scholarly journals Laparoscopic Versus Open Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: Is There a Short-Term Advantage in Complication Rates With a Minimally Invasive Approach?

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-1003-S-1004
Author(s):  
David B. Stewart ◽  
Christopher S. Hollenbeak ◽  
Melissa M. Boltz
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Abdominoperineal Resection ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Invasive Approach

The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (7) ◽  
pp. 811-818
Author(s):  
Salvatore A. Parascandola ◽  
Salini Hota ◽  
Mayou Martin T. Tampo ◽  
Andrew D. Sparks ◽  
Vincent Obias
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Population Database ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Positive Margins ◽  
The Impact

Background Data regarding the effect of conversion from minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to laparotomy in rectal cancer is limited. This study examines the impact of conversion from laparoscopic or robotic-assisted techniques to open resection on oncologic outcomes in a large population database. Methods The National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2016 was reviewed for all cases of invasive adenocarcinoma of the rectum or rectosigmoid junction managed surgically. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts by approach: laparoscopic/robotic (MIS), converted proctectomy (CP), and open proctectomy (OP). Kaplan–Meier estimation was used for unadjusted survival analysis, followed by adjusted multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazards regression. Secondary outcomes were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. Results The inclusion criteria identified 57 574 patients cases of adenocarcinoma of the rectum managed surgically. Of these patients, 23 579 (41.0%) underwent MIS, 3591 (6.2%) CP, and 30 404 (52.8%) OP. Five-year overall survival was greater in the MIS (70.4%) versus CP and OP (64.4% and 61.4%). No differences were detected for positive margins, 30-day, or 90-day mortality between CP and OP. MIS and CP approaches were significantly associated with increased odds of 12 or more regional lymph nodes examined and decreased overall mortality hazard compared with OP (all respective significant P < .05). Discussion While similar odds of positive margins and short-term mortality is seen in patients whose procedure converts to laparotomy compared with planned laparotomy, both short-term and long-term oncologic benefit is seen in those who undergo a minimally invasive approach. Thus, a minimally invasive approach should be attempted for patients with rectal cancer.

Minimally Invasive Surgery of Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Options

2012 ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga ◽  
Martin R. Weiser
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Invasive Approach

Overview: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) of colorectal cancer has become more popular in the past two decades. Laparoscopic colectomy has been accepted as an alternative standard approach in colon cancer, with comparable oncologic outcomes and several better short-term outcomes compared to open surgery. Unlike the treatment for colon cancer, however, the minimally invasive approach in rectal cancer has not been established. In this article, we summarize the current status of MIS for rectal cancer and explore the various technical options.

scholarly journals Calcaneal fractures: a management dilemma-minimally invasive approach for intra and extra articular calcaneal fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 756
Author(s):  
Kawade M. S. ◽  
Madan H. S. ◽  
Shailesh Khachane ◽  
Manjeet Singh Dhanda
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Ct Reconstruction ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Calcaneal Fractures ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Minimally Invasive Methods

Background: Calcaneal fractures which constitutes 2% of total fractures are frequent and very debilitating if not treated properly. Calcaneal fractures generally affect younger population leading to significant man-days loss(around 2-5 years3) and in-turn leading significant economic burden on the society. The goal of treatment for calcaneal fractures is elimination of pain and restoration of normal foot shape, biomechanics, and walking ability. Wound related complications are common with open surgeries. After open reduction internal fixation with perimeter plates for displaced calcaneal fractures, wound edge necrosis is commonly observed with the extended lateral approach. Because of such high incidence of wound complications in open reduction of calcaneum fractures, minimally invasive approach takes priority over open reduction of these fractures.Methods: The study aimed to evaluate the results of minimally invasive approach for calcaneal fractures. To reduce the operative complications, 30 patients were treated with minimally invasive methods in both extra articular and intra-articular calcaneal fractures and the results were evaluated. All patients were evaluated clinically , functionally and radiologically 3D- CT reconstruction images.Results: All cases were followed up for 2 years at specified intervals. The outcome measures were evaluated by AOFAS scores10 with excellent result in 13 cases and good to fair results in the rest. Operated patients had no wound infection, no skin necrosis, 5 patients had mild subtalar arthrosis and 3 patients complained slight difficulty in wearing shoes. None of them have any gait abnormalities.Conclusions: Our study suggests that the minimally invasive methods will reduce the operative complication rates. The minimally invasive surgical intervention in an expert hand can yield better results with less complication rates.

Minimally Invasive Lateral Retropleural Thoracolumbar Approach: Cadaveric Feasibility Study and Report of 4 Clinical Cases

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons32-ons39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan S. Uribe ◽  
Elias Dakwar ◽  
Rafael F. Cardona ◽  
Fernando L. Vale
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Early Experience ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Lateral Aspect ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Vertebral Bodies ◽  
Clinical Cases

Abstract BACKGROUND: Traditional anterior and posterior approaches to the thoracolumbar spine are associated with significant morbidity. In an effort to eliminate these drawbacks, minimally invasive retropleural approaches have been developed. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility and clinical experience of a minimally invasive lateral retropleural approach to the thoracolumbar spine. METHODS: Seven cadaveric dissections were performed in 7 fresh specimens to determine the feasibility of the technique. In each specimen, the lateral aspect of the vertebral body was accessed retropleurally, and a corpectomy was performed. Intraprocedural fluoroscopy and postoperative computed tomography were used to assess the extent of decompression. As an adjunct, 3 clinical cases of thoracic fractures and 1 neurofibroma were treated with this minimally invasive approach. Operative results, complications, and early outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: In the cadaveric study, adequate exposure was obtained to perform a lateral corpectomy and to allow interbody grafting between the adjacent vertebral bodies. The procedures were successfully performed in the 4 clinical cases without conversion to conventional approaches. A pleural tear was noted in the first clinical case, and a chest tube was placed without any long-term sequelae. CONCLUSION: Our early experience suggests that the minimally invasive lateral retropleural approach allows adequate vertebrectomy and canal decompression without the tissue disruption associated with posterolateral approaches. This approach may improve the complication rates that accompany open or endoscopic approaches for thoracolumbar corpectomies.

MINIMALLY INVASIVE POSTEROLATERAL THORACIC CORPECTOMY

Neurosurgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 746-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Hyun Kim ◽  
John E. O'Toole ◽  
Alfred T. Ogden ◽  
Kurt M. Eichholz ◽  
John Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Burst Fracture ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Tubular Retractor ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Vertebral Bodies ◽  
Clinical Cases

Abstract OBJECTIVE To demonstrate the feasibility of and initial clinical experience with a novel minimally invasive posterolateral thoracic corpectomy technique. METHODS Seven procedures were performed on 6 cadavers to determine the feasibility of thoracic corpectomy using a minimally invasive approach. The posterolateral thoracic corpectomies were performed with expandable 22 mm diameter tubular retractor paramedian incisions. The posterolateral aspects of the vertebral bodies were accessed extrapleurally, and complete corpectomies were performed. Intraprocedural fluoroscopy and postoperative computed tomography were used to assess the degree of decompression. In addition, 2 clinical cases of T6 burst fracture, 1 T4–T5 plasmacytoma, and 1 T12 colon cancer metastasis were treated using this minimally invasive approach. RESULTS In the cadaveric study, an average of 93% of the ventral canal and 80% of the corresponding vertebral body were removed. The pleura and intrathoracic contents were not violated. Adequate exposure was obtained to allow interbody grafting between the adjacent vertebral bodies. The procedures were successfully performed in the 4 clinical cases using a minimally invasive technique, and the patients demonstrated good outcomes. CONCLUSION Based on this study, minimally invasive posterolateral thoracic corpectomy safely and successfully allows complete spinal canal decompression without the tissue disruption associated with open thoracotomy. This approach may improve the complication rates that accompany open or even thoracoscopic approaches for thoracic corpectomy and may even allow surgical intervention in patients with significant comorbidities.

Surgical outcomes of hysterectomy for endometriosis: Benefits of a minimally invasive approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 228402652098571
Author(s):  
Olga Mutter ◽  
Sarah Ackroyd ◽  
George A Taylor ◽  
Juan Diaz
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Surgical Outcomes ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Pelvic Surgery ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Abdominal Approach

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate surgical outcomes of hysterectomy for endometriosis performed by general obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) based on surgical approach. Methods: Using the 2016–2018 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we examined surgical outcomes including 30-day complication rates based on surgical approach in patients who underwent a hysterectomy for endometriosis by OB/GYNs. Results: From 2016 to 2018, 3641 hysterectomies were performed by OB/GYNs for endometriosis. 86.0% were performed via a minimally invasive (MIS) approach, with 2882 (79.2%) via a laparoscopic and 247 (6.8%) via a vaginal approach. Compared to MIS hysterectomies, those who underwent an abdominal hysterectomy included a higher proportion of African American and a lower proportion of non-Hispanic white patients, had heavier uteri, lower parity, and were more likely obese (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, comorbidities other than obesity, or a history of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery (all p > 0.05). Women undergoing hysterectomy for endometriosis experienced an overall 9.8% complication rate. Compared to abdominal approaches, MIS had a lower rate of overall complications (8.5% vs 17.8%) including wound (2.7% vs 7.2%) and major (4.4% vs 8.8%) complications (all p < 0.001). MIS had shorter operative time (129.2 ± 60.9 vs 143.8 ± 71.9), shorter length of stay (0.9 ± 1.6 vs 2.4 ± 1.8), and fewer readmissions (2.8% vs 5.5%) (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: While hysterectomy for endometriosis is a challenging procedure to perform, OB/GYNs are performing this procedure predominantly via a minimally invasive approach with fewer complications and more favorable surgical outcomes than an abdominal approach.

scholarly journals A Single Centre Retrospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Rectal Resection with TME for Rectal Cancer: 5-Year Cancer-Specific Survival

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Raoul Quarati ◽  
Massimo Summa ◽  
Fabio Priora ◽  
Valeria Maglione ◽  
Ferruccio Ravazzoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Minimally Invasive Approach ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Anterior Rectal Resection

Laparoscopic colon resection has established its role as a minimally invasive approach to colorectal diseases. Better long-term survival rate is suggested to be achievable with this approach in colon cancer patients, whereas some doubts were raised about its safety in rectal cancer. Here we report on our single centre experience of rectal laparoscopic resections for cancer focusing on short- and long-term oncological outcomes. In the last 13 years, 248 patients underwent minimally invasive approach for rectal cancer at our centre. We focused on 99 stage I, II, and III patients with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. Of them 43 had a middle and 56 lower rectal tumor. Laparoscopic anterior rectal resection was performed in 71 patients whereas laparoscopic abdomino-perineal resection in 28. The overall mortality rate was 1%; the overall morbidity rate was 29%. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 69.7%, The 5-year overall survival rate was 78.8%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document