Participation of postsynaptic G-proteins in long-term potentiation of inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat visual cortex

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S165
Author(s):  
Yukio Komatsu
1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Komatsu ◽  
K. Fujii ◽  
J. Maeda ◽  
H. Sakaguchi ◽  
K. Toyama

1. Potentiation of synaptic transmission in visual cortex (areas 17 and 18) of kittens was investigated by extracellular recording of field potentials (FPs) and cortical units in cortical slices and whole-animal preparations. Responses to test stimulation (0.05 Hz) of the white matter (WM), lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), and optic chiasm (OC) were documented before and after conditioning stimulation (2 Hz for 1 h). 2. In slice preparations of area 17, the FPs were always depressed during conditioning stimulation and were usually potentiated immediately after conditioning stimulation. Long-term potentiation (LTP) of FPs developed rapidly during the initial 1–2 h and continued to increase slowly for several hours after conditioning. 3. LTP of FPs was age dependent: LTP occurred most frequently (43/53) at the ages of 21–34 days, less frequently (4/7 and 5/11) at 14–20 and 35–41 days, and never (0/5 and 0/5) at 7–13 and 42–49 days. LTP age relationship determined as a ratio of the amplitudes of FPs after conditioning to that before conditioning was greater at 21–34 days (mean potentiation, 2.4 +/- 0.6) than at 14–20 or 35–41 days (1.7 +/- 0.5). 4. LTP was also documented by the shortening in latencies of orthodromic responses of cortical units sampled from 10 pairs of conditioned and unconditioned control slices. Unit responses were classified into mono- and polysynaptic groups according to the central delay, defined as the time required for their activation after the arrival of afferent impulses. The monosynaptic central delays were 0.22 ms shorter in conditioned (0.60 +/- 0.17 ms, n = 56) than in control slices (0.82 +/- 0.22 ms, n = 57); similarly, polysynaptic central delays were 0.66 ms smaller (1.70 +/- 0.43 ms, n = 51; and 2.36 +/- 0.79 ms, n = 51). Both differences were statistically significant (P less than 0.001). 5. There were laminar differences in LTP of mono- and polysynaptic transmission. LTP of monosynaptic transmission occurred throughout layers II-V (central delays shortened about 0.2 ms), whereas LTP of polysynaptic transmission was greatest in layer II (1.17 ms), moderate in layer III (0.66 ms), and slight in layer IV (0.3 ms). The time course of shortening in orthodromic latency in five polysynaptic units agreed with the time course of LTP of FP. 6. Location of synapses involved in LTP of synaptic transmission was studied by current source-density (CSD) analysis in slice preparations of area 17 during test stimulation of WM. CSD analysis demonstrated two components of current sinks (early and late), probably representing mono- and polysynaptic transmission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


2000 ◽  
Vol 390 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Salami ◽  
Yaghoub Fathollahi ◽  
Hossein Esteky ◽  
Fereshteh Motamedi ◽  
Nafiseh Atapour

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Y. Komatsu ◽  
K. Fujii ◽  
J. Maeda ◽  
H. Sakaguchi ◽  
K. Toyama

Y. Komatsu, K. Fujii, J. Maeda, H. Sakaguchi, and K. Toyama, “Long-Term Potentiation of Synaptic Transmission in Kitten Visual Cortex.” Page 140: the fifth and sixth lines of the left-hand column should be deleted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document