scholarly journals The real-world prevalence of cardiovascular events related to coronary spasm after percutaneous coronary intervention

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Seiji Hokimoto ◽  
Noriaki Tabata ◽  
Daisuke Sueta ◽  
Tomonori Akasaka ◽  
Kenichi Tsujita ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru Liu ◽  
Tianyu Li ◽  
Deshan Yuan ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Xiaofang Tang ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: This study analyzed the association between on-treatment platelet reactivity and long-term outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and thrombocytopenia (TP) in the real world. Methods: A total of 10724 consecutive cases with coronary artery disease who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were collected from January to December 2013. Cases with ACS and TP under dual anti-platelet therapy were enrolled from the total cohort. 5-year clinical outcomes were evaluated among cases with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR), low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) and normal on-treatment platelet reactivity (NTPR), tested by thromboelastogram (TEG) at baseline. Results: Cases with HTPR, LTPR and NTPR accounted for 26.2%, 34.4% and 39.5%, respectively. Cases with HTPR were presented with the most male sex, lowest hemoglobin level, highest erythrocyte sedimentation rate and most LM or three-vessel disease, compared with the other two groups. The rates of 5-year all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stroke and bleeding were all not significantly different among three groups. Multivariable Cox regression indicated that, compared with cases with NTPR, cases with HTPR were not independently associated with all endpoints, as well as cases with LTPR (all P>0.05). Conclusions: In patients with ACS and TP undergoing PCI, 5-year all-cause death, MACCE, MI, revascularization, stroke and bleeding risk were all similar between cases with HTPR and cases with NTPR, tested by TEG at baseline, in the real world. The comparison result was the same between cases with LTPR and NTPR.


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Domingo Cascón-Pérez ◽  
José Abellán-Huerta ◽  
José Antonio Giner-Caro ◽  
Derek Farid Dau-Villareal ◽  
Rosario Mármol-Lozano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyotaka Hao ◽  
Jun Takahashi ◽  
Yoku Kikuchi ◽  
Akira Suda ◽  
Koichi Sato ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Stable coronary artery disease is caused by a variable combination of organic coronary stenosis and functional coronary abnormalities, such as coronary artery spasm. Thus, we examined the clinical importance of comorbid significant coronary stenosis and coronary spasm. METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled 236 consecutive patients with suspected angina who underwent acetylcholine provocation testing for coronary spasm and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. Among them, 175 patients were diagnosed as having vasospastic angina (VSA), whereas the remaining 61 had no VSA (non‐VSA group). The patients with VSA were further divided into the following 3 groups based on angiography and FFR: no organic stenosis (≤50% luminal stenosis; VSA‐alone group, n=110), insignificant stenosis of FFR>0.80 (high‐FFR group, n=36), and significant stenosis of FFR≤0.80 (low‐FFR group, n=29). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent percutaneous coronary intervention, and hospitalization attributed to unstable angina was evaluated. All patients with VSA received calcium channel blockers, and 28 patients (95%) in the low‐FFR group underwent a planned percutaneous coronary intervention. During a median follow‐up period of 656 days, although the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was low and comparable among non‐VSA, VSA‐alone, and high‐FFR groups, the low‐FFR group had an extremely poor prognosis (non‐VSA group, 1.6%; VSA‐alone group, 3.6%; high‐FFR group, 5.6%; low‐FFR group, 27.6%) ( P <0.001). Importantly, all 8 patients with major adverse cardiovascular events in the low‐FFR group were appropriately treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and calcium channel blockers. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that patients with VSA with significant coronary stenosis represent a high‐risk population despite current guideline‐recommended therapies, suggesting the importance of routine coronary functional testing in this population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document