scholarly journals A class of translation planes of square order

1984 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Narayana Rao ◽  
K. Satyanarayana ◽  
G. Vithal Rao

A class of translation planes of order p2r, where r is an odd natural number and p is a prime, p ≥ 7, p ≢ ± (mod 10) is constructed. A salient feature shared by all these planes is that one ideal point is fixed by the translation complement and the remaining ideal points are divided into at least two orbits, one of which is of length pr.

1984 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Narayana Rao ◽  
K. Satyanarayana

Rao, Rodabaugh, Wilke and Zemmer [J. Combin. Theory Ser. A. 11 (1971), 72–92] constructed a number of new VW systems called C-systems from the exceptional near–fields and established that they coordinatize translation planes not isomorphic to generalized André planes. In this paper the translation complement of the plane coordinatized by the C-system I–1 has been found. This plane has the interesting property that its translation complement divides the ideal points into two orbits of lengths 10 and 16. Further, the translation complement contains a subgroup isomorphic to SL(2,5) and therefore one of the exceptional Walker's planes of order 25 [H. Luneberg, Translation Planes, Springer-Verlag (1980), pp.235–244] is indeed the C–plane corresponding to the C–system I–1, which was discovered in 1969.


1987 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-111
Author(s):  
M. L. Narayana Rao ◽  
K. Kuppuswamy Rao ◽  
G. V. Subba Rao

Narayana Rao, Rodabaugh, Wilke and Zemmer constructed a new class of finite translation planes from exceptional near-fields described by Dickson and Zassenhaus. These planes referred to as C-planes are not coordinatized by the generalized André systems. In this paper we compute the translation complement of the C-plane corresponding to the C-system III–1. It is found that the translation complement is of order 6912 and it divides the set of ideal points into two orbits of lengths 2 and 48.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Kubinec ◽  
Sharan Grewal

Is power-sharing an effective way for endangered transitional democracies to reduce political tensions and improve government performance? We provide one of the first quantitative tests of this question in Tunisia, the Arab Spring's only success story. We argue that power-sharing may reduce polarization for a limited time, but at the cost of undermining democratic institutions. To measure polarization, we examine all rollcall votes from Tunisia's first and second post-transition parliaments. We employ a time-varying ideal point model and examine whether power-sharing agreements led to convergence in political parties' ideal points. Our analysis reveals that Tunisia's national unity government in 2015 temporarily moderated political tensions and allowed for parliamentary activity to resume. However, despite a broadening of the coalition in mid-2016, polarization reemerged and crucial legislation stalled. Moreover, longitudinal survey data suggest that the failure of power-sharing in Tunisia contributed to disillusionment with political parties, parliament, and democracy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Tahk

Existing approaches to estimating ideal points offer no method for consistent estimation or inference without relying on strong parametric assumptions. In this paper, I introduce a nonparametric approach to ideal-point estimation and inference that goes beyond these limitations. I show that some inferences about the relative positions of two pairs of legislators can be made with minimal assumptions. This information can be combined across different possible choices of the pairs to provide estimates and perform hypothesis tests for all legislators without additional assumptions. I demonstrate the usefulness of these methods in two applications to Supreme Court data, one testing for ideological movement by a single justice and the other testing for multidimensional voting behavior in different decades.


1986 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 617-620
Author(s):  
V. Jha ◽  
N. L. Johnson

LetPbe an affine translation plane of orderq4admitting a nonsolvable groupGin its translation complement. IfGfixes more thanq+1slopes, the structure ofGis determined. In particular, ifGis simple thenqis even andG=L2(2s)for some integersat least2.


1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Narayana Rao ◽  
K. Kuppuswamy Rao

Ostrom proposed classifications of translation planes on the basis of the action of the collineation group of the plane on the ideal points. There are examples of translation planes in which ideal points form a single orbit (flag transitive planes) and also several orbits (Hall, André, Foulser, and so forth, planes). In this paper the authors have constructed a translation plane in which the ideal points are divided into two orbits of lengths 18 and 8 respectively. A few collineatlons are computed together with their actions. The group of collineations G1 which is transitive on the two sets of 18 and 8 lines separately is calculated. All the collineations that fix L0 are also calculated and they form a group of. If G2 is the group of translations then the full collineation group is shown to be 〈G1, G2, G3〉.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107699862110571
Author(s):  
Kuan-Yu Jin ◽  
Yi-Jhen Wu ◽  
Hui-Fang Chen

For surveys of complex issues that entail multiple steps, multiple reference points, and nongradient attributes (e.g., social inequality), this study proposes a new multiprocess model that integrates ideal-point and dominance approaches into a treelike structure (IDtree). In the IDtree, an ideal-point approach describes an individual’s attitude and then a dominance approach describes their tendency for using extreme response categories. Evaluation of IDtree performance via two empirical data sets showed that the IDtree fit these data better than other models. Furthermore, simulation studies showed a satisfactory parameter recovery of the IDtree. Thus, the IDtree model sheds light on the response processes of a multistage structure.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Peress

Ideal point estimation is a topic of central importance in political science. Published work relying on the ideal point estimates of Poole and Rosenthal for the U.S. Congress is too numerous to list. Recent work has applied ideal point estimation to the state legislatures, Latin American chambers, the Supreme Court, and many other chambers. Although most existing ideal point estimators perform well when the number of voters and the number of bills is large, some important applications involve small chambers. We develop an estimator that does not suffer from the incidental parameters problem and, hence, can be used to estimate ideal points in small chambers. Our Monte Carlo experiments show that our estimator offers an improvement over conventional estimators for small chambers. We apply our estimator to estimate the ideal points of Supreme Court justices in a multidimensional space.


Author(s):  
Alex Acs

Abstract This article develops a procedure for estimating the ideal points of actors in a political hierarchy, such as a public bureaucracy. The procedure is based on a spatial auditing model and is motivated by the idea that while agents within a political hierarchy are typically segregated in different policy fiefdoms, they are bound to a common principal that can scrutinize their policy proposals through selective reviews, or audits. The theoretical model shows how a principal’s decision to audit an agent’s proposal can reveal both actors’ spatial preferences, despite the strategic nature of the interaction. Empirical identification of the ideal points comes from leveraging settings where elections replace principals over time, but not agents. Although the procedure is quite general, I provide an illustration using data on federal regulatory policymaking in the United States and recover ideal point estimates for presidents and agencies across three administrations.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Hirsch

This paper analyzes the use of ideal point estimates for testing pivot theories of lawmaking such as Krehbiel's (1998, Pivotal politics: A theory of U.S. lawmaking. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago) pivotal politics and Cox and McCubbins's (2005, Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representations. New York: Cambridge University Press) party cartel model. Among the prediction of pivot theories is that all pivotal legislators will vote identically on all successful legislation. Clinton (2007, Lawmaking and roll calls. Journal of Politics 69:455–67) argues that the estimated ideal points of the pivotal legislators are therefore predicted to be statistically indistinguishable and false when estimated from the set of successful final passage roll call votes, which implies that ideal point estimates cannot logically be used to test pivot theories. I show using Monte Carlo simulation that when pivot theories are augmented with probabilistic voting, Clinton's prediction only holds in small samples when voting is near perfect. I furthermore show that the predicted bias is unlikely to be consequential with U.S. Congressional voting data. My analysis suggests that the methodology of estimating ideal points to compute theoretically relevant quantities for empirical tests is not inherently flawed in the case of pivot theories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document