AbstractThe stress-induced mutagenesis paradigm postulates that in response to stress, bacteria increase their genome-wide mutation rate, in turn increasing the chances that a descendant is able to withstand the stress. This has implications for antibiotic treatment: exposure to sub-inhibitory doses of antibiotics has been reported to increase bacterial mutation rates, and thus probably the rate at which resistance mutations appear and lead to treatment failure.Measuring mutation rates under stress, however, is problematic, because existing methods assume there is no death. Yet sub-inhibitory stress levels may induce a substantial death rate. Death events need to be compensated by extra replication to reach a given population size, thus giving more opportunities to acquire mutations. We show that ignoring death leads to a systematic overestimation of mutation rates under stress.We developed a system using plasmid segregation to measure death and growth rates simultaneously in bacterial populations. We use it to replicate classical experiments reporting antibiotic-induced mutagenesis. We found that a substantial death rate occurs at the tested sub-inhibitory concentrations, and taking this death into account lowers and sometimes removes the signal for stress-induced mutagenesis. Moreover even when antibiotics increase mutation rate, sub-inhibitory treatments do not increase genetic diversity and evolvability, again because of effects of the antibiotics on population dynamics.Beside showing that population dynamic is a crucial but neglected parameter affecting evolvability, we provide better experimental and computational tools to study evolvability under stress, leading to a re-assessment of the magnitude and significance of the stress-induced mutagenesis paradigm.
An alternative derivation of the stationary distribution of the multivariate neutral Wright–Fisher model for low mutation rates with a view to mutation rate estimation from site frequency data