Percutaneous drainage in emphysematous pyelonephritis — an alternative to major surgery

1988 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 622-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R.W. Hall ◽  
R.G. Choa ◽  
I.P. Wells
2007 ◽  
Vol 68 (07) ◽  
pp. 42-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.-W. Chuang ◽  
C.-H. Chen ◽  
C.-H. Cheng ◽  
S.-W. Hung ◽  
T.M. Yu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Taiji Nishimura ◽  
Teruhide Watanabe ◽  
Yasuyuki Morikawa ◽  
Chorsu Lee ◽  
Yoshio Ichinose ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-94
Author(s):  
Mohammad Ali Zulkifl ◽  
Mir Rasekh Alam

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a serious and often life threatening infection of the renal and perirenal tissues. The characteristic feature of this infection is the presence of gas within the kidney and perinephric tissues. EPN usually occurs in diabetic women. CT Scan is the investigation of choice not only to establish the diagnosis but also to plan the line of management. Renal preservation must be the aim of management. This can be achieved to a great extent by medical management combined with percutaneous drainage of obstructed kidney. However nephrectomy is indicated in life threatening infection of the kidney. Prompt diagnosis and the timing of drainage could be the prognostic factor. A case of EPN in a diabetic patient who was successfully managed by nephrectomy is presented.J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2015; 33(2): 91-94


2008 ◽  
Vol 179 (5) ◽  
pp. 1844-1849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhaskar K. Somani ◽  
Ghulam Nabi ◽  
Peter Thorpe ◽  
Jeff Hussey ◽  
Jonathan Cook ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mohammed Al-Saraf ◽  
Salim Al-Busaidy ◽  
Kurian George ◽  
Mohamed Elawdy ◽  
Issa Al-Salmi

Objectives: Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) has high mortality rates reaching 50%, however later studies have reported significantly lower mortality rates ranging from 0 to 37.5%. Renal percutaneous drainage techniques have reduced the mortality and the necessity for surgery.  Nevertheless, the same studies have reported a wide diversity in the usage of percutaneous drainage (PCD) and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) techniques. Methods: A retrospective study of 17 patients was conducted over a 10year period, from January 2008 to December 2017. All patients had undergone abdominal computerized tomography, these were reviewed and categorized according to Huang and Tseng’s classification. Results: 13 patients (76%) were categorized as class I and II, 3 (17%) as class IIIA, and 1 (6%) as class IIIB. Five patients from the class I & II categories underwent drainage of the pelvicalyceal system, 4 by PCN and 1 by Double J Stent (DJS) insertion. All the class IIIA and IIIB patients had PCN inserted. One class IIIB patient required PCD for localized gas and fluid collection but later underwent emergency nephrectomy. There were no mortalities. Conclusion: The favourable outcome of this study is in keeping with the more recent studies. However, despite the present classifications and guidelines, wide variations are reported in the use of percutaneous drains with PCD ranging from 2.5 – 91%. The lack of precise guidelines may be a cause of these disparities in the clinical management.Keywords: emphysematous, pyelonephritis, drainage, percutaneous, nephrostomy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document