Effect of Stereotactic Radiosurgery on Residual or Relapsed Pituitary Adenoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 374-381.e4
Author(s):  
Lindolfo Carlos Heringer ◽  
Maíra Machado de Lima ◽  
José Marcus Rotta ◽  
Ricardo Vieira Botelho
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiulin Zheng ◽  
Yinqiong Huang ◽  
Wei Lin ◽  
Liangchun Cai ◽  
Junping Wen ◽  
...  

Context: Radiotherapy for patients with acromegaly was considered when patients have residual disease or tumor recurrence after surgery, or when surgery can’t be carried out. There are two main modes of radiotherapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to present the effectiveness and safety of SRS and FSRT for GH secreting pituitary adenoma in clinical practice. Methods: We searched the published literature using following databases: Pub Med, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and EMBASE up to March 22, 2020, for studies in which SRS or FSRT were used in patients with GH secreting pituitary. Results: A total of 33 studies were eligible, involving 2016 participants. No significant differences were observed in tumor shrinkage rate, local tumor control rate and adverse effect rate between SRS and FSRT. Compared to FSRT, SRS showed significant increase in biochemical remission rate (43% vs. 28%; p=0.023) and significant lower follow-up GH level (SMD: −1.20 vs. −0.37, p=0.006). Conclusions: SRS and FSRT showed comparable effectiveness and safety in the management of GH secreting pituitary adenoma patients. SRS might be associated with better biochemical remission.


2011 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Guanghai Mei ◽  
Xiaoxia Liu ◽  
Jiazhong Dai ◽  
Li Pan ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 982-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Yu Lu ◽  
Hui Sun ◽  
Jian-Guo Xu ◽  
Qiao-Yu Li

Object Over the last two decades, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has arisen as a promising approach in the management of brainstem cavernous malformations (CMs). In the present study, the authors report a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available published data regarding the radiosurgical management of brainstem CMs. Methods To identify eligible studies, systematic searches for brainstem CMs treated with SRS were conducted in major scientific publication databases. The search yielded 5 studies, which were included in the meta-analysis. Data from 178 patients with brainstem CMs were extracted. Hemorrhage rates before and after SRS were calculated, a meta-analysis was performed, and the risk ratio (RR) was determined. Results Four studies showed a statically significant reduction in the annual hemorrhage rate after SRS. The overall RR was 0.161 (95% CI 0.052–0.493; p = 0.001), and 21 patients (11.8%) had transient or permanent neurological deficits. Conclusions The present meta-analysis for the radiosurgical management of brainstem CMs shows that SRS can decrease the rate of repeat hemorrhage and has a low rate of adverse effects compared with surgery. The authors suggest that SRS may be considered as an alternative treatment for brainstem CMs that are inoperable or have a high operative risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document