scholarly journals Familiarity and task context shape the use of acoustic information in voice identity perception

Cognition ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 104780
Author(s):  
Nadine Lavan ◽  
Jens Kreitewolf ◽  
Jonas Obleser ◽  
Carolyn McGettigan
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Kreitewolf ◽  
Nadine Lavan ◽  
Jonas Obleser ◽  
Carolyn McGettigan

Familiar and unfamiliar voice perception are often understood as being distinct from each other. For identity perception, theoretical work has proposed that listeners use acoustic information in different ways to perceive identity from familiar and unfamiliar voices: Unfamiliar voices are thought to be processed based on close comparisons of acoustic properties, while familiar voices are processed based on diagnostic acoustic features that activate a stored person-specific representation of that voice. To date no empirical study has directly examined whether and how familiar and unfamiliar listeners differ in their use of acoustic information for identity perception. Here, we tested this theoretical claim by linking listeners’ judgements in voice identity tasks to complex acoustic representations—spectral similarity of the heard voice recordings. Participants (N=150) who were either familiar or unfamiliar with a set of voices completed an identity discrimination task (Experiment 1) or an identity sorting task (Experiment 2). In both experiments, identity judgements for familiar and unfamiliar voices alike were guided by spectral similarity: Pairs of recordings with greater acoustic similarity were more likely to be perceived as belonging to the same voice identity. However, while there were no differences in how familiar and unfamiliar listeners used acoustic information for identity discrimination, differences were apparent for identity sorting. Our study therefore challenges proposals that view familiar and unfamiliar voice perception as being at all times distinct and suggests a critical role of the listening situation in which familiar and unfamiliar voices are evaluated.


NeuroImage ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. 681-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew X. Lowe ◽  
Jason P. Gallivan ◽  
Susanne Ferber ◽  
Jonathan S. Cant
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret M. Clifford ◽  
Fen-chang Chou

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 514-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon A. Mutter ◽  
Jenniffer C. Naylor ◽  
Emily R. Patterson

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 867-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darlene Floden ◽  
Antonino Vallesi ◽  
Donald T. Stuss

The ability to step outside a routine—to select a new response over a habitual one—is a cardinal function of the frontal lobes. A large body of neuroimaging work now exists pointing to increased activation within the anterior cingulate when stimuli evoke competing responses (incongruent trials) relative to when responses converge (congruent trials). However, lesion evidence that the ACC is necessary in this situation is inconsistent. We hypothesized that this may be a consequence of different task procedures (context) used in lesion and neuroimaging studies. The present study attempted to reconcile the lesion and the fMRI findings by having subjects perform clinical and experimental versions of the Stroop task during BOLD fMRI acquisition. We examined the relationship of brain activation patterns, specifically within the anterior cingulate and left dorsolateral frontal regions, to congruent and incongruent trial types in different task presentations or contexts. The results confirmed our hypothesis that ACC activity is relatively specific to unblocked–uncued incongruent Stroop conditions that have not been used in large neuropsychological studies. Moreover, the size of the behavioral Stroop interference effect was significantly correlated with activity in ACC and left dorsolateral regions, although in different directions. The current results are discussed in terms of previous proposals for the functional roles of these regions in activating, monitoring, and task setting, and the relation of these findings to the disparate reports in recent case series is considered.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-31
Author(s):  
Liang Xiao ◽  
Yanli Pei

A physical distribution task has typical characteristics of dynamic mobility: dynamic locations, time criticality, and environmental complexity. Research has focused on creating an environmental and task adaptive knowledge service system to support collaborative management of the physical distribution tasks. In this paper, four task context functions are established on the basis of defining customer context, product context, resource context, and network context of distribution task. A task context aware collaborative distribution knowledge service system is built with elaboration and discussion of the service system using an example of distribution center.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Bukowski ◽  
Miguel Moya ◽  
Soledad de Lemus ◽  
Andrzej Szmajke

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 1537-1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Johnson ◽  
Carolyn McGettigan ◽  
Nadine Lavan

Identity sorting tasks, in which participants sort multiple naturally varying stimuli of usually two identities into perceived identities, have recently gained popularity in voice and face processing research. In both modalities, participants who are unfamiliar with the identities tend to perceive multiple stimuli of the same identity as different people and thus fail to “tell people together.” These similarities across modalities suggest that modality-general mechanisms may underpin sorting behaviour. In this study, participants completed a voice sorting and a face sorting task. Taking an individual differences approach, we asked whether participants’ performance on voice and face sorting of unfamiliar identities is correlated. Participants additionally completed a voice discrimination (Bangor Voice Matching Test) and a face discrimination task (Glasgow Face Matching Test). Using these tasks, we tested whether performance on sorting related to explicit identity discrimination. Performance on voice sorting and face sorting tasks was correlated, suggesting that common modality-general processes underpin these tasks. However, no significant correlations were found between sorting and discrimination performance, with the exception of significant relationships for performance on “same identity” trials with “telling people together” for voices and faces. Overall, any reported relationships were however relatively weak, suggesting the presence of additional modality-specific and task-specific processes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document