Round window reinforcement for superior semicircular canal dehiscence: A retrospective multi-center case series

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Silverstein ◽  
Jack M. Kartush ◽  
Lorne S. Parnes ◽  
Dennis S. Poe ◽  
Seilesh C. Babu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 462-466
Author(s):  
Vivian Wung ◽  
Prasanth Romiyo ◽  
Edwin Ng ◽  
Courtney Duong ◽  
Thien Nguyen ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe authors compared postoperative symptoms between patients with sealed and those with plugged semicircular canal dehiscence repairs.METHODSIn total, 136 ears from 118 patients who underwent surgical repair for semicircular canal dehiscence were identified via chart review. Data from postoperative MRI scans showing preservation or loss of semicircular canal fluid signal and postoperative reports of autophony, amplification, aural fullness, tinnitus, hyperacusis, hearing loss, vertigo, dizziness, disequilibrium, oscillopsia, and headache were amalgamated and analyzed.RESULTSPatients with preservation of fluid signal were far less likely to have dizziness postoperatively (p = 0.007, OR 0.158, 95% CI 0.041–0.611). In addition, these patients were more likely to have tinnitus postoperatively (p = 0.028, OR 3.515, 95% CI 1.145–10.787).CONCLUSIONSThe authors found that superior semicircular canal dehiscence patients who undergo sealing without plugging have improved balance outcomes but show more tinnitus postoperatively than patients who undergo plugging.


2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 1268-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenya Linda Bi ◽  
Ryan Brewster ◽  
Dennis Poe ◽  
David Vernick ◽  
Daniel J. Lee ◽  
...  

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) syndrome is an increasingly recognized cause of vestibular and/or auditory symptoms in both adults and children. These symptoms are believed to result from the presence of a pathological mobile “third window” into the labyrinth due to deficiency in the osseous shell, leading to inadvertent hydroacoustic transmissions through the cochlea and labyrinth. The most common bony defect of the superior canal is found over the arcuate eminence, with rare cases involving the posteromedial limb of the superior canal associated with the superior petrosal sinus. Operative intervention is indicated for intractable or debilitating symptoms that persist despite conservative management and vestibular sedation. Surgical repair can be accomplished by reconstruction or plugging of the bony defect or reinforcement of the round window through a variety of operative approaches. The authors review the etiology, pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, surgical options, and outcomes in the treatment of this entity, with a focus on potential pitfalls that may be encountered during clinical management.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-13
Author(s):  
Scheherazade C. Ibrahim ◽  
Charlotte M. Chiong ◽  
Nathaniel W. Yang

Objective: This report aims to determine the clinical manifestations and management of patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SSCDS). Methods: Study Design: Case series. Setting: Tertiary hospitals and private clinics Participants: Out of 30 patients with vestibular vertigo or otologic symptom, 14 patients were diagnosed with SSCDS based on high resolution computed tomographic scan (HRCT).  The demographic features, incidence of specific signs and symptoms and management of these patients were described, including the audiograms, vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses and ancillary tests. Results: Vertigo was the most common vestibular symptom of SSCDS. Tullio phenomenon was elicited in 50% of patients with confirmed dehiscence on HRCT scan. Low frequency (250 Hz and 500 Hz) air-bone gap was noted in 21.4% of patients. Lowered VEMP responses were also noted in 66.7% of patients with confirmed SSCDS. Severity of symptoms may determine its management. Conclusion: The diagnosis of SSCDS does not conform to a specific clinical presentation or audiologic result thus good clinical correlation is needed in order to raise suspicion of the disease and prompt the clinician to order confirmatory imaging by computed tomographic scan or magnetic resonance imaging. The presence of this syndrome in a proportion of children that is greater than previously reported needs further study as these children may be genetically predisposed to have thinned out superior semicircular canals that eventually become dehisced albeit at an earlier age. Key words: Superior semicircular canal dehiscence, pure tone audiometry, vestibular evoked myogenic potential


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Mignacco ◽  
Lorenzo Salerni ◽  
Ilaria Bindi ◽  
Giovanni Monciatti ◽  
Alfonso Cerase ◽  
...  

The aim of the present study is to report the outcomes of round window reinforcement surgery performed with the application of a Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implant (VSB; MED-EL) in a patient with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) who presented with recurrent vertigo, Tullio phenomenon, Hennebert's sign, bone conduction hypersensitivity, and bilateral moderate to severe mixed hearing loss. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) confirmed bilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence while this was not seen in magnetic resonance imaging. The surgical procedure was performed in the right ear as it had worse vestibular and auditory symptoms, a poorer hearing threshold, and greatly altered HRCT and VEMPs findings. With local-assisted anesthesia, round window reinforcement surgery (plugging) with perichondrium was performed with simultaneous positioning of a VSB on the round window niche. At the one and 3 months follow-up after surgery, VSB-aided hearing threshold in the right ear improved to mild, and loud sounds did not elicit either dizziness or pain in the patient.


2019 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanth Romiyo ◽  
Courtney Duong ◽  
Edwin Ng ◽  
Vivian Wung ◽  
Methma Udawatta ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlito Lagman ◽  
Vera Ong ◽  
Lawrance K. Chung ◽  
Lekaa Elhajjmoussa ◽  
Christina Fong ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study is to present an illustrative case of pediatric superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) and to systematically review the current published literature in the pediatric population.METHODSAn electronic search of the Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed by 2 independent authors through January 2017. Search term combinations included “pediatrics,” “children,” “canal,” and “dehiscence.” Inclusion criteria were as follows: English, full-text clinical studies, case reports, and case series describing pediatric patient(s) (younger than 18 years) with CT evidence of SSCD. Baseline patient demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, dehiscence characteristics, management strategies, and outcome data were extracted.RESULTSA total of 14 studies involving 122 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis. The patients’ mean age was 7.22 years. Male predominance was observed (approximate male-to-female ratio of 1.65:1). Neurodevelopmental disorders were common (n = 14, 11.5%). Auditory signs and symptoms were more common than vestibular signs and symptoms. Hearing loss (n = 62, 50.8%) was the most common auditory symptom and an indicator for imaging evaluation. Vertigo was the most common vestibular symptom (n = 8, 6.6%). Hearing aids were recommended in 8 cases (6.6%), and surgical repair was performed in 1 case (0.8%). Symptom outcomes and follow-up durations were infrequently reported.CONCLUSIONSThe authors’ data suggest that in pediatric SSCD, males are more commonly affected than females. This is different than the adult population in which females are predominantly affected. A history of otologic and/or neurodevelopmental abnormalities was common. There was a preponderance of auditory symptoms in this age group. Conservative management was favored in the majority.


2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Chilvers ◽  
I McKay-Davies

AbstractObjective:This study aimed to review the current advances in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome and to ascertain its aetiology, whether dehiscence size correlates with symptoms, signs and investigation results, the best investigations, and its surgical management.Methods:A literature search using the key words ‘superior semicircular canal dehiscence’ was performed using the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database and the Embase, Health Management Information Consortium, Medline, PsycINFO, British Nursing Index, Cinahl and Health Business Elite databases for the period January 2009 to May 2014. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, prospective and retrospective case series, case reports, and observational studies were included.Results:Of the 205 papers identified, 35 were considered relevant.Conclusion:The aetiology of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome is unclear. Dehiscence size significantly affects the air–bone gap and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential thresholds. Computed tomography evaluation has a high false positive rate. The middle cranial fossa approach is the surgical standard for treating this syndrome; however, the transmastoid approach is gaining popularity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (7) ◽  
pp. 705-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Nikkar-Esfahani ◽  
D Whelan ◽  
A Banerjee

AbstractBackground:Conductive hyperacusis in superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome occurs due to the presence of a ‘third window’ created by the dehiscence. Reversible blocking of the round window can, in theory, cause a reduction in the compression-related volume displacement, and thereby minimise symptoms of conductive hyperacusis. This study describes a technique of permeatal blocking of the round window.Method:The tympanomeatal flap is elevated and the round window niche is identified. The round window membrane is subsequently identified and occluded with bone wax, muscle and fascia, in three separate layers. Finally, the tympanomeatal flap is reflected, and an ear wick is inserted.Results:Two patients who underwent the procedure reported a reduction in symptoms. Importantly, no Tullio phenomenon was reported post-operation.Conclusion:Blocking of the round window can be used to control symptoms of superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome in patients who present solely with symptoms of conductive hyperacusis. This technique provides an alternative to resurfacing techniques. The procedure is simple to perform, reversible and can be undertaken as day-case surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document