28LBA Conceptual change in oncology: Progression-Free-Survival (PFS) is a more appropriate surrogate for Overall Survival (OS) than Time-To-Progression (TTP)

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Porzsolt ◽  
A.S. Weber ◽  
R. Muche
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Conceptual Change ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival

Comparison of abiraterone acetate (Abi) versus ketoconazole (Keto) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) refractory to docetaxel (D).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
Avivit Peer ◽  
Maya Ish-Shalom ◽  
Natalie Maimon ◽  
Maya Gottfried ◽  
Ben Boursi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Appendicular Skeleton ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Psa Response

146 Background: Abi is a standard treatment (tx) in pts with mCRPC refractory to deocetaxel. It is a potent and selective CYP 17 inhibitor that blocks the synthesis of androgens in the testis, adrenal glands, and prostate. However, in many countries where abi has not been approved yet, keto is used as an alternative CYP 17 inhibitor. Although preclinical data suggests that keto is a less specific and potent inhibitor of CYP 17, there are limited clinical data comparing both agents. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of abi vs keto in pts with mCRPC refractory to D. Methods: Records from 156 mCRPC pts treated with keto 200 - 400 mg 3x day, in 4 centers across the US and Israel, were reviewed retrospectively. 26 pts treated post D were individually matched by clinicopathologic factors to pts treated with abi (selected from a multicenter Israeli database, n=120). We compared the PSA response (decrease ≥50% from baseline), biochemical and radiological progression free survival, and overall survival between the groups. Progression free survival and overall survival were determined by Cox regression. Results: The groups were matched by Gleason score, pre-tx disease extent (limited-axial skeleton and/or nodal vs extensive- appendicular skeleton and/or visceral), ECOG PS, pre-tx risk category (favorable, intermediate, poor; Keizman, Oncologist 2012). Furthermore, they were balanced regarding median age (71 abi vs 69 keto), time from primary tx to disease relapse, time to progression on prior GnRH-a and antiandrogen, PSA response and time to progression on prior D, pre-tx pain score/alkaline phosphatase/hemoglobin/ neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio/PSADT/PSA. In the groups of abi vs keto, PSA response was 46% vs 19% (OR 4.4, p=0.043), median biochemical PFS 7 vs 2 months (HR 0.65, p=0.02), median radiological PFS 6 vs 2.5 months (HR 0.63, p=0.016), median overall survival 17 vs 12 months (HR 0.53, p=0.79), and tx interruption d/t adverse events 12% vs 23% (0R 0.6, p=0.023). Conclusions: In mCRPC refractory to D, the outcome of pts treated with abiraterone was superior to ketoconazole.

scholarly journals Phase II trial of cisplatin, gemcitabine and pembrolizumab for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252665
Author(s):  
Christine S. Walsh ◽  
Mitchell Kamrava ◽  
Andre Rogatko ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
Andrew Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Duration Of Response

Objective To evaluate the combination of pembrolizumab, cisplatin and gemcitabine in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods Patients received six cycles of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin on day 1 and day 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle. Pembrolizumab was administered on day 1 of cycles 3–6 and as maintenance monotherapy in cycles 7–34. Palliative radiation to a non-target symptomatic lesion was allowed. The primary objective was overall response rate by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival, time to progression, duration of response and overall survival. Results An interim analysis for futility was performed at 18 evaluable patients. Overall response rate was 60%, duration of response was 4.9 months and time to progression was 5.2 months. Progression-free survival at 6 and 12 months was 43% and 5%. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months and median overall survival was 11.3 months. In all patients, CA125 levels reflected response and progression. There were no pseudoprogression events. After receiving palliative radiation during pembrolizumab maintenance, a patient with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma had an exceptional and durable response that is ongoing for greater than 2 years. After consultation with the sponsor, based on the modest duration of response observed at the interim analysis for futility, the decision was made to close the trial to further accrual. Conclusions The addition of pembrolizumab to cisplatin and gemcitabine did not appear to provide benefit beyond chemotherapy alone in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

RTOG 0131: Phase II trial of pre-irradiation and concurrent temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and mixed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas: Relationship between 1p/19q status and progression-free survival

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1517-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Vogelbaum ◽  
B. Berkey ◽  
D. Peereboom ◽  
C. Giannini ◽  
R. Jenkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Chromosome 8 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Free Survival

1517 Background: In a previous report, we showed in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas (AOs) and mixed anaplastic oligoastrocytomas (MAOs) that temozolomide (TMZ) can be given concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) with acceptable toxicity. We have now evaluated the efficacy of this regimen and correlated durability of response with tumor 1p/19q genotype. Methods: A phase II study was performed to evaluate the use of pre-RT TMZ followed by concurrent RT and TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed AO or MAO. The primary endpoint was to determine the pre-RT TMZ six-month progression rate, and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and overall survival. Results: 40 eligible patients were entered into the trial. Thirty-two patients completed 6 months of pre-RT TMZ and concurrent RT and TMZ. Of the remaining eight patients, 4 withdrew due to toxicity and 4 other patients withdrew from study without evidence of toxicity or pre-RT progression. 1p/19q data are available in 37 cases; 23 tumors had loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of both 1p and 19q (double-deleted) while 14 tumors had LOH of either 1p or 19q (n = 3), or no LOH (n = 11). To date, 11 patients have experienced tumor progression; 1p/19q data are available for 10 of these cases (2 are double-deleted (2/23 = 9%), 8 have at least one intact chromosome (8/14 = 57%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrates that progression free survival is significantly better for the double-deleted group (median time to progression not reached) than for the intact group (median time to progression = 15.2 months, p = 0.001). Overall survival is 98% (39/40) with a median follow-up of 17.5 months (2.8 - 31.1 months). Conclusions: LOH of both 1p and 19q is strongly correlated with a durable response of AO and MAO to a combined regimen of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Tumors that are intact at 1p and/or 19q progress early despite an aggressive therapeutic regimen. These results suggest that future clinical trials should be prospectively stratified by tumor 1p/19q genotype. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Lapatinib for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
J Jones ◽  
A Takeda ◽  
J Picot ◽  
C von Keyserlingk ◽  
A Clegg
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lapatinib for the treatment of advanced or metastatic HER2overexpressing breast cancer based upon a review of the manufacturer’s submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal (STA) process. The scope included women with advanced, metastatic or recurrent HER2-overexpressing breast cancer who have had previous therapy that includes trastuzumab. Outcomes were time to progression, progression-free survival, response rates, overall survival, health-related quality of life and adverse effects. The submission’s evidence came from one randomised controlled trial (RCT) of reasonable methodological quality, although it was not powered to detect a statistically significant difference in mean overall survival. Median time to progression was longer in the lapatinib plus capecitabine arm than in the capecitabine monotherapy arm {27.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.4 to 49.4] versus 18.6 [95% CI 9.1 to 36.9] weeks; hazard ratio 0.57 [95% CI 0.43 to 0.77; p = 0.00013]}. Median overall survival was very similar between the groups [67.7 (95% CI 58.9 to 91.6) versus 66.6 (95% CI 49.1 to 75.0) weeks; hazard ratio 0.78 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.12; p = 0.177)]. Median progression-free survival was statistically significantly longer in the lapatinib plus capecitabine group than in the capecitabine monotherapy group [27.1 (95% CI 24.1 to 36.9) versus 17.6 (95% CI 13.3 to 20.1) weeks; hazard ratio 0.55 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.74); p = 0.000033]. The manufacturer’s economic model to estimate progression-free and overall survival for patients with HER2-positive advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had relapsed following treatment with an anthracycline, a taxane and trastuzumab was appropriate for the disease area. The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for lapatinib plus capecitabine compared with capecitabine monotherapy or vinorelbine monotherapy were higher than would conventionally be considered cost-effective. When compared with trastuzumab-containing regimes, lapatinib plus capecitabine dominated. In sensitivity analyses the ICER for lapatinib plus capecitabine compared with capecitabine monotherapy or vinorelbine monotherapy was robust to variation in assumptions. In all sensitivity analyses the ICERs remained higher than would conventionally be considered cost-effective. ICERs for trastuzumab-containing regimes were particularly sensitive to assumptions over the frequency of treatment, which had a large effect on the cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus capecitabine. In conclusion, there was a general lack of evidence on the effectiveness of comparators included in the model and on key parameters such as dose adjustments and the model outputs need to be interpreted in the light of this uncertainty. At the time of writing, NICE were still considering the available evidence for this appraisal.

Comparison of abiraterone acetate (Abi) versus ketoconazole (Keto) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) refractory to docetaxel (D).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16068-e16068
Author(s):  
Avivit Peer ◽  
Maya Ish-Shalom ◽  
Natalie Maimon ◽  
Maya Gottfried ◽  
Ben Boursi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Appendicular Skeleton ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Disease Extent ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Psa Response

e16068 Background: Abi is a standard treatment (tx) in pts with mCRPC refractory to D. It is a potent and selective CYP 17 inhibitor, that blocks the synthesis of androgens in the testis, adrenal glands, and prostate. However, in many countries where abi has not been approved yet, keto is used as an alternative CYP 17 inhibitor. Although preclinical data suggests that keto is a less specific and potent inhibitor of CYP 17, there are limited clinical data comparing both agents. Aims: To compare the clinical effectiveness of abi vs keto in pts with mCRPC refractory to D. Methods: Records from 156 mCRPC pts treated with keto 200 - 400 mg 3x day, in 4 centers across the US and Israel, were reviewed retrospectively. 26 pts treated post D were individually matched by clinicopathologic factors to pts treated with abi (selected from a multicenter Israeli database, n=120). We compared the PSA response (decrease ≥50% from baseline), biochemical and radiological progression free survival, and overall survival between the groups. Progression free survival and overall survival were determined by Cox regression. Results: The groups were matched by Gleason score, pre-tx disease extent (limited-axial skeleton and/or nodal vs extensive- appendicular skeleton and/or visceral), ECOG PS, pre-tx risk category (favorable, intermediate, poor; Keizman, Oncologist 2012). Furthermore, they were balanced regarding median age (71 abi vs 69 keto), time from primary tx to disease relapse, time to progression on prior GnRH-a and antiandrogen, PSA response and time to progression on prior D, pre-tx pain score/alkaline phosphatase/hemoglobin/neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio/PSADT/PSA. In the groups of abi vs keto, PSA response was 46% vs 19% (OR 4.4, p=0.043), median biochemical PFS 7 vs 2 months (HR 0.65, p=0.02), median radiological PFS 6 vs 2.5 months (HR 0.63, p=0.016), median overall survival 17 vs 12 months (HR 0.53, p=0.79), and tx interruption d/t adverse events 12% vs 23% (0R 0.6, p=0.023). Conclusions: In mCRPC refractory to D, the outcome of pts treated with abiraterone was superior to ketoconazole.

scholarly journals Essence of survival analysis†

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-81
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Pugh
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Event Data ◽  
Time To Event ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Phase Ii And Iii

AbstractMany clinical trials are designed based on a time-to-event endpoint. Overall survival and progression-free survival are commonly used, especially in Phase II and III clinical trials. Overall survival measures the time to death from any cause, while progression-free survival measures the time to progression of the disease or death from any cause. The key distinguishing factor is that the event of interest, such as death, may not occur in all individuals, making their time to this event unknown. Survival analysis comprises of the methods used to estimate the rates associated with time-to-an-event data, compare the rates between groups, and assess how other factors impact these rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document