Trace fossils and depositional environments in the Hawaz Formation, Middle Ordovician, western Libya

2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 28-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi M. de Gibert ◽  
Emilio Ramos ◽  
Mariano Marzo
Keyword(s):  
Trace Fossils ◽  
Depositional Environments ◽  
Middle Ordovician

Carboniferous records of the Zoophycos group of trace fossils from England, Wales, the Isle of Man and the North Sea

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-145
Author(s):  
Duncan McLean ◽  
Matthew Booth ◽  
David J. Bodman ◽  
Finlay D. McLean
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Trace Fossils ◽  
Depositional Environments ◽  
Common Component ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Clastic Rocks ◽  
Isle Of Man ◽  
The North ◽  
The North Sea ◽  
Supplementary Material

The Zoophycos group of trace fossils is common in Carboniferous to recent marine strata and sediments, and is a common component of ichnofaunas in the Visean and Namurian stages of England and Wales. A review of new and published records indicates that it is often present in limestones and sandstones of Chadian to Arnsbergian age. Thereafter it is less common, and restricted to clastic rocks. There are no known records within Carboniferous strata above the lowest Westphalian. The form is most common and often abundant in limestones of the Yoredale facies in the upper Visean and lower Namurian stages of northern England, particularly so in northern Northumberland. Where detailed sedimentological data exist, they indicate that the organisms responsible for the Zoophycos group burrowed into unconsolidated carbonate substrate that was deposited under low accumulation rates, often affected by storm wave action and where seawater flow provided a nutrient supply. However, in mixed carbonate–clastic settings, the deep-tier nature of Zoophycos may indicate that the organism lived in overlying shallow-marine, clastic-dominated depositional environments and burrowed down into the carbonate substrate. The same may be true of siliciclastic depositional settings where the presence of Zoophycos in some sandstones may reflect the palaeoenvironment of the overlying, finer-grained transgressive marine (prodelta and distal mouth bar) deposits.Supplementary material: A spreadsheet with details of Carboniferous records of Zoophycos group fossils from England, Wales, the Isle of Man and the North Sea is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4994636

Devonian depositional environments in the Darwin Mountains: Marine or non-marine?

1993 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken J. Woolfe
Keyword(s):  
Fresh Water ◽  
Depositional Environment ◽  
Trace Fossils ◽  
Depositional Environments ◽  
Trace Fossil ◽  
Glacier Area ◽  
Red Beds ◽  
Fossil Assemblage ◽  
Considerable Debate

The depositional environment of the Devonian Taylor Group has been subject to considerable debate for over 30 years. The debate stems largely from a belief that the abundant and diverse trace fossils represent a marine ichnofauna, whereas sedimentary features, including palaeosols, desiccation polygons and red beds, are more typical of a non-marine setting. The debate is reconciled by a reinterpretation of the trace fossil assemblage which shows that the trace fossils comprise a typical fresh water (Scoyenia ichnofacies) assemblage, and their occurrence in the Taylor Group in the Darwin Glacier area is entirely consistent with deposition in a mixed fluvial-lacustrine-subaerial environment.

Trace fossils in Ordovician radiolarian chert successions in the Southern Uplands, Scotland

2016 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Kakuwa ◽  
James D. Floyd
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Trace Fossils ◽  
The Other ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Animal Life ◽  
Radiolarian Chert ◽  
Benthic Animal ◽  
Middle Ordovician ◽  
Firm Evidence ◽  
Benthic Animals

ABSTRACTRadiolarian chert and associated siliceous claystone in the Southern Uplands of Scotland are examined, in order to study the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event of benthic animals on the pelagic ocean bottom. Trace fossils which are uncommon, but convincing, are found in the grey chert and siliceous claystone of Gripps Cleuch. These observations constitute firm evidence that large benthic animals which could leave visible trace fossils had colonised the Iapetan Ocean by the late Middle Ordovician, confirming previous studies from Australia for Panthalassa, the other huge ocean. Red chert is, however, a poor recorder of trace fossils, probably because the highly oxidising environment breaks down organic matter, both inhibiting high-density activity of large benthic animals and removing clear traces of benthic animal life.

The Fish River Subgroup in Namibia: stratigraphy, depositional environments and the Proterozoic–Cambrian boundary problem revisited

2005 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. 465-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. GEYER
Keyword(s):  
Trace Fossils ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Depositional Environments ◽  
Trace Fossil ◽  
Braided River ◽  
Shallow Marine ◽  
Sequence Stratigraphic ◽  
Marine Habitats ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Distinct Sequence

The Fish River Subgroup of the Nama Group, southern Namibia, is restudied in terms of lithostratigraphy and depositional environment. The study is based on partly fine-scaled sections, particularly of the Nababis and Gross Aub Formation. The results are generally in accordance with earlier studies. However, braided river deposits appear to be less widely distributed in the studied area, and a considerable part of the formations of the middle and upper subgroup apparently were deposited under shallowest marine conditions including upper shore-face. Evidence comes partly from sedimentary features and facies distribution, and partly from trace fossils, particularly Skolithos and the characteristic Trichophycus pedum. Environmental conditions represented by layers with T. pedum suggest that the producer favoured shallow marine habitats and transgressive regimes. The successions represent two deepening-upward sequences, both starting as fluvial (braided river) systems and ending as shallow marine tidally dominated environments. The first sequence includes the traditional Stockdale, Breckhorn and lower Nababis formations (Zamnarib Member). The second sequence includes the upper Nababis (Haribes Member) and Gross Aub formations. As a result, the Nababis and Gross Aub formations require emendation: a new formation including the Haribes and Rosenhof and possibly also the Deurstamp members. In addition, four distinct sequence stratigraphic units are deter-minable for the Fish River Subgroup in the southern part of the basin. The Proterozoic–Cambrian transition in southern Namibia is most probably located as low as the middle Schwarzrand Subgroup. The environmentally controlled occurrence of Trichophycus pedum undermines the local stratigraphic significance of this trace fossil which is eponymous with the lowest Cambrian and Phanerozoic trace fossil assemblage on a global scale. However, occurrences of such trace fossils have to be regarded as positive evidence for Phanerozoic age regardless of co-occurring body fossils. Other suggestions strongly dispute the concept of the formal Proterozoic–Cambrian and Precambrian–Phanerozoic boundary. Carbon isotope excursions and radiometric datings for the Nama Group do not help to calibrate precisely the temporal extent of the Fish River Subgroup. Fossil content, sequence stratigraphy and inferred depositional developments suggest that this subgroup represents only a short period of late orogenic molasse sedimentation during the early sub-trilobitic Early Cambrian.

The Early Ordovician Middle Shale Member (Am3) of the Amdeh Formation and further evidence of conodont faunas from the Sultanate of Oman

2018 ◽  
Vol 156 (08) ◽  
pp. 1357-1374 ◽  
Author(s):  
AP Heward ◽  
CG Miller ◽  
GA Booth
Keyword(s):  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Trace Fossils ◽  
Heavy Minerals ◽  
Sultanate Of Oman ◽  
Shallow Marine ◽  
Middle Ordovician ◽  
Early Ordovician ◽  
Coastal Deposits ◽  
Conodont Fauna ◽  
Gamma Ray Log

AbstractThe Middle Shale Member of the Amdeh Formation is interpreted to be of Early Ordovician age based on its trace fossils, stratigraphic context and a newly discovered fauna of conodonts. The member abruptly overlies the Lower Quartzite Member, which may be Early Cambrian, and passes gradationally-upward into the Upper Quartzite Member, which is probably Early–Middle Ordovician. The 542.5 m thick Middle Shale Member can be divided into two parts: a shaly lower part, and a sandy upper part that contains an influx of heavy minerals. Bioturbation by marine trace fossils is one of the most obvious characteristics of the member. The shales and sandstones are interpreted to be of Cruziana and Skolithos ichnofacies and represent shallow-marine shelf, shoreface, beach and coastal deposits. Sparse shelly fossils occur in the sandy upper part, principally bivalves, inarticulate brachiopods, ostracods and conodonts. The small assemblage of conodonts includes elements interpreted to be Tremadocian (Tetraprioniodus, Drepanoistodus, Drepanodus, Scolopodus, ?Tropodus, Semiacontiodus and Teridontus), and others which may be Floian or ancestral forms of Floian taxa (Balognathidae gen. et sp. indet. A & B and aff. Erraticodon). No acritarchs have been recovered, probably due to high temperatures experienced during burial to >6 km. It is likely that the Middle Shale Member is the seaward equivalent of the Mabrouk and Barakat formations, and an outcrop gamma-ray log supports such a correlation. The trace fossils, sedimentology, conodont fauna and the general lack of macrofossils are in keeping with the regional Tremadocian–Floian of the Arabian margin of Gondwana.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document