Slack free connections to improve seismic behavior of tension-only braces: An experimental and analytical study

2017 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 54-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Amin Mousavi ◽  
Seyed Mehdi Zahrai
2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongying Dong ◽  
Wanlin Cao ◽  
Haipeng Wu ◽  
Qiyun Qiao ◽  
Chuanpeng Yu

2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (02) ◽  
pp. 1350006 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. W. KIM ◽  
M. KAWATANI ◽  
T. KANBARA ◽  
N. NISHIMURA

This paper investigated dynamic responses of steel monorail bridges incorporating train-bridge interaction under strong earthquakes. Two types of steel monorail bridges were considered in the study: a conventional type with steel track-girder; an advanced type with composite track-girder and simplified lateral bracing system. During strong earthquakes, monorail train was assumed standing on the track-girder of monorail bridges. Observations through the analytical study showed that considering the monorail train as additional mass rather than a dynamic system in numerical modeling overestimated effect of the train load on seismic performance of monorail bridges. Earlier plastic deformations at the end bracing of the girder system absorbed seismic energy and reduced the stress at the pier base.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. e1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Mehdi Zahrai ◽  
Seyed Amin Mousavi ◽  
Murat Saatcioglu

1993 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 1866-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Roeder ◽  
Stephen P. Schneider ◽  
James E. Carpenter

2010 ◽  
Vol 163-167 ◽  
pp. 1300-1306
Author(s):  
Pu Yang ◽  
Jing Tang

Using flexibility-based finite element method based on fiber model, several experiments of reinforced concrete specially shaped columns under cyclic loading which cross section is ‘L’, ‘T’ and ‘+’ shape with different longitudinal reinforcement and hoop reinforcement have been simulated, and the seismic behavior of columns such as strength, ductility and energy dissipation are analyzed. Results from the analytical study indicate that: 1) ductility of the column increases as quantity of hoop reinforcement increases. 2) strength capacity of the column increase linearly as ratio of longitudinal reinforcement increase, but is not seriously affected by hoop reinforcement; 3) energy dissipation capacity of the column is not significantly affected by hoop and longitudinal reinforcement, particularly in slightly nonlinear range.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document