Prospective Comparison of Cumulative Sum versus Objective Evaluation for Endoscopic Training

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 541
Author(s):  
Y. Hu ◽  
J. Jolissaint ◽  
A.G. Ramirez ◽  
C. Tache-Leon ◽  
Z. Yang ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 192 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinin Hu ◽  
Joshua S. Jolissaint ◽  
Adriana Ramirez ◽  
Ryan Gordon ◽  
Zequan Yang ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew McIvor ◽  
Diane Flood ◽  
Leslie Lee-Pack ◽  
Anita Rachlis ◽  
Philip Berger ◽  
...  

Objective: To report patient acceptability and overall therapeutic effectiveness of two different ultrasonic nebulizers, Fisoneb and Porta-sonic, for the administration of aerosol pentamidine forPneumocysitis cariniiprophylaxis in human immunodeficiency virus (hiv)-infected individuals.Design: Prospective assessment of a random subgroup of 174 individuals from an inception cohort of 1093 patients attending a central aerosol pentamidine treatment centre in Toronto, Ontario.Methods: One hundred and seventy-four patients who had been receiving aerosolized pentamidine for more than 10 weeks using Fisoneb at 60 mg every two weeks were switched to Porta-sonic. Subjective evaluation included three standard 10 cm visual analogue scales rating cough/wheeze, aftertaste and overall preference. The individuals were also asked to compare the duration of time spent on the aerosol treatments. Objective evaluation included spirometry performed immediately before and 15 mins after pentamidine administration. Prospective surveillance of the entire cohort was preformed to record and document episodes of breakthroughP cariniipneumonia.Results: Porta-sonic was the overall preferred nebulizer in 82% of patients. Less time was spent on aerosol treatment using the Porta-sonic nebulizer compared with the Fisoneb in 66% of patients. The Porta-sonic nebulizer system produced less aftertaste compared with Fisoneb. Both nebulizers produced significant but modest reduction in flow rates. During the study period there was no statistically significant difference in the rates of breakthroughP cariniipneumonia between the two groups. A total of 91 episodes occurred, at a rate of 0.5 episodes per patient-month on Porta-sonic compared with 0.7 episodes per patient-month on Fisoneb (P=0.2536).Discussion: Aerosol pentamidine remains the proven second-line prophylaxis againstP cariniipneumonia inhiv/aidsfor those intolerant to trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole. Cough, bronchospasm and poor taste are side effects that may limit patient tolerance and acceptability. The results of this study show that the Porta-sonic nebulizer system significantly reduces some of these side effects and increases patient preference.Conclusion: This study suggests that Porta-sonic, the newer nebulizer system, with more ideal in vitro characteristics may become a favoured device in clinical practice.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Schulte ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
J. Stuart Wolf ◽  
James E. Montie ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bürger ◽  
Meyer ◽  
Tautenhahn ◽  
Halloul

Background: Objective evaluation of the management of patients with ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm in emergency situations has been described rarely. Patients and methods: Fifty-two consecutive patients with ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm (mean age, 70.3 years; range, 56–89 years; SD 7.8) were admitted between January 1993 and March 1998. Emergency protocols, final reports, and follow-up data were analyzed retrospectively. APACHE II scores at admission and fifth postoperative day were assessed. Results: The time between the appearance of first symptoms and the referral of patients to the hospital was more than 5 hours in 37 patients (71%). Thirty-eight patients (71%) had signs of shock at time of admission. Ultrasound was performed in 81% of patients as the first diagnostic procedure. The most frequent site of aortic rupture was the left retroperitoneum (87%). Intraoperatively, acute left ventricular failure occurred in four patients, and cardiac arrest in two others. The postoperative course was complicated significantly in 34 patients. The overall mortality rate was 36.5% (n = 19). In 35 patients, APACHE II score was assessed, showing a probability of death of more than 40% in five patients and lower than 30% in 17 others. No patient showing probability of death of above 75% at the fifth postoperative day survived (n = 7). Conclusions: Ruptured aortic aneurysm demands surgical intervention. Clinical outcome is also influenced by preclinical and anesthetic management. The severity of disease as well as the patient’s prognosis can be approximated using APACHE II score. Treatment results of heterogenous patient groups can be compared.


The Lancet ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 365 (9456) ◽  
pp. 305-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
D ROCKEY ◽  
E PAULSON ◽  
D NIEDZWIECKI ◽  
W DAVIS ◽  
H BOSWORTH ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document