The needs of the relatives in the adult intensive care unit: cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chilean-Spanish version of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 406-407
Author(s):  
Noelia Rojas Silva ◽  
Cristobal Padilla Fortunatti ◽  
Yerko Molina Muñoz ◽  
Macarena Amthauer Rojas
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-232
Author(s):  
Carmen Mabel Arroyo-Novoa ◽  
Milagros I. Figueroa-Ramos ◽  
Kathleen A. Puntillo ◽  
Céline Gélinas

Background The Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is recommended for evaluating pain behaviors in patients in the intensive care unit who are unable to report pain. The source of the only published Spanish version of the CPOT does not verify that it underwent a formal translation process. Objective To describe the translation into Spanish and cultural adaptation of the original French version of the CPOT. Methods Key persons in the translation process included one with a master’s degree in translation, a critical care physician, nurse faculty members with vast experience in intensive care units, and the instrument’s developer. This team followed the Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures as a guide to translate and culturally adapt the CPOT. Results The first Spanish-language version was back translated to French and was also compared with the English version. Revisions necessitated a second version, which was submitted to experts in critical care. Their modifications required a third version, which was back translated to French and discussed with the CPOT developer, after which a fourth version was created. Finally, a linguistic expert proofread the tool, and the translation leaders incorporated the recommendations, thereby obtaining a final Spanish version. Conclusion The Spanish version is ready to undergo validation with patients in the intensive care unit, which is the next step toward its use in assessing pain behaviors among patients in intensive care units where Spanish is spoken.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Josiele de Lima Neves ◽  
Eda Schwartz ◽  
Maria Elena Echevarria Guanilo ◽  
Simone Coelho Amestoy ◽  
Marjoriê da Costa Mendieta ◽  
...  

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar a produção científica relacionada às evidências acerca da satisfação de familiares de pacientes de UTI e os instrumentos utilizados para sua avaliação. Metodo: revisão integrativa na qual foram analisados artigos publicados entre 2005 e 2015, em inglês, português ou espanhol, nas bases de dados PUBMED/MEDLINE e LILACS e a biblioteca SciELO. Utilizou-se como estratégia de busca: personal satisfactional OR satisfaction AND family. Para coleta de dados dos artigos elaborou-se um instrumento com informações como: título, autores, ano de publicação e revista, objetivo do estudo, delineamento, participantes, local da pesquisa, temática principal e resultados. Resultados: atenderam aos critérios de inclusão 27 produções. Foram identificados quatro instrumentos utilizados para avaliar a satisfação de familiares de pacientes na UTI o Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey, Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit, Critical Care Family Needs Inventory e o Quality of Dying and Death. Os estudos abordaram a satisfação dos familiares em relação às suas necessidades e tomadas de decisão, satisfação quanto a cuidados paliativos, evidenciou-se, ainda, estudos de adaptação transcultural e validação de instrumentos. Quanto ao nível de evidência, os estudos se concentram nos níveis II a VI. Conclusão: a análise da produção científica sobre a satisfação de familiares de pacientes de UTI permitiu evidenciar que o fator que mais contribui na promoção da satisfação da família foi a qualidade do atendimento.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Rose ◽  
Sioban Nelson ◽  
Linda Johnston ◽  
Jeffrey J. Presneill

Background Responsibilities of critical care nurses for management of mechanical ventilation may differ among countries. Organizational interventions, including weaning protocols, may have a variable impact in settings that differ in nursing autonomy and interdisciplinary collaboration. Objective To characterize the role of Australian critical care nurses in the management of mechanical ventilation. Methods A 3-month, prospective cohort study was performed. All clinical decisions related to mechanical ventilation in a 24-bed, combined medical-surgical adult intensive care unit at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, a university-affiliated teaching hospital in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, were determined. Results Of 474 patients admitted during the 81-day study period, 319 (67%) received mechanical ventilation. Death occurred in 12.5% (40/319) of patients. Median durations of mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay were 0.9 and 1.9 days, respectively. A total of 3986 ventilation and weaning decisions (defined as any adjustment to ventilator settings, including mode change; rate or pressure support adjustment; and titration of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, or fraction of inspired oxygen) were made. Of these, 2538 decisions (64%) were made by nurses alone, 693 (17%) by medical staff, and 755 (19%) by nurses and staff in collaboration. Decisions made exclusively by nurses were less common for patients with predominantly respiratory disease or multiple organ dysfunction than for other patients. Conclusions In this unit, critical care nurses have high levels of responsibility for, and autonomy in, the management of mechanical ventilation and weaning. Revalidation of protocols for ventilation practices in other clinical contexts may be needed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e000304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mairi Mascarenhas ◽  
Michelle Beattie ◽  
Michelle Roxburgh ◽  
John MacKintosh ◽  
Noreen Clarke ◽  
...  

Managing pain is challenging in the intensive care unit (ICU) as often patients are unable to self-report due to the effects of sedation required for mechanical ventilation. Minimal sedative use and the utilisation of analgesia-first approaches are advocated as best practice to reduce unwanted effects of oversedation and poorly managed pain. Despite evidence-based recommendations, behavioural pain assessment tools are not readily implemented in many critical care units. A local telephone audit conducted in April 2017 found that only 30% of Scottish ICUs are using these validated pain instruments. The intensive care unit (ICU) at Raigmore Hospital, NHS Highland, initiated a quality improvement (QI) project using the Model for Improvement (MFI) to implement an analgesia-first approach utilising a validated and reliable behavioural pain assessment tool, namely the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT). Over a six-month period, the project deployed QI tools and techniques to test and implement the CPOT. The process measures related to (i) the nursing staff’s reliability to assess and document pain scores at least every four hours and (ii) to treat behavioural signs of pain or CPOT scores ≥ 3 with a rescue bolus of opioid analgesia. The findings from this project confirm that the observed trends in both process measures had reduced over time. Four hourly assessments of pain had increased to 89% and the treatment of CPOT scores ≥3 had increased to 100%.


Author(s):  
Kathryn Holliday ◽  
Rebecca Horner ◽  
Pavanasam Ramesh ◽  
Mark B. Bebbington ◽  
Constantinos Kanaris

AbstractTo accommodate the unprecedented demand for critical care beds during the first surge of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United Kingdom, hospitals had to adapt, restructure, and collaborate to provide the best possible care for the pediatric and adult populations. This single-center experience outlines the considerations our hospital took into account when planning for this restructure and the steps taken to ensure a successful execution of the task. Cross-specialty collaboration between the pediatric and adult critical care teams adopted a unique approach to care for only critically ill COVID-19 positive adult patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), transferring out critically unwell children at an early stage before the adult intensive care unit (AICU) became overwhelmed (nonhybrid model). This was designed to be in a staggered fashion, before allowing the AICU to overflow. This approach enabled the adult critical care team to support pediatric colleagues in learning the nuances of looking after critically ill adults prior to the service being saturated by the predicted supersurge. The success of the operation hinged on two things. First, PICU staff continuing to work in a familiar environment with their usual clinical team and second, the gradual and controlled admission of adult patients into PICU before the peak in demand for critical care beds. This design helped protect staff morale and build confidence in their new clinical role. The overall case fatality of invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 in our hospital during the first surge was 32%, which is lower than the global average of 45%. This serves as evidence that this nonhybrid model is safe and sustainable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document