Impact of jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer on quality of life: short- and long-term consequences

2012 ◽  
Vol 204 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Namikawa ◽  
Toyokazu Oki ◽  
Hiroyuki Kitagawa ◽  
Takehiro Okabayashi ◽  
Michiya Kobayashi ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 1015-1019
Author(s):  
Tetsuro Kubota ◽  
Yoichiro Ishikawa ◽  
Soichiro Isshiki ◽  
Takeyoshi Yokoyama ◽  
Koji Fujita ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1568-1576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Yabusaki ◽  
Atsushi Nashimoto ◽  
Otsuo Tanaka ◽  
Yasumasa Takii ◽  
Yoshiaki Tsuchiya ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 294-297
Author(s):  
Marina Grinkevich ◽  
Viktor Klimenko ◽  
Aleksandr Shcherbakov ◽  
Oleg Tkachenko

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic resection of mucosa by dissection in submucosa in treatment for early gastric cancer. The study included 78 patients with early differentiated gastric cancer of stages T1aN0M0 (65) and T1bN0M0 (13) who underwent endoscopic resection of mucosa by dissection in the submucosal layer at the N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology. According to results of our study endoscopic resection of mucosa by dissection in the submucosal layer in early gastric cancer is highly effective (98.7%) and is a relatively safe method of organ-preserving radical treatment with a high quality of life in the long-term period, which allows it to be recommended as an option of choice for this pathology.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4054-4054
Author(s):  
Bang Wool Eom ◽  
Hong Man Yoon ◽  
Young-Woo Kim ◽  
Jae Seok Min ◽  
Ji Yeong An ◽  
...  

4054 Background: Laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) has been suggested as an alternative to laparoscopic standard gastrectomy (LSG) in early gastric cancer patients to improve long-term quality of life (QOL) and nutritional outcomes. Here, we present 3-year results of patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and nutrition, secondary endpoints of SENORITA trial. Methods: SENORITA is a prospective multicenter randomized phase 3 trial. Patients diagnosed with early gastric cancer of 3 cm or less were randomly allocated (1:1) to LSNNS for stomach preservation or LSG. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. In this study, we analyzed QOL assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC stomach module (STO22) and nutritional parameters at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery. Linear mixed model analyses was used to evaluate differences between the two groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01804998. Results: From March 2013 to March 2017, a total of 580 patients were randomly assigned and 527 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis population (258 in LSNNS and 269 in LSG group). QOL questionnaires were available for 99.4% of patients at baseline and then for 92.2%, 83.2%, 72.8%, and 66.9% at 3, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, respectively. The LSNNS group had higher physical function score than the LSG group at all time points (p = 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in other scales of EORTC QLQ-C30. Regarding EORTC QLQ-STO22, pain, eating restriction, anxiety, and taste scores were lower (better QOL) at all time points in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group (p = 0.002, < 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The summary score of EORTC QLQ-STO22 was also higher in the LSNNS group representing better QOL (p < 0.001). Body mass index, hemoglobin and total protein were significantly higher in the LSNNS group compared with the LSG group. Conclusions: The LSNNS group had better physical function and less symptoms, including pain, eating restriction, anxiety, and taste change compared with the LSG group. Moreover, the nutritional parameters were better maintained in the LSNNS group than in the LSG group. These findings showed benefits of stomach preserving surgery in LSNNS and can be used to help decision making about treatment for patients with early gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01804998.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Young-Il Kim ◽  
Young Ae Kim ◽  
Chan Gyoo Kim ◽  
Keun Won Ryu ◽  
Young Woo Kim ◽  
...  

24 Background: The aim of this study was to compare the serial changes of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with those after surgery in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods: Gastric cancer patients were prospectively enrolled from 2004 through 2007. HRQOLs of 161 EGC patients were prospectively assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and the stomach cancer-specific module EORTC-QLQ-STO22 at the baseline, 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after treatments. Analysis was done using the generalized linear model and paired- ttests. Results: Of 161 patients, 48 (29.8%) underwent ESD (ESD group) and 113 (70.2%) underwent surgery (surgery group). The median age of stomach cancer patients was 57 years. Surgery group had poorer scores compared with those of ESD group in the most HRQOL factors one month after treatments ( P< 0.05), except for emotional and cognitive functioning, financial problems, anxiety, and hair loss. However, most of the functional and symptom scales after surgery subsequently improved and became insignificant until 24 months of follow up. Only 3 parameters including physical functioning, diarrhea and body image in ESD group still remained better until 24 months after treatment ( P< 0.05). Conclusions: Because poorer HRQOLs after surgery in the early post-treatment periods become insignificant during long-term follow-up, surgical treatment should not be discouraged in EGC treatment solely based on the QOL aspects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document