Surgical treatment of the bony mallet thumb: a case series and literature review

Introduction The aim of this study was to provide a more precise statement on the outcome after surgical treatment of a bony mallet thumb and possibly give a treatment recommendation regarding the surgical fixation method. Patients and methods All patients (n = 16) who underwent a surgical treatment for an acute bony mallet thumb fracture between January 2006 and July 2019 were enrolled. The surgical method, complications, the range of motion, tip pinch, lateral key pinch, overall grip strength, visual analog score, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score, Mayo Wrist Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Buck-Gramcko Score and radiologic parameters were evaluated. Further, a comprehensive literature search on PubMed was conducted covering a period from 1956 to 2021 to include all possible matching articles on the treatment of the bony mallet thumb (n = 21 articles). Results Surgical treatment was very inhomogenous including indirect and direct K-wire fixation, screw fixation, plate fixation and anchor fixation methods. The IP joint range of motion and thumb strength ranged from 66 to 94% in comparison to the contralateral side. An open reduction led to worse functional scores compared to a closed reduction. Treatment methods in the literature were also very inhomogenous with a very low patient count, often even pooling data of bony mallet thumb fractures with bony mallet finger fractures. The risk for infection was higher in K-wire fixation methods than in open reduction and internal fixation methods. Conclusion The evidence for the best treatment of a bony mallet thumb fracture is low. On one hand the functional outcome can be inferior using an open reduction approach, but on the other hand, K-wire fixation methods with a closed reduction approach showed a higher risk for infection. Future multi-center research must be conducted to find the best treatment procedure for the best outcome of the patient.

Biomechanical analysis of two medial buttress plate fixation methods to treat Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures

Background Femoral neck fractures in young people are usually Pauwels Type III fractures. The common treatment method are multiple parallel cannulated screws or dynamic hip screw sliding compression fixation. Due to the huge shear stress, the rate of complications such as femoral head necrosis and nonunion is still high after treatment. The aim of our study was to compare the stabilities of two fixation methods in fixating pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. Methods All biomimetic fracture samples are fixed with three cannulated screws combined with a medial buttress plate. There were two fixation groups for the buttress plate and proximal fracture fragment: Group A, long screw (40 mm); Group B, short screw (6 mm). Samples were subjected to electrical strain measurement under a load of 500 N, axial stiffness was measured, and then the samples were axially loaded until failure. More than 5 mm of displacement or synthetic bone fracture was considered as construct failure. Results There were no significant differences in failure load (P = 0.669), stiffness (P = 0.842), or strain distribution (P > 0.05) between the two groups. Conclusions Unicortical short screws can provide the same stability as long screws for Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fractures.

Establishment of a Finite Element Model and Biomechanical Analysis of Different Fixation Methods for Total Talar Prosthesis Replacement

The full text of this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors due to author disagreement with the posting of the preprint. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as a reference. Questions should be directed to the corresponding author.

In-line Pullout Strength of 2 Acetabular Fixation Methods for Ligamentum Teres Reconstruction of the Hip: A Cadaveric Study

Background: Ligamentum teres (LT) reconstruction is an appropriate alternative in select cases of LT full-thickness tears, resulting in hip micro- or macroinstability. Graft fixation at the acetabular fossa is critical to achieving the best functional results. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the pullout strength of 2 graft fixation methods used for LT reconstruction of the hip. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In 7 cadaveric specimens, the acetabular socket was prepared after the native LT was transected and the femoral head was removed. Seven separate tibialis anterior grafts were then prepared by suturing a running-locking No. 2 suture on each tail of the graft. Three specimens had fixation of the graft to the acetabulum using an adjustable cortical suspension suture button; the remaining 4 were fixed to the acetabulum using a knotless suture anchor. Specimens were then mounted onto a custom jig within a mechanical test frame to allow for the in-line pull of the graft fixation construct. After a preload of 5 N, each specimen was loaded to failure at 0.5 mm/s. Stiffness and load to failure were measured for each specimen construct. Results: Suture button fixation had a higher mean load to failure when compared with the knotless anchor fixation method (mean ± SD, 438.1 ± 114.3 vs 195.9 ± 50.0 N; P = .01). There was no significant difference in mean stiffness between the methods of fixation (24.5 ± 1.4 vs 26.5 ± 5.8 N/mm; P = .6). Conclusion: In this cadaveric study, the suture button fixation demonstrated greater load to failure than the knotless anchor fixation. Clinical Relevance: Results of this study can guide surgical decision making when selecting an acetabular fixation method for LT reconstruction.

Tacks vs. sutures: a biomechanical analysis of sacral bony fixation methods for laparoscopic apical fixations in the porcine model

Purpose There is a novel surgical procedure, called cervicosacropexy (CESA) and vaginosacropexy (VASA) to treat pelvic organ prolapse and a concomitant urgency and mixed urinary incontinence. As there is little experience with the tapes so far and literature is scanty, the aim of this study was to investigate biomechanical properties for the fixation of the PVDF-tapes with three different fixation methods in context of apical fixations. Methods Evaluation was performed on porcine, fresh cadaver sacral spines. A total of 40 trials, divided into 4 subgroups, was performed on the anterior longitudinal ligament. Recorded biomechanical properties were displacement at failure, maximum load and stiffness in terms of the primary endpoints. The failure mode was a secondary endpoint. Group 4 was a reference group to compare single sutures on porcine tissue with those on human tissue. Biomechanical parameters for single sutures on the human anterior longitudinal ligament were evaluated in a previous work by Hachenberg et al. Results The maximum load for group 1 (two single sutures) was 65 ± 12 N, for group 2 (three titanium tacks arranged in a row) it was 25 ± 10 N and for group 3 (three titanium tacks arranged in a triangle) it was 38 ± 12 N. There was a significant difference between all three groups. The most common failure mode was a “mesh failure” in 9/10 trials for groups 1–3. Conclusion The PVDF-tape fixation with two single sutures endures 2.6 times more load than titanium tacks arranged in a row and 1.7 times more load than titanium tacks arranged in a triangle. The presacral fixation with titanium tacks reduced surgical time compared to the fixation with sutures, nevertheless sutures represent the significantly stronger and cheaper fixation method.

Development of a Novel X-ray Compatible 3D-Printed Bone Model to Characterize Different K-Wire Fixation Methods in Support of the Treatment of Pediatric Radius Fractures

Additive manufacturing technologies are essential in biomedical modeling and prototyping. Polymer-based bone models are widely used in simulating surgical interventions and procedures. Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures, in which the Kirschner wire fixation is the most widely used operative method. However, there is still lingering controversy throughout the published literature regarding the number of wires and sites of insertion. This study aims to critically compare the biomechanical stability of different K-wire fixation techniques. Different osteosyntheses were reconstructed on 189 novel standardized bone models, which were created using 3D printing and molding techniques, using PLA and polyurethane materials, and it has been characterized in terms of mechanical behavior and structure. X-ray imaging has also been performed. The validation of the model was successful: the relative standard deviations (RSD = 100 × SD × mean−1, where RSD is relative standard deviation, SD is the standard deviation) of the mechanical parameters varied between 1.1% (10° torsion; 6.52 Nm ± 0.07 Nm) and 5.3% (5° torsion; 4.33 Nm ± 0.23 Nm). The simulated fractures were fixed using two K-wires inserted from radial and dorsal directions (crossed wire fixation) or both from the radial direction, in parallel (parallel wire fixation). Single-wire fixations with shifted exit points were also included. Additionally, three-point bending tests with dorsal and radial load and torsion tests were performed. We measured the maximum force required for a 5 mm displacement of the probe under dorsal and radial loads (means for crossed wire fixation: 249.5 N and 355.9 N; parallel wire fixation: 246.4 N and 308.3 N; single wire fixation: 115.9 N and 166.5 N). We also measured the torque required for 5° and 10° torsion (which varied between 0.15 Nm for 5° and 0.36 Nm for 10° torsion). The crossed wire fixation provided the most stability during the three-point bending tests. Against torsion, both the crossed and parallel wire fixation were superior to the single-wire fixations. The 3D printed model is found to be a reliable, cost-effective tool that can be used to characterize the different fixation methods, and it can be used in further pre-clinical investigations.

Biomechanical properties of a novel fixation system for intra-articular distal humerus fractures: a finite element analysis

Background The traditional strategy for fixing intra-articular distal humerus fractures is double plating placed in an orthogonal configuration, based on posterior approach. With a combined medial and lateral approach, a novel configuration of plating (combined anteromedial and anterolateral plating) has been used. In this study, we investigated the biomechanical properties of the novel plating by comparing it with some traditional strategies. Methods Based on the 3D morphology of a healthy subject’s humerus, models of three types of intra-articular distal humeral fractures were established using a variety of different internal fixation methods: (a) treatment of a simple intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus with the novel double plate and a traditional orthogonal plate; (b) treatment of a comminuted fracture of the lower distal humerus with the novel double plate, a traditional orthogonal plate and a traditional orthogonal plate combined with distally extended tension screws; (c) treatment of a coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus with the novel double plate, a traditional orthogonal plate and the intra-articular placement of three screws. The material properties of all plates and screws were isotropic and linearly elastic. The Poisson ratio of the implant and bone was 0.3, and the elastic modulus of the implant was 114,000 MPa. The axial loading is 200 N, the bending loading is 30 N and varus rotation is 7.5 Nm in the longitudinal direction. Results A simple model of intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus (AO C1 type) was established. Under all experimental conditions, the novel double plate showed greater stiffness than the orthogonal double plate. The axial straightening, bending compression and varus torsion increased by 18.00%, 16.00% and 44.00%, respectively. In the model of comminuted fracture of the lower distal humerus, the novel double plate showed the best stiffness under three experimental conditions (163.93 N/mm, 37.97 N/mm, 2697.84 N mm/°), and the stiffness of the traditional orthogonal plate combined with the distally extended tension screws was similar to that of the traditional orthogonal plate (121.21 N/mm, 32.61 N/mm, 1968.50 N mm/°). In the model of coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus, the novel double plate showed the best stiffness under all test conditions (194.17 N/mm, 38.46 N/mm, 2929.69 N mm/°), followed by the traditional plate (153.85 N/mm, 33.33 N/mm, 2650.18 N mm/°), while the stiffness of the three screws was the smallest (115.61 N/mm, 28.30 N/mm, 2180.23 N mm/°). Conclusions In terms of biomechanics, compared with other internal fixation methods, the novel combined anteromedial and anterolateral anatomical locking double-plate showed less stress, less displacement and greater stiffness. The novel double-plate method can be used to treat not only simple intra-articular fractures of the humerus but also complex comminuted fractures of the lower distal humerus and coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, with a better effect than current traditional internal fixation methods.

A Locking Plate Designed With Cluster of Head Screws Would Be Biomechanically Superior Than Conventional Buttress Plate For The Fixation of Posteromedial Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Computational Assessment

Background: Dealing with high-energy fractures of the tibial plateau remains a challenge despite advances in implants, surgical approaches, and imaging methods. Posterior buttress plate is most commonly used implant but the fixation stability is still a challenge. Recently, a newly designed tibial locking plate was introduced that aims to provide better fixation strength for tibial plateau split fracture. This study compared the biomechanical strength of three different posteromedial tibial plateau split fracture fixation methods. Methods: The tibial plateau fractures were simulated using a human tibiae model. Each fracture model was virtually implanted with one of the three following constructs, proximal medial tibial plate (PMT), proximal posterior medial tibial plate (PPMT), and posterior T-shaped buttress plate (TBP). Posteromedial fragment vertical subsidence was measured under 2000 N joint contact force. The maximum Equivalent stress on the bone plate and bone screw and the construct stiffness were determined.Results: The proximal medial tibial plate (PMT) allowed the least posteromedial fragment subsidence and produced higher construct stiffness than each of the other two constructs. However, the proximal posterior medial tibial plate (PPMT) showed higher stiffness than the T-shaped buttress plate (TBP). The maximum Equivalent stress was the smallest for the proximal medial tibial plate (PMT).Conclusion: This study showed that the proximal medial tibial locking plate or proximal posterior medial tibial locking plate were biomechanically more stable fixation methods for posteromedial split tibial plateau fractures.