33 Single-Cell Level Analysis Reveals Heterogeneous Expression of Stem-Cell Specific Genes in Human Small Intestinal Organoids

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. S11
Author(s):  
Kohei Suzuki ◽  
Satoru Fujii ◽  
Ami Kawamoto ◽  
Fumiaki Ishibashi ◽  
Toru Nakata ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-127
Author(s):  
Kohei Suzuki ◽  
Konomi Kuwabara ◽  
Junichi Takahashi ◽  
Sho Anzai ◽  
Reiko Kuno ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
MASAMI YOSHIKAWA ◽  
TOHRU UOZUMI ◽  
KEIICHI KAWAMOTO ◽  
KAZUNORI ARITA ◽  
AKIHIRO ITO ◽  
...  

Immunity ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trine A. Kristiansen ◽  
Elin Jaensson Gyllenbäck ◽  
Alya Zriwil ◽  
Tomas Björklund ◽  
Jeremy A. Daniel ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hengxing Ba ◽  
Datao Wang ◽  
Weiyao Wu ◽  
Hongmei Sun ◽  
Chunyi Li

AbstractAntler regeneration, a stem cell-based epimorphic process, has potential as a valuable model for regenerative medicine. A pool of antler stem cells (ASCs) for antler development is located in the antlerogenic periosteum (AP). However, whether this ASC pool is homogenous or heterogeneous has not been fully evaluated. In this study, we produced a comprehensive transcriptome dataset at the single-cell level for the ASCs based on the 10x Genomics platform (scRNA-seq). A total of 4,565 ASCs were sequenced and classified into a large cell cluster, indicating that the ASCs resident in the AP are likely to be a homogeneous population. The scRNA-seq data revealed that tumor-related genes were highly expressed in these homogeneous ASCs: i.e. TIMP1, TMSB10, LGALS1, FTH1, VIM, LOC110126017 and S100A4. Results of screening for stem cell markers suggest that the ASCs may be considered as a special type of stem cell between embryonic (CD9) and adult (CD29, CD90, NPM1 and VIM) stem cells. Our results provide the first comprehensive transcriptome analysis at the single-cell level for the ASCs, and identified only one major cell type resident in the AP and some key stem cell genes, which may hold the key to why antlers, the unique mammalian organ, can fully regenerate once lost.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 364-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanan Xu ◽  
Jiumei Hu ◽  
Qiangyuan Zhu ◽  
Qi Song ◽  
Ying Mu

Single cancer stem cell analysis of four biomarker genes by microfluidic one-step digital RT-PCR.


2012 ◽  
Vol 122 (9) ◽  
pp. 3029-3034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Hoggatt ◽  
David T. Scadden

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peifeng Jing ◽  
Yannan Liu ◽  
Ethan G. Keeler ◽  
Nelly M. Cruz ◽  
Benjamin S. Freedman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Melinda Fagan

I have previously argued that stem cell experiments cannot in principle demonstrate that a single cell is a stem cell ([reference omitted for anonymous review]).  Laplane and others dispute this claim, citing experiments that identify stem cells at the single-cell level.  This paper rebuts the counterexample, arguing that these alleged ‘crucial stem cell experiments’ do not measure self-renewal for a single cell, do not establish a single cell’s differentiation potential, and, if interpreted as providing results about single cells, fall into epistemic circularity.  I then examine the source of the dispute, noting differences in philosophical and experimental perspectives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document