scholarly journals The Household Benefit Cap: understanding the restriction of benefit income in Britain

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
CHRIS GROVER

Abstract Britain’s Household Benefit Cap restricts the amount of benefit income unemployed households can receive. In this article, it is examined using material held at the UK’s National Archives recording debates about a proposal to introduce a similar policy – a benefit limit – in the first Thatcher Conservative government elected in 1979. It was rejected, but the Household Benefit Cap was introduced three decades later. The article locates debates about, and the practice of restricting benefit income, in perennial social security concerns with the financial incentive to do waged work. The article argues that while there are material differences that help explain the different policy outcomes in 1980 and 2010, they can primarily be explained by changing ideas about the roles of social security policy, including the development of the ‘incentive paradigm’ concerned with manipulating behaviour; a loss of concern with the hardship that would come with the introduction of a benefit restriction and a view that institutions other than the state are better placed to address poverty and buttress work incentives.

Author(s):  
T. T. Dinh ◽  
T. H. Nguyen ◽  
N. Lu Quang

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 371-398
Author(s):  
Chul-Hoi Koo ◽  
Hye Jeong Oh ◽  
Byoungduk Sohn

1981 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-28
Author(s):  
DEAN R. LEIMER ◽  
PETER A. PETRI

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Chapman ◽  
Michael F. Gallmeyer ◽  
Chunyu Yang

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 51-59
Author(s):  
S. Kononov ◽  

The article is devoted to the analysis of the problems of a social security modern discourse formation in the framework of a philosophical discussion of the transformation processes of the formation vector of the state security policy. The task of the article, according to the author, is to present the problem of security in conditions when it ceases to be understood, as a concept associated with the idea of preserving the integrity of a state or nation, and functions as a phenomenon with the broadest possible social parameters. Using the methodology of phenomenological, hermeneutic and comparative analysis, the new areas of security research, common difference of which is social and personal orientation are analyzed. The author pays attention to the features of the methodology of works reflecting the point of view of the modern state, works related to the development of a systematic approach to security, works based on an axiological approach and concludes that, despite the expansion of security interpretations, all these approaches retain a common ideological foundation. presupposing the need to preserve the leading role of the state in the field of social security, including the security of the individual and society and the state. All these approaches are based on the policy of responding to emerging threats to the Russian state and do not reflect the needs of a comprehensive strategic goal-setting covering the sphere of socio-economic development of the social system. This circumstance, according to the author, leads to the formation of a security strategy that exists only in the name of protecting the state and does not imply feedback between the state and the social institutions that the state is going to protect, which leads to the ineffectiveness of modern protection measures and the need to find new ways to justify the need for this protection, a new definition of its content and essence


Author(s):  
John Bound ◽  
Arline T. Geronimus ◽  
Javier M. Rodriguez ◽  
Timothy Waidmann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document