scholarly journals COVID-19 Inpatient Mortality Disparities Among American Indian Adults in Mississippi’s Safety Net Hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie A. Musshafen ◽  
Richard L. Summers ◽  
Seth T. Lirette ◽  
Caroline Compretta ◽  
Thomas E. Dobbs
Keyword(s):  
American Indian ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
Mortality Disparities

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Victoria L. Phillips ◽  
Anil K. Roy ◽  
Jonathan Ratcliff ◽  
Gustavo Pradilla
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Inpatient Mortality ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Discharge Status

Objective. We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. Patients. The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a comparison group of 23 patients who were medically managed from June 2012 to December 2013. All had an International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis of 431 and were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, public, safety-net hospital. Methods. The primary endpoint was risk of inpatient mortality. Secondary endpoints were rates of inpatient infection and favorable discharge status, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation facility. Demographics and pre- and postclinical outcomes were compared using t-tests, the Mann–Whitney test, and chi-squared tests for continuous, ordinal and categorical measures, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the time to inpatient death. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine treatment effects on secondary outcomes. We also conducted exploratory subgroup analyses which compared MIPS to two medical management subgroups: those who had surgery during their hospitalization and those that did not. Results. Two patients (12%) died in the MIPS group compared to three (12%) in the medical management group. MIPS did not increase the risk of inpatient mortality relative to medical management. Rates of inpatient infection did not differ significantly between the two groups; eight MIPS patients (47%) and 13 medically managed patients (50%) contracted infections. MIPS significantly increased the likelihood of favorable discharge status (odds ratio (OR) 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12–21.9) compared to medical management. No outcome measures were significantly different between MIPS and the medical management subgroup without surgery, while rates of favorable discharge were higher among the MIPS patients compared to the medical management group with surgery. Conclusions. These data suggest that MIPS, as a frontline treatment for spontaneous ICH, versus medical management for spontaneous ICH warrants further investigation.

1195-P: Improving Diabetes Self-Management with a Mobile App: Results of a Pilot Program at a Safety Net Hospital System

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1195-P
Author(s):  
ROOPA KALYANARAMAN MARCELLO ◽  
JOHANNA DOLLE ◽  
SHARANJIT KAUR ◽  
SAWKIA R. PATTERSON ◽  
NICHOLA DAVIS
Keyword(s):  
Safety Net ◽  
Mobile App ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Pilot Program ◽  
Hospital System ◽  
Safety Net Hospital

scholarly journals COVID-19 Pandemic and the Cholecystitis Experience at a Major Urban Safety-Net Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
Katherine F Vallès ◽  
Miriam Y Neufeld ◽  
Elisa Caron ◽  
Sabrina E Sanchez ◽  
Tejal S Brahmbhatt
Keyword(s):  
Safety Net ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
Urban Safety

Patient Capability, Confidence, and Interest in Telemedicine at a Public Safety Net Hospital Urology Clinic

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 1047-1058
Author(s):  
Andin Josipovic ◽  
Jeffrey Reese ◽  
Erin C. Cantarero ◽  
Christopher S. Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Public Safety ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
Urology Clinic

scholarly journals Impact of insurance status on overall survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC)

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi J. Chokshi ◽  
Jin K. Kim ◽  
Jimmy Patel ◽  
Joseph B. Oliver ◽  
Omar Mahmoud
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Gynecologic Malignancies ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
The Impact

AbstractObjectivesThe impact of insurance status on oncological outcome in patients undergoing cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is poorly understood.MethodsRetrospective study on 31 patients having undergone 36 CRS-HIPEC at a single institution (safety-net hospital) between 2012 and 2018. Patients were categorized as insured or underinsured. Demographics and perioperative events were compared. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 20 patients were underinsured and 11 were insured. There were less gynecologic malignancies in the underinsured (p=0.02). On univariate analysis, factors linked to poor survival included gastrointestinal (p=0.01) and gynecologic malignancies (p=0.046), treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.03), CC1 (p=0.02), abdominal wall resection (p=0.01) and Clavien–Dindo 3-4 (p=0.01). Treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and abdominal wall resections, but not insurance status, were independently associated with OS (p=0.01, p=0.02 respectively). However, at the end of follow-up, six patients were alive in the insured group vs. zero in the underinsured group.ConclusionsIn this small, exploratory study, there was no statistical difference in OS between insured and underinsured patients after CRS-HIPEC. However, long-term survivors were observed only in the insured group.

Evaluation of Patterns in Access to Breast Cancer Care and Breast Cancer Presentation in a Safety Net Patient Population

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482096628
Author(s):  
Erica Choe ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Ma’at Hembrick ◽  
Christine Dauphine ◽  
Junko Ozao-Choy
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Minority Women ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
Screening Mammograms

Background While prior studies have shown the apparent health disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, there is a gap in knowledge with respect to access to breast cancer care among minority women. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2014 to 2016 to evaluate how patients presented and accessed cancer care services in our urban safety net hospital. Patient demographics, cancer stage, history of breast cancer screening, and process of referral to cancer care were collected and analyzed. Results Of the 202 patients identified, 61 (30%) patients were younger than the age of 50 and 75 (63%) were of racial minority background. Only 39% of patients with a new breast cancer were diagnosed on screening mammogram. Women younger than the age of 50 ( P < .001) and minority women ( P < .001) were significantly less likely to have had any prior screening mammograms. Furthermore, in patients who met the screening guideline age, more than half did not have prior screening mammograms. Discussion Future research should explore how to improve breast cancer screening rates within our county patient population and the potential need for revision of screening guidelines for minority patients.

Disparities in communication among the inpatient homeless population at a safety-net hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Vellozzi-Averhoff ◽  
William W. Thompson ◽  
Claudia Vellozzi ◽  
Ike Okosun ◽  
Kathy Kinlaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Net ◽  
Homeless Population ◽  
Safety Net Hospital
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document