scholarly journals Connecting quantitatively derived personality–psychopathology models and neuroscience

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Latzman ◽  
Robert F. Krueger ◽  
Colin G. DeYoung ◽  
Giorgia Michelini

Abstract Traditionally, personality has been conceptualized in terms of dimensions of human experience – habitual ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving. By contrast, psychopathology has traditionally been conceptualized in terms of categories of disorder – disordered thinking, feeling, and behaving. The empirical literature, however, routinely shows that psychopathology does not coalesce into readily distinguishable categories. Indeed, psychopathology tends to delineate dimensions that are relatively similar to dimensions of personality. In this special issue of Personality Neuroscience, authors took up the challenge of reconceptualizing personality and psychopathology in terms of connected and interrelated dimensions, and they considered the utility of pursuing neuroscientific inquiry from this more integrative perspective. In this editorial article, we provide the relevant background to the interface between personality, psychopathology, and neuroscience; summarize contributions to the special issue; and point toward directions for continued research and refinement. All told, it is evident that quantitatively derived, integrative models of personality–psychopathology represent a particularly promising conduit for advancing our understanding of the neurobiological foundation of human experience, both functional and dysfunctional.

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeno E. Franco ◽  
Olivia Efthimiou

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaile S. Cannella ◽  
Mirka Koro-Ljungberg

Concern regarding capitalism, profiteering, and the corporatization of higher education is not new. A market focus that creates students as consumers and faculty as service providers has dominated global practices in colleges and universities for some time. Most recently, however, this more liberal market-driven focus has actually morphed away from a jurisdictional emphasis (with a potential focus on fairness) to forms of veridiction (neoliberal truth regimes) that legitimate intervention into all aspects of society, the environment, interpretations of the world around us, even into the physical individual bodies of human beings as well as the more-than-human. In higher education, this neoliberal saturation has led to changes that are of seismic proportion. The authors in this special issue describe their own research into, interpretations of, and life experiences as they attempt to survive within this neoliberal condition, and as they also generate counter conducts and ways of thinking without neoliberalism.


eTopia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tricia Toso

Place can be understood as not a fixed geographical location, but as an event that emerges in the encounter between continually transforming materialand human elements, social relations and practices; that place is composed
of strands of human experience, memory, histories and stories in a particular material setting. This article draws on Amin and Thrift’s “ontology of encounter” and Lefebvre’s method of rhythmanalysis to explore the complex interactions of geography, social practices and city environment. An “auditory turn” offers ways of thinking about the mobilities, encounters and narratives of an urban neighbourhood that combine and merge to give rise to a soundscape. A turn toward the sensory and auditory offers new paths for analysis in urban geography, mobilities and infrastructure studies. 


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndal M. Bullock ◽  
Robert A. Gable

AbstractThere have been visible demographic changes in our classrooms, schools, communities, and nation. These changes have called for new ways of thinking and doing. It is no more new to see culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) learners in our schools. The question then becomes, How do we improve their learning and behavioral outcomes? This article introduces the Special Issue of


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Stephen Selka

The transnational turn has generated new ways of thinking about borders and phenomena that cross them, including religion. Nevertheless, there is little agreement on what kinds of processes the terms “transnationalism” and “globalization” refer to and to what extent they represent something new. As the articles in this special issue examine, however, these terms refer not simply to actual changes in geographical scale but to distinct ways of imagining the world and specific claims about how the world should be. This introduction discusses the ways that the contributors to this issue attend to the role that the transnational imagination plays in religious discourse and practice.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn A. Sanders ◽  
Howard R. Steinberg

In this special issue, we are discussing issues related to evidence-based mentoring across types of training program. We have been asked to focus on topics related to such training at the predoctoral internship and postdoctoral residency levels. At these levels, mentoring primarily takes place in the context of clinical supervision, although it involves many other roles and responsibilities. We begin by placing our discussion in historical context and outlining previous research in supervision at the internship and postdoctoral levels as well as the barriers to the empirical study of supervision and its outcomes. We then describe the training settings in which we work and our approach to the practice and measurement of supervision at our site. In the absence of a body of empirical literature, we have attempted to implement a trainee-focused model of supervision that seems to fit with the overall structure and flow of our training site. We conclude with a call to the training community to advance efforts in the area of empirical investigation of our work to provide high quality supervision to our psychology trainees.


Urban Studies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 612-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Pratt

In this commentary piece, we are reminded that naming (in-formality) is an inherently political act. Informality is discussed through a number of dimensions: conceptually in relation to the term ‘formal’; considering its (ordinary) presence in the city; discussing the recognition and devaluation of the informal economy; and pointing to the contribution it makes to the global economy. Analytically, it is argued that informality requires a balancing concept of the formal; politically, informality is ‘the Other’, bound into a teleological relationship with the formal, but unable to ever achieve it. As such, informality is tied to and legitimates the ‘formal’. By reviewing the ontological critique and epistemological diversions deployed by some of the articles of this special issue, the commentary shows that the informal economy is not a ‘residual’ category but one that encompasses the majority of the human experience (urban and non-urban). In this sense, it puts forward the suggestion of viewing formality as exception and informality as the norm, for it is difficult to imagine a totally formal activity with no informality. Informality, then, should be interpreted as a hybrid of what is termed formal and informal. In all its varieties, it is shown that informality constitutes the everyday of the city. Yet, this commentary also calls to resist generalisations so as to be able to ‘see’ particular timed and placed informalities that exist in relation to a wider (local) social, political and economic setting, as well as a global one.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107780122095848
Author(s):  
Gwen Hunnicutt

I contextualize and provide commentary on this special issue that addresses new ways of thinking theoretically about violence against women and other forms of gender-based violence. After extracting key insights from each article, I explore how these contributions might inform our understanding of contemporary challenges related to violence against women. Next, I consider the #MeToo movement in light of the work presented in this volume. Finally, I consider what the #MeToo movement is signaling to scholars about new ways of thinking about violence against women and how this volume of work supports these key areas for focus and change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document