Micro-machinability of injection molded polyamide 6 polymer and glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composite

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 85-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emel Kuram
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhua Wang ◽  
Yingwei Zhang ◽  
Yong Yi ◽  
Dengwang Lai ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 254 ◽  
pp. 112850
Author(s):  
Yucheng Zhong ◽  
Ping Liu ◽  
Qingxiang Pei ◽  
Viacheslav Sorkin ◽  
Athanasius Louis Commillus ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-212
Author(s):  
Xi Cheng ◽  
Jianming Wu ◽  
Chenguang Yao ◽  
Guisheng Yang

This study compared thermal degradation, pyrolysis behavior, and the fire behavior of flame-retarded glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide 6 with aluminum hypophosphite and aluminum phenylphosphinate (BPA-Al), respectively. We sythesize aluminum phenylphosphinate by benzenephosphinic acid (BPA) and AlCl3.6H2O in water. so we call aluminum phenylphosphinate BPA-Al for short. The dependence of limiting oxygen index on phosphorus content was linear for aluminum hypophosphite and BPA-Al. Thermogravimetric analysis proved aluminum hypophosphite was less stable than BPA-Al. Thermogravimetric-Fourier transform infrared tests showed that aluminum hypophosphite system balanced the charring process and the gas releasing well, and that BPA-Al system enhanced the charring process and decreased the gas releasing. Peak heat release rate and total heat release data proved that aluminum hypophosphite system was superior to BPA-Al system in lowering the heat release. Their differences were caused by different P-H (aluminum hypophosphite) and P-phenyl (BPA-Al) structures. P-H structure did better than P-phenyl structure in balancing the condensed phase effect and the gaseous phase action. So P-H structure (aluminum hypophosphite) was more suitable than P-phenyl structure (BPA-Al) in the flame retardancy of glass-fiber-reinforced polyamide 6.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document