Conditioning left dorsal premotor cortex with low-frequency rTMS can sensitize the supramarginal gyrus to the disruptive effect of high-frequency online rTMS

2008 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Hartwigsen ◽  
T.O. Bergmann ◽  
S. Woerbel ◽  
O. Granert ◽  
H.R. Siebner
2007 ◽  
Vol 184 (4) ◽  
pp. 587-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berthold Langguth ◽  
Tobias Kleinjung ◽  
Elmar Frank ◽  
Michael Landgrebe ◽  
Philipp Sand ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manreena Kaur ◽  
Jessica A. Michael ◽  
Bernadette M. Fitzgibbon ◽  
Kate E. Hoy ◽  
Paul B. Fitzgerald

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sedlackova ◽  
I. Rektorova ◽  
Z. Fanfrdlova ◽  
I. Rektor

Aims: The results of our pilot study suggested that one session of high frequency rTMS applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) might induce measurable positive effects on executive functioning in patients with mild cognitive impairment of the vascular type without dementia (MCI-V). The aims of the current study were to replicate the results of our pilot study using a frameless stereotaxy as opposed to the standard and routinely used procedure. We also studied the effects of low frequency rTMS. Patients and method: Seven patients with MCI-V participated in a randomized, controlled, blind study with a crossover design. Each patient received 10 Hz and 1 Hz stimulation over the left DLPFC (an active stimulation site) or the motor cortex (MC; a control stimulation site). Frameless stereotaxy was used to target the DLPFC. The order of sites and frequencies was randomized. A short battery of neuropsychological tests was performed to evaluate executive function, working memory, and psychomotor speed. Results: One session of both high and low frequency rTMS was well tolerated and safe in terms of the cognitive after-effects in patients with MCI-V. We did not observe any significant frequency dependent or stimulation site-dependent cognitive effects of rTMS. Conclusion: We found neither positive nor negative significant effect of either low or high frequency rTMS applied over the DLPFC or the MC, while a mild positive site-specific effect of 10 Hz rTMS was observed in our pilot study on the Stroop interference results. These results suggested that MCI-V is a heterogeneous and poorly defined entity and, thus, rTMS might be useful in a subpopulation of this group of patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Psurek ◽  
Bradley Ross King ◽  
Joseph Classen ◽  
Jost-Julian Rumpf

AbstractMotor skills are acquired and refined across alternating phases of practice (online) and subsequent consolidation in the absence of further skill execution (offline). Both stages of learning are sustained by dynamic interactions within a widespread motor learning network including the premotor and primary motor cortices. Here, we aimed to investigate the role of the dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC) and its interaction with the primary motor cortex (M1) during motor memory consolidation. Forty-eight healthy human participants (age 22.1 ± 3.1 years) were assigned to three different groups corresponding to either low-frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of left dPMC, rTMS of left M1, or sham rTMS. rTMS was applied immediately after explicit motor sequence training with the right hand. Motor evoked potentials were recorded before training and after rTMS to assess potential stimulation-induced changes in corticospinal excitability (CSE). Participants were retested on motor sequence performance after eight hours to assess consolidation. While rTMS of dPMC significantly increased CSE and rTMS of M1 significantly decreased CSE, no CSE modulation was induced by sham rTMS. However, all groups demonstrated similar significant offline learning indicating that consolidation was not modulated by the post-training low-frequency rTMS intervention despite evidence of an interaction of dPMC and M1 at the level of CSE. Motor memory consolidation ensuing explicit motor sequence training seems to be a rather robust process that is not affected by low-frequency rTMS-induced perturbations of dPMC or M1. Findings further indicate that consolidation of explicitly acquired motor skills is neither mediated nor reflected by post-training CSE.


Author(s):  
Yupeng Du ◽  
Li Wei ◽  
Huangwei Jiang

Abstract Objective To study the improvements and mechanism of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on swallowing disorders after cerebral infarction. Methods A total of 60 patients with swallowing disorders were randomly assigned to receive high/low-frequency rTMS treatment, another 30 patients without rTMS treatment were included in the control group. The Kubota’s water-swallowing test, video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), and major intracranial neurotransmitters were analyzed before and after treatment. Results No significant difference was observed in the Kubota’s water-swallowing test scores, the VFSS scores, or the levels of intracranial neurotransmitters between the three groups before treatment. The Kubota’s water-swallowing test scores were significantly reduced after high-frequency rTMS treatment than in the control group; the aspiration degree was significantly increased after high-frequency rTMS treatment than in the control group; the levels of glutamate and dopamine were significantly increased after high-frequency rTMS treatment than in the control group; Moreover, the Kubota’s water-swallowing test scores were significantly reduced after high-frequency rTMS treatment than after low-frequency rTMS treatment; the levels of glutamate and dopamine were significantly increased after high-frequency rTMS treatment than after low-frequency rTMS treatment. Conclusions High-frequency rTMS was effective for swallowing disorders, which may be related to increased levels of intracranial glutamate and dopamine.


2010 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 262-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Kurata

It has been suggested that the dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) may contribute to conditional motor behavior. Thus when a selection is instructed by arbitrary conditional cues, it is possible that the unilateral PMd affects behavior, regardless of which arm, contra- or ipsilateral, is to be used. We examined this possibility by recording neuronal activity and injecting muscimol into the caudal PMd (PMdc) of monkeys while they were performing a reaching task toward visuospatial targets with either the right or left arm, as instructed by low-frequency or high-frequency tone signals. Following the injection of a small amount of muscimol (1 μL; 5 μg/μL) into the unilateral PMdc, monkeys exhibited two major deficits in behavioral performance: 1) erroneous selection of the arm not indicated by the instruction (selection errors) and 2) no movement initiation in response to a visuospatial target cue serving as a trigger signal for reaching within the reaction time limit (movement initiation errors). Errors were observed following unilateral muscimol injection into both right and left PMdc, although selection errors occurred with significantly greater frequency in the arm contralateral to the injection site. By contrast, movement initiation errors were more commonly observed in left-arm trials, regardless of whether the right or left PMdc was inactivated. Notably, errors rarely occurred following a ventral PM muscimol injection. These results suggest that the left and right PMdc cooperate to transform conditional sensory cues into appropriate motor output and can affect both contra- and ipsilateral body movement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document