DMSO improves long-term dentin bonding of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. e27-e28
Author(s):  
T.H.S. Stape ◽  
L. Tjäderhane ◽  
A. Szesz ◽  
A.D. Loguercio ◽  
L.R.M. Martins
Keyword(s):  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch

Longevity of Self-etch Dentin Bonding Adhesives Compared to Etch-and-rinse Dentin Bonding Adhesives: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nader Masarwa ◽  
Ahmed Mohamed ◽  
Iyad Abou-Rabii ◽  
Rawan Abu Zaghlan ◽  
Liviu Steier
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch

scholarly journals Short- and Long-Term Dentin Bond Strength of Bioactive Glass-Modified Dental Adhesives

Nanomaterials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1894
Author(s):  
Ramona Oltramare ◽  
Matej Par ◽  
Dirk Mohn ◽  
Daniel B. Wiedemeier ◽  
Thomas Attin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Dental Adhesives ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Self Etch

This study investigated the short- and long-term effects of dental adhesives doped with nano-sized bioactive glass 45S5 (BAG) on the resin–dentin interfacial bond strength. Two etch-and-rinse adhesives (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (ASB) and Solobond Plus (SB)) and one self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond (CF)) were doped with different concentrations of BAG (5, 10, and 20 wt%). The unmodified (0 wt% BAG) commercial adhesives served as control groups. Dentin of 120 molars (n = 10 per group) was treated with the different adhesives, followed by buildups with a conventional composite restorative material. From each tooth, 14 sticks were prepared for micro-tensile bond strength (µTBS) testing. The sticks were stored in simulated body fluid at 37 °C and tested after 24 h or six months for µTBS and failure mode. Data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis tests in combination with post-hoc Conover-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests at a level of significance of a = 0.05. After 24 h and six months, both etch-and-rinse adhesives with a low BAG content (up to 10 wt% for ASB and 5 wt% for SB) showed similar µTBSs as their respective control groups (0 wt% BAG). CF showed a significant decrease in µTBS even after addition of 5 wt% BAG. At a high concentration of added BAG (20 wt%), all three adhesives showed a significant decrease in µTBS compared to the unmodified controls. The CF control group showed significantly lower µTBS after 6 months of storage than after 24 h. In contrast, the µTBS of all CF groups modified with BAG was unaffected by aging. In conclusion, the tested etch-and-rinse adhesives can be modified with up to 5 wt% (SB), or 10 wt% (ASB) of BAG without reducing their short- and long-term dentin bond strength. Moreover, the addition of nano-sized BAG may prevent long-term bond strength deterioration of a self-etch adhesive.

scholarly journals Effect of Dentin Pretreatment with Arginine on Microshear Bond Strength of Etch-and-Rinse or Self-Etch Adhesive Systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (02) ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Gabriela Oliveira Borgo ◽  
Waldemir Francisco Vieira-Junior ◽  
Jéssica Dias Theobaldo ◽  
Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar ◽  
Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Fracture Pattern ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Sem Images ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Self Etch

Abstract Objective The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of dentin pretreatment with 8% arginine on the immediate and 6-month bond strength (BS) of adhesive systems and surface morphology of dentin. Materials and Methods Dentin bovine specimens (5 × 5 mm) were allocated into following pretreatments: without pretreatment (conventional technique, C) or exposure to arginine solution (A) for 5 minutes prior to tooth restoration. The adhesive procedure was performed using (n = 12): 3-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Scotchbond Multipurpose—SBMP [C+SBMP and A+SBMP]); 2-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Single Bond 2 - SB [C+SB and A+SB]); or 2-step self-etch adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond - CSEB [C+CSEB and A+CSEB]). After 24 hours, the composite resin restorations were evaluated immediately and after 6 months of water storage using a microshear test and fracture pattern. The dentin surface exposed to A was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The immediate BS data were submitted to a two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test, and the long-term BS results were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn tests (α = 0.05). Results There was a significant decrease in immediate and 6-month BS for the A+SB and A+CSEB groups, which differed statistically from the C group. The fracture pattern was predominantly adhesive for SB and CSEB adhesive for C and A. The SEM images presented a different conditioning pattern of the dentin exposed to A. Conclusion The dentin pretreatment with arginine interfered negatively in the immediate and long-term BS of the simplified adhesive system. However, the SBMP adhesive was not affected by arginine pretreatment presenting the most satisfactory results.

scholarly journals Overview of Clinical Alternatives to Minimize the Degradation of the Resin-dentin Bonds

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. E103-E127 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Reis ◽  
M Carrilho ◽  
L Breschi ◽  
AD Loguercio
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Oral Environment ◽  
Aging Mechanisms ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Acidic Resin

SUMMARY The incorporation of hydrophilic and acidic resin monomers substantially improved the initial bonding of contemporary etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) adhesives to intrinsically wet dental substrates, providing quite favorable immediate results, regardless of the bonding approach used. However, in the long term, the bonding effectiveness of most simplified ER and SE adhesives drop dramatically. This review examines the fundamental processes that are responsible for the aging mechanisms involved in the degradation of the resin-bonded interfaces and some possible clinical approaches that have been effective in minimizing or even preventing the degradation of the adhesive interfaces produced with simplified adhesives. The incorporation of some of the feasible approaches - described in this review - may improve the quality of the adhesive restorations performed in clinical practice, while manufacturers develop bonding materials that are less susceptible to the aging mechanisms present in the oral environment.

scholarly journals Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kabun Yamauchi ◽  
Akimasa Tsujimoto ◽  
Carlos A. Jurado ◽  
Yusuke Shimatani ◽  
Yuko Nagura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Universal Adhesives ◽  
Self Etch

Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1101-1107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan W.V. van Dijken ◽  
Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg ◽  
A. Lindberg
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Term Retention ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Long Term Retention ◽  
Self Etch

Two Adhesive Systems-effect on Adhesion to Tooth Structure

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 2608-2613
Author(s):  
Larisa Simona Deac ◽  
Kamel Earar ◽  
Adela Loredana Colceriu Burtea ◽  
Alexandra Stefania Berghe ◽  
Aurora Antoniac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Hybrid Layer ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Selective Etch ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Wisdom Teeth ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Group 1

This study evaluates and compares by dye penetration method and SEM photomicrographs the sealing obtained using two different classes of adhesive systems (etch-and-rinse and self-etch with selective etching) with SDR (Dentsply) bulk fill composite. 84 class V cavities were prepared on oral and vestibular face of 42 intact, freshly extracted wisdom teeth. The cavities were randomly divided in two groups and restored: Group 1 with prime &bond one select (Dentsply) and SDR (Dentsply) and Group 2 with prime&bond one Etch&Rinse (Dentsply) and SDR (Dentsply). Prime&bond one Select (Dentsply) is a single component adhesive and can be used in self etch mode, in selective enamel etch mode, or in etch-and-rinse mode. We chosen for this study the selective etch of the enamel mode. Prime&bond one Etch Rinse (Dentsply) is a universal etch-and-rinse one-bottle dental adhesive, designed to be used in two steps. The bulk fill composites are commonly used in modern dentistry due to their properties of low polymerization shrinkage and curing in layer of 4 mm depth, offering the practitioner a fast clinical procedure with good results. The results showed a good sealing at enamel and dentin margins with no statistically significant difference between adhesives, even though the mean of enamel infiltration was smaller for Group1. Furthermore the results show that there were differences between the two groups, for the infiltrations at the enamel, the values of microleakage being arithmetically higher for Group 1, but with no statistically difference between the two groups.SEM images showed for both groups a good adhesion surface with the tooth, but the hybrid layer of the total-etch adhesives is different from the hybrid layer formed by self etch adhesives, in terms of thickness, uniformity. In conclusion both adhesive systems have equivalent sealing qualities and can be successfully used with SDR.

Deproteinization of caries-affected dentin with chemo-mechanical caries removal agents and its effect on dentin bonding with self-etch adhesives

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 103665
Author(s):  
Citra Kusumasari ◽  
Ahmed Abdou ◽  
Masatoshi Nakajima ◽  
Junji Tagami
Keyword(s):  
Dentin Bonding ◽  
Caries Removal ◽  
Self Etch
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document