scholarly journals Familiarity and Complexity during a Takeover in Highly Automated Driving

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Susanne Lisa Scharfe-Scherf ◽  
Nele Russwinkel
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Modeling ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Cognitive State ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Cognitive Assistance ◽  
Assistance Systems ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Subjective Complexity ◽  
Highly Automated Driving ◽  
Action Decision

AbstractThis paper shows, how objective complexity and familiarity impact the subjective complexity and the time to make an action decision during the takeover task in a highly automated driving scenario. In the next generation of highly automated driving the driver remains as fallback and has to take over the driving task whenever the system reaches a limit. It is thus highly important to develop an assistance system that supports the individual driver based on information about the drivers’ current cognitive state. The impact of familiarity and complexity (objective and subjective) on the time to make an action decision during a takeover is investigated. To produce replicable driving scenarios and manipulate the independent variables situation familiarity and objective complexity, a driving simulator is used. Results show that the familiarity with a traffic situation as well as the objective complexity of the environment significantly influence the subjective complexity and the time to make an action decision. Furthermore, it is shown that the subjective complexity is a mediator variable between objective complexity/familiarity and the time to make an action decision. Complexity and familiarity are thus important parameters that have to be considered in the development of highly automated driving systems. Based on the presented mediation effect, the opportunity of gathering the drivers’ subjective complexity and adapting cognitive assistance systems accordingly is opened up. The results of this study provide a solid basis that enables an individualization of the takeover by implementing useful cognitive modeling to individualize cognitive assistance systems for highly automated driving.

scholarly journals The Impact of Situational Complexity and Familiarity on Takeover Quality in Uncritical Highly Automated Driving Scenarios

Information ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Susanne Lisa Scharfe ◽  
Kathrin Zeeb ◽  
Nele Russwinkel
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Intelligent Vehicles ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Strong Focus ◽  
Cognitive Assistance ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Perceived Complexity ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

In the development of highly automated driving systems (L3 and 4), much research has been done on the subject of driver takeover. Strong focus has been placed on the takeover quality. Previous research has shown that one of the main influencing factors is the complexity of a traffic situation that has not been sufficiently addressed so far, as different approaches towards complexity exist. This paper differentiates between the objective complexity and the subjectively perceived complexity. In addition, the familiarity with a takeover situation is examined. Gold et al. show that repetition of takeover scenarios strongly influences the take-over performance. Yet, both complexity and familiarity have not been considered at the same time. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the impact of objective complexity and familiarity on the subjectively perceived complexity and the resulting takeover quality. In a driving simulator study, participants are requested to take over vehicle control in an uncritical situation. Familiarity and objective complexity are varied by the number of surrounding vehicles and scenario repetitions. Subjective complexity is measured using the NASA-TLX; the takeover quality is gathered using the take-over controllability rating (TOC-Rating). The statistical evaluation results show that the parameters significantly influence the takeover quality. This is an important finding for the design of cognitive assistance systems for future highly automated and intelligent vehicles.

scholarly journals How the Initial Level of Trust in Automated Driving Impacts Drivers’ Behaviour and Early Trust Construction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Manchon ◽  
Mercedes Bueno ◽  
Jordan Navarro
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Initial Level ◽  
Environment Monitoring ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
The Road ◽  
Trust In Automation ◽  
Gaze Behaviour ◽  
Simulator Study ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

Trust in Automation is known to influence human-automation interaction and user behaviour. In the Automated Driving (AD) context, studies showed the impact of drivers’ Trust in Automated Driving (TiAD), and linked it with, e.g., difference in environment monitoring or driver’s behaviour. This study investigated the influence of driver’s initial level of TiAD on driver’s behaviour and early trust construction during Highly Automated Driving (HAD). Forty drivers participated in a driving simulator study. Based on a trust questionnaire, participants were divided in two groups according to their initial level of TiAD: high (Trustful) vs. low (Distrustful). Declared level of trust, gaze behaviour and Non-Driving-Related Activities (NDRA) engagement were compared between the two groups over time. Results showed that Trustful drivers engaged more in NDRA and spent less time monitoring the road compared to Distrustful drivers. However, an increase in trust was observed in both groups. These results suggest that initial level of TiAD impact drivers’ behaviour and further trust evolution.

scholarly journals Information Needs and Visual Attention during Urban, Highly Automated Driving—An Investigation of Potential Influencing Factors

Information ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Feierle ◽  
Simon Danner ◽  
Sarah Steininger ◽  
Klaus Bengler
Keyword(s):  
Visual Attention ◽  
Information Needs ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Automation System ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Navigation Data ◽  
Levels Of Automation ◽  
Machine Interface ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

During highly automated driving, the passenger is allowed to conduct non-driving related activities (NDRA) and no longer has to act as a fallback at the functional limits of the driving automation system. Previous research has shown that at lower levels of automation, passengers still wish to be informed about automated vehicle behavior to a certain extent. Due to the aim of the introduction of urban automated driving, which is characterized by high complexity, we investigated the information needs and visual attention of the passenger during urban, highly automated driving. Additionally, there was an investigation into the influence of the experience of automated driving and of NDRAs on these results. Forty participants took part in a driving simulator study. As well as the information presented on the human–machine interface (system status, navigation information, speed and speed limit), participants requested information about maneuvers, reasons for maneuvers, environmental settings and additional navigation data. Visual attention was significantly affected by the NDRA, while the experience of automated driving had no effect. Experience and NDRA showed no significant effect on the need for information. Differences in information needs seem to be due to the requirements of the individual passenger, rather than the investigated factors.

Comfort Assessment for Highly Automated Driving Functions at the Stuttgart Driving Simulator

2021 ◽  
pp. 368-379
Author(s):  
Christoph Heimsath ◽  
Werner Krantz ◽  
Jens Neubeck ◽  
Christian Holzapfel ◽  
Andreas Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

scholarly journals Does a Confidence Level for Automated Driving Time Estimations Improve the Subjective Evaluation of an Automation HMI?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Tobias Hecht ◽  
Simon Danner ◽  
Alexander Feierle ◽  
Klaus Bengler
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Mixed Design ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Traffic Conditions ◽  
Driving Time ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Machine Interface ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The City

Current research in human factors and automated driving is increasingly focusing on predictable transitions instead of urgent and critical take-overs. Predictive human–machine interface (HMI) elements displaying the remaining time until the next request to intervene were identified as a user need, especially when the user is engaging in non-driving related activities (NDRA). However, these estimations are prone to errors due to changing traffic conditions and updated map-based information. Thus, we investigated a confidence display for Level 3 automated driving time estimations. Based on a preliminary study, a confidence display resembling a mobile phone connectivity symbol was developed. In a mixed-design driving simulator study with 32 participants, we assessed the impact of the confidence display concept (within factor) on usability, frustration, trust and acceptance during city and highway automated driving (between factor). During automated driving sections, participants engaged in a naturalistic visual NDRA to create a realistic scenario. Significant effects were found for the scenario: participants in the city experienced higher levels of frustration. However, the confidence display has no significant impact on the subjective evaluation and most participants preferred the baseline HMI without a confidence symbol.

Trust in Automation as a Matter of Media Influence and Experi-ence of Automated Vehicles

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 2024-2028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Feldhütter ◽  
Christian Gold ◽  
Adrian Hüger ◽  
Klaus Bengler
Keyword(s):  
Road Safety ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Intention To Use ◽  
Automated Vehicles ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Trust In Automation ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Media ◽  
Source Of Information ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

Highly automated vehicles (HAV), which could help to enhance road safety and efficiency, are very likely to enter the market within the next decades. To have an impact, these systems need to be purchased, which is a matter of trust and acceptance. These factors are dependent on the level of information that one has about such systems. One important source of information is various media, such as newspapers, magazines and videos, in which highly automated driving (HAD) is currently a frequent topic of discussion. To evaluate the influence of media on the perception of HAD, 31 participants were presented with three different types of media addressing HAD in a neutral manner. Afterwards, the participants experienced HAD in the driving simulator. In between these steps, the participants completed questionnaires assessing comfort, trust in automation, increase in safety, intention to use and other factors in order to analyze the effect of the media and the driving simulation experience. Results indicate that the perception of some aspects of HAD were affected by the media presented, while experiencing HAD in the driving simulator generally did not have an effect on the attitude of the participants. Other aspects, such as trust, were not affected by either media or experience. In addition, gender-related differences in the perception of HAD were found.

Function-Specific Uncertainty Communication in Automated Driving

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-97
Author(s):  
Alexander Kunze ◽  
Stephen J. Summerskill ◽  
Russell Marshall ◽  
Ashleigh J. Filtness
Keyword(s):  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Situation Awareness ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Driving Experience ◽  
Visual Variables ◽  
Simulator Study ◽  
The Impact

Conveying the overall uncertainties of automated driving systems was shown to improve trust calibration and situation awareness, resulting in safer takeovers. However, the impact of presenting the uncertainties of multiple system functions has yet to be investigated. Further, existing research lacks recommendations for visualizing uncertainties in a driving context. The first study outlined in this publication investigated the implications of conveying function-specific uncertainties. The results of the driving simulator study indicate that the effects on takeover performance depends on driving experience, with less experienced drivers benefitting most. Interview responses revealed that workload increments are a major inhibitor of these benefits. Based on these findings, the second study explored the suitability of 11 visual variables for an augmented reality-based uncertainty display. The results show that particularly hue and animation-based variables are appropriate for conveying uncertainty changes. The findings inform the design of all displays that show content varying in urgency.

Function-Specific Uncertainty Communication in Automated Driving

2022 ◽  
pp. 1002-1026
Author(s):  
Alexander Kunze ◽  
Stephen J. Summerskill ◽  
Russell Marshall ◽  
Ashleigh J. Filtness
Keyword(s):  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Situation Awareness ◽  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Driving Experience ◽  
Visual Variables ◽  
Simulator Study ◽  
The Impact

Conveying the overall uncertainties of automated driving systems was shown to improve trust calibration and situation awareness, resulting in safer takeovers. However, the impact of presenting the uncertainties of multiple system functions has yet to be investigated. Further, existing research lacks recommendations for visualizing uncertainties in a driving context. The first study outlined in this publication investigated the implications of conveying function-specific uncertainties. The results of the driving simulator study indicate that the effects on takeover performance depends on driving experience, with less experienced drivers benefitting most. Interview responses revealed that workload increments are a major inhibitor of these benefits. Based on these findings, the second study explored the suitability of 11 visual variables for an augmented reality-based uncertainty display. The results show that particularly hue and animation-based variables are appropriate for conveying uncertainty changes. The findings inform the design of all displays that show content varying in urgency.

scholarly journals Does Adaptive Mode Transition Contribute to Better Driver Intervention in Highly Automated Driving?

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-291
Author(s):  
Huiping Zhou ◽  
Makoto Itoh ◽  
Satoshi Kitazaki
Keyword(s):  
Driving Simulator ◽  
Mode Transition ◽  
Automated Driving ◽  
Automated Control ◽  
Human Driver ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level Transition ◽  
Verbal Messages ◽  
Level 2 ◽  
Highly Automated Driving

This paper presents an adaptive mode (level) transition in highly combined driving automation in which the mode of a system could adaptively shift to any level including SAE level 3 (conditional automation, CA) to level 2 (partial automation) based on the driving environment. We show the effects of the adaptive transition on the take over of car control by a human driver and driving behavior after intervention when the system issues a response to intervene. A driving simulator experiment is conducted to collect data during the transition from automated control to manual driving in three scenes: obstacle on a driving lane, blurred lane mark, and stopped car ahead. Results indicate that the interventions of drivers who experience the adaptive transition are delayed in comparison to those who experience only the fixed transition. The adaptive transition is conducive for drivers to stop the car for preventing a potential collision with a stopped car ahead. Owing to the adaptive transition, drivers perceive a critical hazard after taking over car control and provide a rapid response. In addition, during the adaptive transition, drivers prefer verbal messages to the simple “beeping” message.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document