scholarly journals The association between subcontractor safety management programs and worker perceived safety climate in commercial construction projects

2020 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 279-288
Author(s):  
Ann Marie Dale ◽  
Ryan Colvin ◽  
Marco Barrera ◽  
Jaime R. Strickland ◽  
Bradley A. Evanoff
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1188-1209 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Oswald ◽  
Rita Peihua Zhang ◽  
Helen Lingard ◽  
Payam Pirzadeh ◽  
Tiendung Le

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a critical review of the use of safety performance indicators in the construction industry. The authors consider the strengths, limitations and managerial consequences associated with commonly used indicators. Design/methodology/approach The authors combine two separate data sets in this critical review. These include 32 semi-structured interviews with construction industry representatives involved in the collection and reporting of safety indicators, as well as a multi-level safety climate survey that was conducted at 12 construction sites across Australia. Findings The analysis provides new evidence that, in their current use, commonly used H&S indicators are subject to manipulation and misinterpretation. Their usefulness as tools to support safety management activities in construction projects and organisations needs to be understood in the context of their limitations. In particular, safety indicators do not reflect the full set of factors that affect workplace safety and there will always be disagreement about what should be counted and how. Originality/value As a result of the substantial shortcomings of safety indicators, great care needs to be taken when using them to determine or evaluate organisational safety policy and practices.


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A79.3-A80
Author(s):  
Ann Marie Dale ◽  
Skye Buckner-Petty ◽  
Bradley Evanoff

BackgroundLeading indicators are preferred to identify injuries and fatalities in construction industry. Safety climate is a leading indicator of construction injuries yet it is not known how workers’ safety climate scores relate to safety programs of different maturity levels.MethodsThis study examined the relationship between safety program scores based on documents and contractor reported activities and project leading indicators of contractor safety climate, safety behaviors of workers and crews, and safety attitudes of coworkers from employee surveys. Hierarchical linear regression models accounted for contractor size and number of workers, nested in contractors within projects. Separate models examined the relationships between safety program scores and 1) contractor safety climate; 2) coworker attitude scores, 3) employees’ own behavior score, and 4) crew behavior scores.Results446 employees of 40 contractors from three commercial construction projects participated. Many contractors (n=16) had good safety programs with 15 or more safety activities (out of 17) from organizational management, worker participation, hazard identification, and training domains. Stronger safety programs had higher safety climate scores (5.15 point difference on a 100 point scale, p=0.05), better coworker safety attitudes (6.69 points, p=0.01), better crew safety behaviors (5.34 points, p=0.02) and higher self-rated behaviors (5.14 points, p=0.02) compared to safety programs with fewer safety items.ConclusionsContractors with more comprehensive safety programs were perceived to have stronger safety climate. Better safety programs were also associated with better self-reported safety performance of coworkers, crews, and individual workers. Stronger safety programs incorporated activities from all four domains Safety programs that include activities that cover safety of management and worker influence safety performance and safety climate as perceived by the workers.


Author(s):  
Ran Gao ◽  
Albert P. C. Chan ◽  
Wahyudi P. Utama ◽  
Hafiz Zahoor

The construction industry is deemed to be one of the most dangerous industries worldwide due to its special characteristics of production process. Globalization has brought about an increasing number of construction companies involving themselves in the international construction market. Due to involvement of participants from different countries and regions, international construction projects possess complexities from national, organizational and individual perspectives which may affect construction safety management adversely and lead to unsatisfactory safety performance. Safety climate, defined as “a unified set of cognitions regarding the safety aspects of the organization”, is often considered to be a predictor of safety behavior and performance. After conducting a comprehensive review of existing literature related to safety climate measurement in construction sector, this study highlights several conditions for selecting suitable safety climate instruments specific in international construction projects.


2020 ◽  
pp. 41-51
Author(s):  
Pavel Kurochkin

Pavel Kurochkin, manager of labor protection, industrial safety and ecology at NIPIGAS company, talks about the realization of the NIPIGAS project for the construction of the Amur gas processing plant for LLC Gazprom pererabotka Blagoveshchensk and about the design and implementation of preparatory works for the construction of the Amur gas-chemical plant for LLC SIBUR. New approaches to labor protection and safety, which are used at NIPIGAZ construction sites, make it possible to control the safety of work at heights and in inaccessible places and to monitor construction and installation works using video surveillance technologies and video analytics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Palupi Restuputri ◽  
M Syahban Giraldi ◽  
Shanty Kusuma Dewi ◽  
Ilyas Masudin ◽  
Uci Yuliati

This article aims to measure the application of occupational safety and health using Cooper's Reciprocal Safety Culture Model and Confirmatory Factor Analysis method.  The objective function of this article is to find out the aspects of safety culture that have been implemented by companies. A questionnaire was circulated to staff on the company's production floor as part of this study. The results of the questionnaire recapitulation were then analyzed using the confirmatory factor analysis method. Based on the score calculation results and the category determination build on the questionnaire scores on each dimension of the safety culture applied to the Steel Company, the safety climate value of 55.58 is obtained, which is on a 'quite good' scale. The safety behaviour value of 44, 89 is included on a 'quite good' scale, the safety management system value of 22.04 is on a 'poor' scale, and the safety culture value of 40.83 is on the 'quite good' scale. With these results, it is essential to make improvements to the safety culture in the company, especially in the dimensions of the safety management system, which is on the 'quite good' scale.


2019 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole S.N. Yiu ◽  
Daniel W.M. Chan ◽  
Ming Shan ◽  
N.N. Sze

2019 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 48-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ng Khean Kim ◽  
Noor Fareen Abdul Rahim ◽  
Mohammad Iranmanesh ◽  
Behzad Foroughi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document