scholarly journals Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing

2018 ◽  
Vol 366 ◽  
pp. 50-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori L. Holt ◽  
Adam T. Tierney ◽  
Giada Guerra ◽  
Aeron Laffere ◽  
Frederic Dick
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bathe-Peters ◽  
R. Fleischmann ◽  
S. Schmidt ◽  
S.A. Brandt

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Galit Agmon ◽  
Paz Har-Shai Yahav ◽  
Michal Ben-Shachar ◽  
Elana Zion Golumbic

AbstractDaily life is full of situations where many people converse at the same time. Under these noisy circumstances, individuals can employ different listening strategies to deal with the abundance of sounds around them. In this fMRI study we investigated how applying two different listening strategies – Selective vs. Distributed attention – affects the pattern of neural activity. Specifically, in a simulated ‘cocktail party’ paradigm, we compared brain activation patterns when listeners attend selectively to only one speaker and ignore all others, versus when they distribute their attention and attempt to follow two or four speakers at the same time. Results indicate that the two attention types activate a highly overlapping, bilateral fronto-temporal-parietal network of functionally connected regions. This network includes auditory association cortex (bilateral STG/STS) and higher-level regions related to speech processing and attention (bilateral IFG/insula, right MFG, left IPS). Within this network, responses in specific areas were modulated by the type of attention required. Specifically, auditory and speech-processing regions exhibited higher activity during Distributed attention, whereas fronto-parietal regions were activated more strongly during Selective attention. This pattern suggests that a common perceptual-attentional network is engaged when dealing with competing speech-inputs, regardless of the specific task at hand. At the same time, local activity within nodes of this network varies when implementing different listening strategies, reflecting the different cognitive demands they impose. These results nicely demonstrate the system’s flexibility to adapt its internal computations to accommodate different task requirements and listener goals.Significance StatementHearing many people talk simultaneously poses substantial challenges for the human perceptual and cognitive systems. We compared neural activity when listeners applied two different listening strategy to deal with these competing inputs: attending selectively to one speaker vs. distributing attention among all speakers. A network of functionally connected brain regions, involved in auditory processing, language processing and attentional control was activated when applying both attention types. However, activity within this network was modulated by the type of attention required and the number of competing speakers. These results suggest a common ‘attention to speech’ network, providing the computational infrastructure to deal effectively with multi-speaker input, but with sufficient flexibility to implement different prioritization strategies and to adapt to different listener goals.


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 4623-4632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Starzynski ◽  
Alexander Gutschalk

Cortex ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 387-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitta Tóth ◽  
Ferenc Honbolygó ◽  
Orsolya Szalárdy ◽  
Gábor Orosz ◽  
Dávid Farkas ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
REBECCA A. HANSON ◽  
JAMES W. MONTGOMERY

This study investigated the potential influences of general processing capacity and sustained selective attention on the temporal processing of a group of children with specific language impairment (SLI) and a group of age-matched (CA) controls. Children completed a sustained selective auditory attention task and two speech processing tasks, the Speech Identification Task, representing a cognitively more complex task, and a standard speech discrimination task, representing a cognitively less complex task. The speech stimuli included two-formant, 40-ms transition [ba] and [da] consonant–vowel (CV) syllables and the nonstop CV syllable [sa]. We hypothesized, in accordance with Tallal's temporal processing deficit view, that if SLI children have a fundamental deficit in temporal processing, they should demonstrate poor performance on both speech processing tasks relative to CA children. By contrast, if the temporal processing problem of SLI children relates to a limitation in general processing capacity, the SLI children should show better performance on the discrimination task compared to the identification task. Alternatively, if poor sustained selective attention mediates SLI children's poor temporal processing, the SLI children should show poor performance on an independent measure of auditory attention, which in turn should account for a portion of the variance in any observed group differences in temporal processing. Results showed no group difference in sustained selective auditory attention. On the identification task, group, stimulus-type, and interaction effects emerged. SLI children performed more poorly than CA children, and stop CV syllables were identified less frequently than the nonstop CV syllable. On the discrimination task, there were no main effects or interactions for accuracy (Á score). For the reaction time analysis, only a stimulus-type effect was found, with children responding faster to the /sa/ syllable. Results were interpreted to suggest that these SLI children did not evidence a basic temporal processing deficit. Rather, the SLI children's poor identification task performance was interpreted to reflect an interaction between these children's more limited general processing capacity and the nature of the task.


NeuroImage ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Nigbur ◽  
J. Schneider ◽  
W. Sommer ◽  
O. Dimigen ◽  
B. Stürmer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document