scholarly journals COVID-19: Before the Fall, An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Treatment Options

Author(s):  
Nicholas Rebold ◽  
Dana Holger ◽  
Sara Alosaimy ◽  
Taylor Morrisette ◽  
Michael Rybak
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elio Clemente Agostoni ◽  
◽  
Piero Barbanti ◽  
Paolo Calabresi ◽  
Bruno Colombo ◽  
...  

Respirology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianhan Shang ◽  
David Chien Lye ◽  
Bin Cao

Author(s):  
Jan Schmidt ◽  
Martina Kunderova ◽  
Nela Pilbauerova ◽  
Martin Kapitan

This work provides a narrative review covering evidence-based recommendations for pericoronitis management (Part A) and a systematic review of antibiotic prescribing for pericoronitis from January 2000 to May 2021 (Part B). Part A presents the most recent, clinically significant, and evidence-based guidance for pericoronitis diagnosis and proper treatment recommending the local therapy over antibiotic prescribing, which should be reserved for severe conditions. The systematic review includes publications analyzing sets of patients treated for pericoronitis and questionnaires that identified dentists' therapeutic approaches to pericoronitis. Questionnaires among dentists revealed that almost 75% of them prescribed antibiotics for pericoronitis, and pericoronitis was among the top 4 in the frequency of antibiotic use within the surveyed diagnoses and situations. Studies involving patients showed that antibiotics were prescribed to more than half of the patients with pericoronitis, and pericoronitis was among the top 2 in the frequency of antibiotic use within the monitored diagnoses and situations. The most prescribed antibiotics for pericoronitis were amoxicillin and metronidazole. The systematic review results show abundant and unnecessary use of antibiotics for pericoronitis and are in strong contrast to evidence-based recommendations summarized in the narrative review. Adherence of dental professionals to the recommendations presented in this work can help rapidly reduce the duration of pericoronitis, prevent its complications, and reduce the use of antibiotics and thus reduce its impact on patients' quality of life, healthcare costs, and antimicrobial resistance development.


Author(s):  
Jay Karri ◽  
Laura Lachman ◽  
Alex Hanania ◽  
Anuj Marathe ◽  
Mani Singh ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 38030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deivendran Kalirathinam ◽  
Raj Guruchandran ◽  
Prabhakar Subramani

The 2019 novel coronavirus officially named as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic by the World Health Organization, has spread to more than 180 countries. The ongoing global pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus, which causes COVID-19, spread to the United Kingdom (UK) in January 2020. Transmission within the UK was confirmed in February, leading to an epidemic with a rapid increase in cases in March. As on April 25- 2020, there have been 148,377 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the UK and 20,319 people with confirmed infection have died. Survival of critically ill patients is frequently associated with significant functional impairment and reduced health-related quality of life. Early physiotherapy and community rehabilitation of COVID-19 patients has recently been identified as an essential therapeutic tool and has become a crucial evidence-based component in the management of these patients. This comprehensive narrative review aims to describe recent progress in the application of physiotherapy management in COVID 19 patients. Assessment and evidence- based treatment of these patients should include prevention, reduction of adverse consequences in immobilization, and long-term impairment sequelae. A variety of techniques and modalities of early physiotherapy in intensive care unit are suggested by clinical research. They should be applied according to the stage of the disease, comorbidities, and patient’s level of cooperation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 030006052110532
Author(s):  
Zhe Feng ◽  
Ting Wang ◽  
Sheng Dong ◽  
Hongli Jiang ◽  
Jianzhong Zhang ◽  
...  

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a serious non-communicable disease that poses a significant burden on healthcare and society. It is essential to devise new strategies to better treat patients with CKD. Research has illustrated that gut dysbiosis, describing an abnormal intestinal ecology, is closely associated with CKD. In this narrative review, we summarized the evidence of their mutual relationship and discussed the potential treatment options to correct gut dysbiosis in patients with CKD. Gut dysbiosis significantly increases the risk of CKD, especially in the older population. Gut dysbiosis also plays a role in CKD complications, such as hypertension, cardiovascular events, and cognitive dysfunction. The relationship between gut dysbiosis and CKD is bidirectional, and CKD itself can lead to changes in gut microecology. The usual therapies for CKD can also increase the incidence of gut dysbiosis. Meanwhile, probiotics and antibiotics are generally used to correct gut dysbiosis. Further studies are required to elaborate the association between gut dysbiosis and CKD, and more treatment options should be explored to prevent CKD in patients with gut dysbiosis.


Author(s):  
M. A. Aljabali ◽  
L. V. Kuts

In the era of evidence-based medicine, confirming a disease by using various instrumental methods is one of the important tasks. This enables to reduce the number of diagnostic errors and to prescribe the appropriate treatment in accordance with the current views on the problem of alopecia areata in each case. Moreover, monitoring the course of the disease, data recording and their statistical processing opens up the prospect for obtaining evidence-based treatment methods. Studying the effectiveness of various treatment options and approaches including the registration of results obtained and their statistical processing is of great clinical significance. The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of monotherapy with betamethasone injections, with platelet-rich plasma, and their combination. The venous blood of 104 patients aged (35.7 ± 8.9 years with alopecia areata was used in the study. All patients were randomly divided to three groups. The group І received intradermal injections of betamethasone (4 sessions per month). The group ІІ received intradermal injections of platelet-rich plasma once every 2 weeks for 16 weeks. The group ІІІ received 4 sessions of betamethasone which were alternated with 4 sessions of platelet-rich plasma treatment at interval of 2 weeks. The patients were examined before the treatment and in 3, 6 and 17 months. The following factors as the age, sex, smoking habit, the presence of alopecia in relatives, the duration, shape and stage of the disease, the index of the severity of alopecia and hair growth, the presence of "yellow and black dots", "conical" and terminal hair were considered in the study. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22.0.). The results have shown the combination therapy allows us to obtain the best result, especially in long follow-up period.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document