scholarly journals Corporate income tax competition, double taxation treaties, and foreign direct investment

1995 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eckhard Janeba
2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Amalia Indah Sujarwati ◽  
Riatu Mariatul Qibthiyyah

This study aims to explore the impact of Corporate Income Tax Rate (CITR) on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), specified based on income levels of countries. Using an unbalanced fixed-effect method of 112 countries over the period of 2003–2017, our finding shows that CITR has no significant impact on FDI. Corporate Income Tax (CIT) is levied on all firms, and as CIT is generally more complex than other types of taxes, its influences on FDI are in question. Excluding tax havens from the sample, our findings show that CITR has a weak significance only in the lower-middle-income and low-income countries.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Mercer-Blackman ◽  
Shiela Camingue-Romance

Using panel data at the country and sector level spanning almost 15 years, this paper shows that the corporate income tax rate does not affect the United States’ inward foreign direct investment once market size, costs, openness, and the business environment, are taken into account. This is true for United States foreign direct investment bound to developing Asia and across most sectors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 66
Author(s):  
Rotua Andriyati Siregar ◽  
Arianto Patunru

Using the data from twenty-two partner countries in 1999 to 2018, this paper presents the impact of tax incentives on foreign direct investment (FDI) in Indonesia. A fixed-effect and least square dummy variable analysis are used to determine the direction and significance of tax incentives in its correlation with FDI together with other FDI determinant. The main finding shows that as tax incentives increase, the FDI flow decrease significantly. However, corporate income tax (CIT) rate which also used as investment cost proxy shows that as it decreases the FDI flow will increase.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aitor Navarro Ibarrola

Developing countries frequently grant corporate income tax incentives in order to attract foreign direct investment. To secure the effectiveness of these measures at a cross-border level, tax sparing clauses secure a notional credit at residence, meaning a discount on the taxes due even if no or lower taxes were paid at source. These clauses prevent the home country of the investor from taxing that income, allowing the investor to retain the tax spared by the host country. This contribution examines the rationale of tax sparing and conducts an examination of the issue from the perspective of the Latin-American tax treaty network – comprising more than 250 treaties – to draw relevant conclusions from the analysis of the specific clauses included in these agreements.


2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabien Candau ◽  
Jacques Le Cacheux

Author(s):  
Martin Surya Mulyadi ◽  
Maya Safira Dewi ◽  
Yunita Anwar ◽  
Hanggoro Pamungkas

Tax policy is one of the most important policy in consideration of investment development in certain industry. Research by Newlon (1987), Swenson (1994) and Hines (1996) concluded that tax rate is one of the most important thing considered by investors in a foreign direct investment. One of tax policy could be used to attract foreign direct investment is income tax incentives. The attractiveness of income tax incentives to a foreign direct investment is as much as the attractiveness to a domestic investment (Anwar and Mulyadi, 2012). In this paper, we have conducted a study of income tax incentives in food and agriculture industry; where we conduct a thorough study of income tax incentives and corporate performance in Indonesian and Australian food and agriculture industry. Our research show that there is a significant influence of income tax incentives to corporate performance. Based on our study, we conclude that the significant influence of income tax incentives to Indonesian corporate performance somewhat in a higher degree than the Australian peers. We have also concluded that Indonesian government provide a relatively more interesting income tax incentives compare to Australian government. However, an average method of net income –a method applied in Australia– could be considered by Indonesian government to avoid a market price fluctuation in this industry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (88) ◽  
pp. 217-232
Author(s):  
Miloš Vasović

The Serbian Corporate Income Tax Act contains a provision on the beneficial ownership of income (hereinafter: the BO provision), which is one of the conditions for the application of the preferential tax rate on income tax after tax deduction, which is envisaged in Treaties for the avoidance of Double Taxation on income and capital (hereinafter: Double Taxation Treaties/ DTTs). The subject matter of research in this paper is the term "beneficial ownership", which is not defined in the Corportate Income Tax Act. It may ultimately lead to abusing the preferential tax rates from the DTTs in tax planning and "treaty shopping" through the use of conduit companies. Tax experts have different opinions on the legal nature of the BO provision, which is given the function of an anti-abusive measure (on the one hand) and a rule for the attribution of income (on the other hand). The author analyzes the current function of the BO provision envisaged in the Serbian Serbian Corporate Income Tax Act (CITA), and its inadequate application. The author advocates for enacting the BO provision as an anti-abusive measure, and examines the possible application of the BO provision in domestic tax law, with reference to Articles 10, 11, and 12 of the DTTs that Serbia contracted with other states, as well as Articles 10-12 of the OECD Model-Convention on Income and Capital (2017) and Commentaries on these articles. Such an application of the BO provision may preclude "treaty shopping". In final remarks, the author points out why the BO provision should be envisaged as an anti-abusive measure in Serbian tax law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document