scholarly journals Erratum to: Who has Housing Affordability Problems? Disparities in Housing Cost Burden by Race, Nativity and Legal Status in Los Angeles

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Diaz McConnell
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tabashir Z. Nobari ◽  
Shannon E. Whaley ◽  
Evelyn Blumenberg ◽  
Michael L. Prelip ◽  
May C. Wang

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Bo Kyong Seo ◽  
Gum-Ryeong Park

Abstract Objective: Given the competing needs for food and housing under the limited household income among poor families, there is lack of research on the associations between housing affordability and food insecurity. This study examines how housing cost burden affects food insecurity of low-income families and whether decreased housing cost enhance food security. Design: Longitudinal data from the Korean Welfare Panel Study, of which the final sample for the analysis consisted of 31,304 household-level observations from 5,466 households based on 12 waves (2007-2018) Setting: South Korea Participants: Low-income households in the lowest 40% of household income distribution Results: 19.3% had food insecurity, and housing cost burden was associated with food insecurity. While in-kind housing assistance and in-cash assistance from all sources were likely to reduce food insecurity partially through influencing housing cost burden, in-cash housing assistance was associated with higher likelihood of food insecurity. Conclusions: Housing cost burden potentially limits food access among poor families, and housing assistance, particularly public housing and sufficient in-cash assistance, are conducive to alleviating food insecurity.


Author(s):  
Wilfried Altzinger ◽  
Emanuel List

This article presents an empirical analysis of the housing costs of Austrian households and the resulting financial burden for homeowners and renters. On average homeowners have significantly higher incomes than households that rent their main residence. In addition, the housing costs for homeowners are also lower in absolute terms, even if a current loan is still being paid off. Thus, the relative housing cost burden as a share of disposable income is much lower for homeowners than for renters. Consequently, the inclusion of housing costs leads to an increased inequality of disposable income (after deducting housing costs). The data also show that subsidized tenants have a comparatively lower housing cost burden than non-subsidized tenants. This finding is also confirmed by econometric exercises, which further show that housing costs represent an above-average burden for young households, singles and especially single parents. Housing policy measures designed to reduce the burden of the households most affected by high housing costs should therefore primarily focus on supporting renters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document