Dorsal Fracture Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Treated by Open Reduction and Interfragmentary Screw Fixation: Indications, Approaches and Results

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Y. L. LEE ◽  
L. C. TEOH
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Joint Function ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Joint Congruity

Many operative and non-operative treatments of dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalageal (PIP) joint have been described. Return of good joint function requires anatomical reduction of the articular fragments and restoration of joint congruity and a stable functional arc of motion, with the fixation construct stable enough for early mobilization. To prevent recurrent dorsal subluxation, the attachments of the ligamentous palmar restraints and the bony buttress provided by the palmar lip of the middle phalanx base must be restored. Open reduction and internal interfragmentary screw fixation using 1.5 or 1.3 mm screws was employed in 12 fingers in 10 patients with unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIP joints of Schenck grades III and IV. At an average follow-up of 8.7 months, all patients in this series achieved good to excellent results and an average total active interphalangeal motion of 132° (range 105°–165°). Additional benefits over non-operative techniques included improved patient comfort and simplified nursing care and therapy supervision.

Results of Treatment of Chronic Dorsal Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. ISHIDA ◽  
Y. IKUTA
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

We reviewed 20 cases of chronic dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, with a mean follow-up period of 74 months. In patients without comminuted palmar fragments, open reduction and internal fixation or osteotomy of the malunited fragment provided good results. In treating patients with damaged articular cartilage or with comminuted palmar fragments by palmar plate arthroplasty, poor results were obtained because of secondary osteoarthritic changes.

Surgical Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations: A Review of Outcomes

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471987315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cory Demino ◽  
Megan Yates ◽  
John R. Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
External Fixation ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Percutaneous Fixation ◽  
Surgical Method ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

Background: Treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fracture-dislocations is difficult given the potential long-term complications of the involved finger and entire hand. Several surgical methods have been utilized for management of these injuries, none of which have shown consistently favorable results. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to report the post-operative outcomes of multiple treatment modalities for PIPJ fracture-dislocations in various studies. Methods: A literature review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all articles on PIPJ fracture-dislocations. Outcomes of interest included PIPJ range of motion, grip strength (% of contralateral hand), and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, hand (QuickDASH). Articles were distributed into 5 groups by surgical method: open reduction, percutaneous fixation, dynamic external fixation, extension-block pinning, and hemi-hamate arthroplasty. Results: Forty-eight of 1679 total screened articles were included. The weighted means of post-operative range of motion (ROM; degrees) at final follow-up were open reduction 84.7 (n = 146), percutaneous fixation 86.5 (n = 32), dynamic external fixation 81.7 (n = 389), extension-block pinning 83.6 (n = 85), and hemi-hamate arthroplasty 79.3 (n = 52). Dorsal fracture-dislocations, regardless of surgical method, had an average ROM of 83.2 (n = 321), grip strength 91% (n = 132), and QuickDASH of 6.6 (n = 59) while pilon injuries had an average ROM of 80.2 (n = 48), grip strength 100% (n = 13), and QuickDASH of 11.4 (n = 13). Conclusion: Percutaneous fixation yielded the highest post-operative ROM at final follow-up while extension-block pinning resulted in the greatest grip strength. While dorsal fracture-dislocations produced higher average ROM and lower QuickDASH score, pilon fractures produced a higher grip strength. No treatment method or fracture type yielded consistently better outcomes than another.

Chronic Fracture Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

1994 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 783-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. M. FAHMY ◽  
N. KENNY ◽  
N. KEHOE
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Phalangeal Fracture

The “S” Quattro has proved its value in the treatment of acute displaced comminuted intraarticular phalangeal fracture dislocations. We have used the system to treat five cases of chronic fracture-dislocation or subluxation of the PIP joint. At an average follow-up period of 16.4 months, there was a mean increase in the range of movement of the injured joint by 75°. We recommend this technique for selected cases.

Results of Vascularized Joint Transfers from the Foot

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. DAUTEL ◽  
M. MERLE
Keyword(s):  
Joint Space ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Indications For Surgery ◽  
Pip Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Implant ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joints ◽  
Second Toe ◽  
The Average Range

We report our results in ten cases of vascularized joint transfer to reconstruct the proximal interphalangeal joint (five cases) or metacarpophalangeal joints (five cases). Donor sites were the proximal interphalangeal or the metatarsophalangeal joints of the second toe. Indications for surgery were the need to reconstruct both the growth plate and joint space in children or the impossibility of a conventional prosthetic implant. The average range of motion was 44° for the PIP joint and 53° for the MP joint at a mean follow-up of 22.7 months.

Volar plating versus external fixation for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110593
Author(s):  
Atsuhiko Murayama ◽  
Kentaro Watanabe ◽  
Hideyuki Ota ◽  
Shigeru Kurimoto ◽  
Hitoshi Hirata
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Active Flexion ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Distal Interphalangeal

We retrospectively compared the results of volar plating and dynamic external fixation for acute unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a depressed fragment. We treated 31 patients (31 fingers), 12 with volar buttress plating and 19 with dynamic external fixation. Follow-up averaged 35 and 40 months in the two groups, with a minimal 6-month follow-up. Average active flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 95° after plate fixation and 87° after external fixation, with an active extension lag of –6° and –9°, respectively. Active flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint averaged 67° in the plate group and 58° in the external fixation group, with active extension lags of 0° and –5°, respectively. We conclude that both methods can obtain a good range of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint. A limitation of the extension of the distal interphalangeal joint occurred with dynamic external fixation but not with volar buttress plating. Level of evidence: IV

scholarly journals Therapeutic Analysis of Herbert Screw Fixation for Capitellar Fractures via the Anterior Approach in Children

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingpeng Ju ◽  
Linjun Jiang ◽  
Yuan Zhang ◽  
Jun Wu ◽  
Ming Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Index ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Anterior Approach ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Rating System ◽  
Bony Union ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
Herbert Screw ◽  
Elbow Function

Abstract Objective: To analyse the efficacy of open reduction and Herbert screw fixation for coronal fractures of the capitellum via the anterior approach in children.Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical and imaging data of 15 children with capitellar fractures who were admitted to our hospital from May 2014 to May 2019. The fracture was reduced through the cubital crease incision via the anterior approach and was internally fixated with Herbert screws. A follow-up was conducted after the operation to examine the fracture healing and elbow function. The postoperative functional recovery of patients was evaluated with the Mayo Elbow Performance index (MEPI) and the Broberg-Morrey rating system.Results: Patients underwent surgery 3.7 days after injury on average. Intraoperative fracture reduction was satisfactory. No vascular injury or nerve injury occurred. Bony union occurred in an average of 6 weeks after the operation. All children completed 12- to 36-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, the Mayo Elbow Performance index was considered excellent in 12 patients and good in three patients. The Broberg-Morrey score was considered excellent in 12 patients, good in two patients, and fair in one patient. Conclusion: Open reduction and Herbert screw fixation via the anterior approach are an ideal surgical method for the treatment of coronal fractures of the capitellum in children.Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, retrospective study-Level IV

Fractures and Fracture Dislocations of the Midfoot: Occurrence, Causes and Long-term Results

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martinus Richter ◽  
Burkhard Wippermann ◽  
Christian Krettek ◽  
Hanns Eberhard Schratt ◽  
Tobias Hufner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
Traffic Accidents ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Treatment Optimization ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Fracture Dislocations

Etiology and outcome of 155 patients with midfoot fractures between 1972 and 1997 were analyzed to create a basis for treatment optimization. Cause of injuries were traffic accidents (72.2%), falls (11.6%), blunt injuries (7.7%) and others (5.8%). Isolated midfoot fractures (I) were found in 55 (35.5%) cases, Lisfranc fracture dislocations (L) in 49 (31.2%), Chopart-Lisfranc fracture dislocations (CL) in 26 (16.8%) and Chopart fracture dislocations (C) in 25 (16%). One hundred and forty eight (95%) of the midfoot fractures were treated operatively; 30 with closed reduction, 115 with open reduction, 3 patients had a primary amputation. Seven (5%) patients were treated non-operatively. Ninety seven (63%) patients had follow-up at an average of 9 (1.3–25, median 8.5) years. The average scores of the entire follow-up group were as follows: AOFAS – sum of all four sections (AOFAS-ET): 296, AOFAS-Midfoot (AOFAS-M): 71, Hannover Scoring System (HSS): 65, and Hannover Questionnaire (Q): 63. Regarding age, gender, cause, time from injury to treatment and method of treatment no score differences were noted (t-test: p > 0.05). L, C or I showed similar scores and CL significantly lower scores (AOFAS-ET, AOFAS-M, HSS, Q). The highest scores in all groups were achieved in those fractures treated with early open reduction and operative fixation. Midfoot fractures, particularly fracture dislocation injuries, effect the function of the entire foot in the long-term outcome. But even in these complex injuries, an early anatomic (open) reduction and stable (internal) fixation can minimize the percentage of long-term impairment.

Extension-Block Pinning for Unstable Dorsal Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations: A Simple, Percutaneous Technique With Reproducible Outcomes

Hand ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 155894472110663
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Worgul ◽  
Andrew B. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Kirschner Wire ◽  
Proximal Phalanx ◽  
Treatment Delay ◽  
Joint Fracture ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Pip Joint

Background: Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture-dislocations can be technically challenging injuries to treat, and no technique has proven to be superior nor lead to predictably good outcomes. We describe our experience of treating unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint with extension-block pinning (EBP) at our institution over a 22-year period. Methods: In all, 23 patients with 24 unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint treated with EBP between January 1998 and October 2020 were identified. All patients underwent closed reduction of the PIP joint and insertion of a Kirschner wire into the proximal phalanx, creating a mechanical block. Range of motion and joint congruity were assessed at final clinic follow-up. Long-term function was assessed via completion of a Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was utilized to assess if any association existed between treatment delay, pin-in-body days, or amount of articular surface involved and QuickDASH score. Results: Mean range of motion at final follow-up was 83.3° and 22 of 24 PIP joints demonstrated a congruent reduction. In all, 15 of the 23 patients completed the QuickDASH questionnaire at a median long-term follow-up of 57.5 months (range: 3-157 months). Average QuickDASH score was 18.8, indicating minimal long-term disability. No statistically significant associations were found between treatment delay, pin-in-body days, or amount of articular surface involved and QuickDASH score. Conclusions: EBP offers a simple and innovative method to treat a complex injury of the PIP joint. It is technically straightforward and cheap, and produces excellent functional outcomes with minimal long-term disability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document