Genetic structure and molecular variability of Grapevine fanleaf virus populations

2010 ◽  
Vol 152 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 30-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.E. Oliver ◽  
E. Vigne ◽  
M. Fuchs
Agriculture ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 496
Author(s):  
Stefano Panno ◽  
Andrea Giovanni Caruso ◽  
Sofia Bertacca ◽  
Antonino Pisciotta ◽  
Rosario Di Lorenzo ◽  
...  

Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) is one of the main causes of grapevine fanleaf degeneration disease (GFDD) and is present in almost all areas where grapevine is cultivated. In this work, we ascertained the presence and spread of GFLV in different commercial vineyards in four Sicilian provinces (Italy), and its genetic structure and molecular variability were studied. In detail, a total of 617 grapevine samples of 11 autochthonous grapevine cultivars were collected in 20 commercial vineyards. Preliminary screening by serological (DAS-ELISA) and molecular (RT-PCR) analyses for ArMV (arabis mosaic virus) and GFLV detection were conducted. Results obtained showed the absence of ArMV in all the samples analyzed, while 48 out of 617 samples gave positive results to GFLV, for a total of 9 out of 11 cultivars analyzed. Phylogenetic analyses carried out on the GFLV-CP gene of 18 Sicilian GFLV sequences selected in this study showed a certain degree of variability among the Sicilian isolates, suggesting a different origin, probably as a consequence of the continuous interchange of GFLV-infected propagating material with other Italian regions or viticultural areas located in other countries.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e96582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahideh Nouri ◽  
Rafael Arevalo ◽  
Bryce W. Falk ◽  
Russell L. Groves

2018 ◽  
Vol 365 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Delia Patricia Parrilla-Taylor ◽  
Norberto Vibanco-Pérez ◽  
Maria de Jesús Durán-Avelar ◽  
Bruno Gomez-Gil ◽  
Raúl Llera-Herrera ◽  
...  

Viruses ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilyn Matsumura ◽  
Helvécio Coletta Filho ◽  
Silvia de Oliveira Dorta ◽  
Shahideh Nouri ◽  
Marcos Machado

2012 ◽  
Vol 298 (10) ◽  
pp. 1917-1929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrshad Zeinalabedini ◽  
Samira Sohrabi ◽  
Kianoush Nikoumanesh ◽  
Ali Imani ◽  
Mohsen Mardi

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e0121260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Palma ◽  
Kevin Maebe ◽  
Jerson Vanderlei Carús Guedes ◽  
Guy Smagghe

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Pipan ◽  
Vladimir Meglič

Abstract Background Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important food legume for direct human consumption around the world, as it represents a valuable source of components with nutritional and health benefits. Results We conducted a study to define and explain the genetic relatedness and diversification level of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) germplasm from Portugal to Ukraine, along a western-to-eastern line of southern European countries, including Poland. This was based on the P. vulgaris genetic structure, and was designed to better describe its distribution and domestication pathways in Europe. Using the multi-crop passport descriptors that include geographic origin and different phaseolin types (corresponding to the Mesoamerican and Andean gene pools), 782 accessions were obtained from nine gene banks and 12 geographic origins. We selected 33 genome/ gene-related/ gene-pool-related nuclear simple sequence repeat markers that covered the genetic diversity across the P. vulgaris genome. The overall polymorphic information content was 0.800. Without specifying geographic origin, global structure cluster analysis generated 10 genetic clusters. Among the PvSHP1 markers, the most informative for gene pool assignment of the European P. vulgaris germplasm was PvSHP1-B. Results of AMOVA show that 89% of the molecular variability is shared within the 782 accessions, with 4% molecular variability among the different geographic origins along this western-to-eastern line of southern Europe (including Poland). Conclusions This study shows that the diversification line of the European P. vulgaris germplasm followed from the western areas of southern Europe (Portugal, Spain, Italy, Slovenia) to the more eastern areas of southern Europe. This progression defines three geographically separated subgroups, as the northern (Poland, Ukraine, Romania), southern (Albania, Bulgaria), and central (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Hungary) areas of eastern Europe.


2014 ◽  
Vol 159 (8) ◽  
pp. 2081-2090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Tabasinejad ◽  
Behrooz Jafarpour ◽  
Mohammad Zakiaghl ◽  
Majid Siampour ◽  
Hamid Rouhani ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 144 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 154-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Vigne ◽  
Aurélie Marmonier ◽  
Véronique Komar ◽  
Olivier Lemaire ◽  
Marc Fuchs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document