Seismic wavefield propagation in 2D anisotropic media: Ray theory versus wave-equation simulation

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-ying Bai ◽  
Guang-yi Hu ◽  
Yan-teng Zhang ◽  
Zhong-sheng Li
Geophysics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 653-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Spetzler ◽  
Roel Snieder

In seismic imaging experiments, it is common to use a geometric ray theory that is an asymptotic solution of the wave equation in the high‐frequency limit. Consequently, it is assumed that waves propagate along infinitely narrow lines through space, called rays, that join the source and receiver. In reality, recorded waves have a finite‐frequency content. The band limitation of waves implies that the propagation of waves is extended to a finite volume of space around the geometrical ray path. This volume is called the Fresnel volume. In this tutorial, we introduce the physics of the Fresnel volume and we present a solution of the wave equation that accounts for the band limitation of waves. The finite‐frequency wave theory specifies sensitivity kernels that linearly relate the traveltime and amplitude of band‐limited transmitted and reflected waves to slowness variations in the earth. The Fresnel zone and the finite‐frequency sensitivity kernels are closely connected through the concept of constructive interference of waves. The finite‐frequency wave theory leads to the counterintuitive result that a pointlike velocity perturbation placed on the geometric ray in three dimensions does not cause a perturbation of the phase of the wavefield. Also, it turns out that Fermat's theorem in the context of geometric ray theory is a special case of the finite‐frequency wave theory in the limit of infinite frequency. Last, we address the misconception that the width of the Fresnel volume limits the resolution in imaging experiments.


Geophysics ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 658-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Liu

In many areas offshore, the conventional seismic record has the appearance of a series of sine waves or simple odd harmonic combinations of sine waves, with a fundamental wave length four times the water depth. Burg, et al., in a ray theory treatment, ascribe this oscillatory phenomenon to guided energy traveling in the water layer. A solution of the pressure wave equation for a point source in the water layer has been obtained. It allows one to examine not only the frequency dependence with the depth, but also the transient amplitude response with depth and time. It is concluded that in most actual situations, the phenomenon cannot be wholly explained by the assumed mechanism, because the theory indicates too rapid a decay of the energy.


Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 591-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suhas Phadke ◽  
S. Kapotas ◽  
N. Dai ◽  
Ernest R. Kanasewich

Wave propagation in transversely isotropic media is governed by the horizontal and vertical wave velocities. The quasi‐P(qP) wavefront is not an ellipse; therefore, the propagation cannot be described by the wave equation appropriate for elliptically anisotropic media. However, for a limited range of angles from the vertical, the dispersion relation for qP‐waves can be approximated by an ellipse. The horizontal velocity necessary for this approximation is different from the true horizontal velocity and depends upon the physical properties of the media. In the method described here, seismic data is migrated using a 45-degree wave equation for elliptically anisotropic media with the horizontal velocity determined by comparing the 45-degree elliptical dispersion relation and the quasi‐P‐dispersion relation. The method is demonstrated for some synthetic data sets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document