Microtensile bond strength of composite resin and glass ionomer cement with total-etching or self-etching universal adhesive

2018 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 36-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laís S. Munari ◽  
Alberto N.G. Antunes ◽  
Débora D.H. Monteiro ◽  
Allyson N. Moreira ◽  
Hugo H. Alvim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Total Etching ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals To Evaluate Shear Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Theracal Lc, Biodentine, and Resin–Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Mode of Fracture: An In Vitro Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (02) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Salil Mehra ◽  
Ashu K. Gupta ◽  
Bhanu Pratap Singh ◽  
Mandeep Kaur ◽  
Ashwath Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Abstract Introduction The aim of the current study was to evaluate shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to Theracal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using universal adhesive and mode of fracture. Materials and Methods A total of 50 caries-free maxillary and mandibular molars extracted were taken; occlusal cavities were prepared, mounted in acrylic blocks, and divided into five groups based on the liner used. Group 1: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 12 minutes. Group 2: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 14 days. Group 3: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Group 4: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 7 days. Group 5: Theracal LC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Each sample was bonded to resin composite using universal adhesive. Shear bond strength analysis was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis  Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance and posthoc Bonferroni test using SPSS version 22.0. Results and Conclusion Biodentine liner when bonded immediately to resin composite showed minimum shear bond strength. RMGIC when bonded to resin composite after 7 days showed maximum shear bond strength. Mode of fracture was predominantly cohesive in groups having Biodentine and Theracal LC as liner.

Effects of Cyclic Stressing on Attachment Bond Strength using Glass Ionomer Cement and Composite Resin

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. C. Moseley ◽  
E. N. Horrocks ◽  
G. J. Pearson ◽  
E. H. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

A Fluoride-containing Composite Resin—An In Vitro Study of a New Material for Orthodontic Bonding

1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Cook ◽  
C. C. Youngson
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
The Other ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
New Material ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The shear/peel bond strength of a new material, a ‘hybrid’ of a composite resin and a glass ionomer cement, was compared in vitro with the bond strengths of a composite resin and of a glass ionomer cement. The new material had a significantly greater bond strength than the other materials tested and its properties were very similar to the composite resin. Unlike the glass ionomer cement, etching of the enamel before applying the adhesive is required. The clinical indications for using this new cement are discussed.

Factors affecting the bond strength of composite resin to etched glass-ionomer cement

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. Welbury ◽  
J.F. McCabe ◽  
J.J. Murray ◽  
S. Rusby
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin Reinforced Chemical Cure Glass Ionomer, Conventional Chemical Cure Glass Ionomer and Chemical Cure Composite Resin in Direct Bonding Systems: An in vitro Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Praveen Kumar Reddy ◽  
Kolasani Srinivasa Rao ◽  
Garlapati Yugandhar ◽  
B Sunil Kumar ◽  
SN Chandrasekhar Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Bonding System ◽  
Bonding Systems ◽  
Ionomer Cement

ABSTRACT The acid pretreatment and use of composite resins as the bonding medium has disadvantages like scratching and loss of surface enamel, decalcification, etc. To overcome disadvantages of composite resins, glass ionomers and its modifications are being used for bonding. The study was conducted to evaluate the efficiency of resin reinforced glass ionomer as a direct bonding system with conventional glass ionomer cement and composite resin. The study showed that shear bond strength of composite resin has the higher value than both resin reinforced glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer cement in both 1 and 24 hours duration and it increased from 1 to 24 hours in all groups. The shear bond strength of resin reinforced glass ionomer cement was higher than the conventional glass ionomer cement in both 1 and 24 hours duration. Conditioning with polyacrylic acid improved the bond strength of resin reinforced glass ionomer cement significantly but not statistically significant in the case of conventional glass ionomer cement. How to cite this article Rao KS, Reddy TPK, Yugandhar G, Kumar BS, Reddy SNC, Babu DA. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Resin Reinforced Chemical Cure Glass Ionomer, Conventional Chemical Cure Glass Ionomer and Chemical Cure Composite Resin in Direct Bonding Systems: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(1):21-25.

Bond strength of Ion-releasing Restorative Materials to Sound and Caries-affected Dentin

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-34
Author(s):  
Gül Keskin ◽  
Zübeyde Uçar Gündoğar ◽  
Merve Yaman ◽  
Gün Burak Tek
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Adhesive Failure ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Ionomer Cement ◽  
Bond Durability

Objective: This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of ion-releasing restorative materials to sound and caries-affected dentin (CAD). Study design: 60 teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (sound dentin, CAD) and 5 subgroups of 6 samples each: conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified GIC (RMGIC), glass hybrid reinforced GIC (EQ), giomer (BII), and bioactive restorative material (ACT). μTBS analyses were performed and data were analyzed statistically. Results: The ACT group bonded to sound dentin and the BII group bonded to CAD showed the highest μTBS (p<0.05). The GIC, RMGIC, and ACT groups, showed significantly lower μTBS when bonded to CAD compared with sound dentin (p<0.05). However, in the BII group, there were no statistically significant differences between the samples bonded to sound and CAD (p>0.05). All groups except EQ that bonded to sound dentin showed predominantly adhesive failure. Conclusion: The use of the giomer can be recommended due to its more stable bond durability.

An in vitro Study of the Bond Strength of a Glass Ionomer Cement in the Direct Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A Cook ◽  
C. C. Youngson
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Tooth Surface ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The shear/peel bond strength of a ‘no-mix’ composite orthodontic bonding resin was compared in vitro with that of a glass ionomer cement. The effect of pre-treatment of the enamel, with either phosphoric acid or polyacrylic acid, prior to using the glass ionomer cement was also assessed. The composite resin had a significantly higher bond strength than the glass ionomer cement. Simple prophylaxis and drying of the enamel achieved the best results when using the glass ionomer cement, whilst etching the tooth surface with phosphoric acid produced a significantly poorer bond to the enamel. Investigation of the site of failure showed the composite resin bonded very well to the tooth and less well to the bracket, whilst the glass ionomer adhered significantly better to the bracket base than to the tooth surface.

scholarly journals Shear bond strength of Biodentine, ProRoot MTA, glass ionomer cement and composite resin on human dentine ex vivo

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Kaup ◽  
Christoph Heinrich Dammann ◽  
Edgar Schäfer ◽  
Till Dammaschke
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Human Dentine ◽  
Ionomer Cement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document