The role of crowdsourced data, participatory decision-making and mapping of flood related events

2021 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 102393
Author(s):  
Barnali Dixon ◽  
RebeccaA. Johns ◽  
Amada Fernandez
2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 236-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Bess ◽  
Douglas D. Perkins ◽  
Daniel G. Cooper ◽  
Diana L. Jones

Author(s):  
Martha C. Monroe ◽  
Arjen E. J. Wals ◽  
Hiromi Kobori ◽  
Johanna Ekne

This chapter presents three cases that demonstrate a variety of interactions between residents and expert leaders in fostering sustainability innovations in cities. It looks at sustainable cities in Sweden, Japan, and the Netherlands, focusing on common principles that may help explain their success as well as the role of environmental education and learning in these efforts. All three examples engage municipal nonprofit and government agency leaders with residents in many different ways. Leaders and residents learn about sustainability as they build skills for participatory decision making. They offer ideas and realize that their contributions matter. The cases have outlived their inception phase and continue to grow and improve their outcomes despite setbacks, changing circumstances, and even opposition. The chapter explains how monitoring the outcomes of such innovations, including through citizen science and social learning, can contribute to their effectiveness.


Author(s):  
Bahrum Mustakim

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akuntabilitas kepemimpinan sekolah dalam proses pengambilan keputusan. Pengambilan keputusan berkaitan dengan tipe personalitas dan gaya kepemimpinan. Dalam lembaga pendidikan, pengambilan keputusan adalah bagian dari pengelolaan yang berorientasi pada perwujudan roda organisasi dan manajemen ekosistem pendidikan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan studi kepustakaan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan merekam literatur primer yang berkaitan dengan pengambilan keputusan secara partisipatif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa implementasi akuntabilitas didasarkan pada adanya otoritas kepemimpinan dan responsibilitas bawahan. Dalam hal ini, pengambilan keputusan secara partisipatif didasarkan pada peran pemimpin dan adanya persepsi dan aspirasi bawahan dalam pemecahan masalah, mencari alternatif, memformulasi dan memberikan informasi.   This study aims to analyze the accountability of school leadership in the decision-making process. Decision making is related to personality types and leadership styles. In educational institutions, decision making is part of management that is oriented to the realization of the wheels of the organization and management of the education ecosystem. The research uses a qualitative approach with a literature study. The study was conducted by recording primary literature relating to participatory decision making. The results of the study concluded that the implementation of accountability was based on the existence of leadership authority and responsibility of subordinates. In this case, participatory decision making is based on the role of the leader and the perception and aspirations of subordinates in problem-solving, finding alternatives, formulating, and providing information.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document