Interference of actinomycin D with the replication of the herpes virus DNA. I. Difference in behaviour of cellular and viral nucleic acid synthesis following treatment with actinomycin D

Author(s):  
Gerhard Sauer ◽  
Hans Dieter Orth ◽  
Klaus Munk
Science ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 134 (3478) ◽  
pp. 556-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Reich ◽  
R. M. Franklin ◽  
A. J. Shatkin ◽  
E. L. Tatum

1979 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 345-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rice ◽  
L. Holland ◽  
E. K. Wagner

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 967 ◽  
Author(s):  
JD Watson ◽  
REF Matthews

Actinomycin D and 2-thiouracil inhibit floral initiation in C. amaranticolor when applied to plants before the end of the inductive dark period. Actinomycin D does not suppress floral differentiation if it is applied to plants more than 48 hr after the inductive dark cycle, whereas 2-thiouracil retains its ability to interfere with floral differentiation when applied to plants several days after the inductive dark period.


The production of interferon by animal viruses is a response to the viral nucleic acid. At high multiplicity of infection the nucleic acid of the infecting virus is an adequate stimulus, while at lower multiplicities, viral nucleic acid synthesis is necessary for subsequent interferon formation. It is not known why viral nucleic acids are such effective interferon inducers, nor is it known how their presence within the cell leads to the formation of interferon. It is most likely that the presence of the viral nucleic acids within the cytoplasm leads to a change in the nucleus, resulting in the transcription and translation of the appropriate gene for interferon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document