL reconstruction.

scholarly journals Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 232596712094565
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Shultz ◽  
Samuel N. Schrader ◽  
Benjamin D. Packard ◽  
Daniel C. Wascher ◽  
Gehron P. Treme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Knee Flexion ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Tibial Tubercle ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Diagnostic Arthroscopy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Arthroscopic Procedures

Background: Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined. Purpose: To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded. Results: Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy. Conclusion: Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clear benefits in patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Failure Analysis in Patients With Patellar Redislocation After Primary Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596712092617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias J. Feucht ◽  
Julian Mehl ◽  
Philipp Forkel ◽  
Andrea Achtnich ◽  
Andreas Schmitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament ◽  
Femoral Tunnel ◽  
Trochlear Dysplasia ◽  
Patellofemoral Instability ◽  
Tibial Tuberosity ◽  
Mpfl Reconstruction ◽  
Tunnel Position ◽  
Femoral Tunnel Position ◽  
Valgus Malalignment

Background: Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become a popular surgical procedure to address patellofemoral instability. As a consequence of the growing number of MPFL reconstructions performed, a higher rate of failures and revision procedures has been seen. Purpose: To perform a failure analysis in patients with patellar redislocation after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients undergoing revision surgery for reinstability after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction were included. Clinical notes were reviewed to collect demographic data, information on the primary surgery, and the mechanism of patellar redislocation (traumatic vs nontraumatic). Preoperative imaging was analyzed regarding femoral tunnel position and the prevalence of anatomic risk factors (ARFs) associated with patellofemoral instability: trochlear dysplasia (types B through D), patella alta (Caton-Deschamps index >1.2, patellotrochlear index <0.28), lateralization of the tibial tuberosity (tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance >20 mm, tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament [TT-PCL] distance >24 mm), valgus malalignment (mechanical valgus axis >5°), and torsional deformity (internal femoral torsion >25°, external tibial torsion >35°). The prevalence of ARF was compared between patients with traumatic and nontraumatic redislocations and between patients with anatomic and nonanatomic femoral tunnel position. Results: A total of 26 patients (69% female) with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years were included. The cause of redislocation was traumatic in 31% and nontraumatic in 69%. Position of the femoral tunnel was considered nonanatomic in 50% of patients. Trochlear dysplasia was the most common ARF with a prevalence of 50%, followed by elevated TT-PCL distance (36%) and valgus malalignment (35%). The median number of ARFs per patient was 3 (range, 0-6), and 65% of patients had 2 or more ARFs. Patients with nontraumatic redislocations showed significantly more ARFs per patient, and the presence of 2 or more ARFs was significantly more common in this group. No significant difference was observed between patients with anatomic versus nonanatomic femoral tunnel position. Conclusion: Multiple anatomic risk factors and femoral tunnel malposition are commonly observed in patients with reinstability after primary MPFL reconstruction. Before revision surgery, a focused clinical examination and adequate imaging including radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standing full-leg radiographs, and torsional measurement with computed tomography or MRI are recommended to assess all relevant anatomic parameters to understand an individual patient’s risk profile. During revision surgery, care must be taken to ensure anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel through use of anatomic and/or radiographic landmarks.

Snowboarder's Talus Fracture

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 871-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Valderrabano ◽  
Thomas Perren ◽  
Christian Ryf ◽  
Paavo Rillmann ◽  
Beat Hintermann
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Subtalar Joint ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Sport Activity ◽  
Treatment Algorithm ◽  
Activity Level ◽  
Talus Fracture ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Lateral Process

Background Fracture of the lateral process of the talus is a typical snowboarding injury. Basic data are limited, particularly with respect to treatment and outcome. Hypothesis As the axial-loaded dorsiflexed foot becomes externally rotated and/or everted, fracture of the lateral process of the talus occurs. Primary surgical treatment may improve the outcome of this injury, reducing the risk of secondary subtalar joint osteoarthritis. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods We recorded details of the treatment and evaluation of 20 patients (8 female and 12 male; age at trauma, 29 years [range, 17-48 years]) who sustained a lateral process of the talus fracture while snowboarding. The injury pathomechanism was documented. The patients were treated either nonsurgically or surgically based on a fracture-type treatment algorithm. The evaluation at most recent follow-up (mean, 42 months [range, 26-53 months]) included clinical and functional examination, follow-up of sport activity, and radiological assessment (radiograph, computed tomography scan). Results The injury mechanism included axial impact (100%), dorsiflexion (95%), external rotation (80%), and eversion (45%). Using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot score, the patients obtained a mean of 93 points; the surgically treated group (n = 14) scored higher (97 points) than did the nonoperative group (n = 6; 85 points) (P <. 05). Degenerative disease of the subtalar joint was found in 3 patients (15%; operative, 1 patient; nonoperative, 2 patients). All but 4 (20%, all after nonsurgical treatment) patients reached the same sport activity level as before injury. Conclusion The snowboarding-related lateral process of the talus fracture represents a complex hindfoot injury. In type II fractures, primary surgical treatment has led to achieving better outcomes, reducing sequelae, and allowing patients to regain the same sports activity level as before injury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document